Time |
Nickname |
Message |
00:23
🔗
|
godane |
i found a 2 hour podcast on g4tv.com |
00:23
🔗
|
godane |
its 684mb |
00:32
🔗
|
ersi |
argh at using urllib2 |
00:56
🔗
|
omf__ |
is wget the only application that has warc export features? |
00:59
🔗
|
Aranje |
ersi:) maybe try requests? |
04:25
🔗
|
godane |
i found ces2007 ms keynote |
04:25
🔗
|
godane |
its in 3 parts |
04:26
🔗
|
godane |
dam it |
04:26
🔗
|
godane |
part 3 is broken |
04:26
🔗
|
godane |
maybe all of it is broken |
04:26
🔗
|
godane |
fucking g4 |
06:43
🔗
|
godane |
i'm uploading a broken video now to see how it derive |
06:46
🔗
|
godane |
uploaded: https://archive.org/details/g4tv.com-video14990 |
06:46
🔗
|
godane |
lets see how IA takes |
06:52
🔗
|
godane |
dam it |
06:52
🔗
|
godane |
IA can't fix it |
06:56
🔗
|
BlueMax |
am I allowed to talk about something I'm doing that might be illegal in here |
06:57
🔗
|
chronomex |
BlueMax: talk about whatever you want, it's a free internet |
06:57
🔗
|
BlueMax |
lol |
06:58
🔗
|
BlueMax |
I'm trying to edit a PSP game's files because I find it interesting, come across what appears to be a compression format I've never seen before |
06:58
🔗
|
chronomex |
k |
06:58
🔗
|
chronomex |
how is that illegal? |
06:58
🔗
|
BlueMax |
opened the file in HxD and the first few characters are "VFS" |
06:58
🔗
|
BlueMax |
dunno, law is pretty crazy |
06:59
🔗
|
chronomex |
what's `file' say? |
06:59
🔗
|
BlueMax |
not sure what you mean |
06:59
🔗
|
chronomex |
are you on unix? |
07:00
🔗
|
BlueMax |
Windows |
07:00
🔗
|
chronomex |
put the file somewhere I can download from and I'll try to identify it |
07:00
🔗
|
chronomex |
10-20% likelihood of succes |
07:00
🔗
|
BlueMax |
will do |
07:01
🔗
|
godane |
hey guys |
07:01
🔗
|
godane |
can any of you look at video14990 |
07:01
🔗
|
godane |
the flv is broken |
07:01
🔗
|
godane |
so the full video is no derived |
07:01
🔗
|
godane |
*not derived |
07:02
🔗
|
godane |
only a 1:52 vs the 3:02 the original file has |
07:11
🔗
|
BlueMax |
chronomex, http://www.mediafire.com/?cr681ih63gf249r good luck and god speed |
07:11
🔗
|
chronomex |
mediafire goddamnit |
07:11
🔗
|
chronomex |
what the shit is wrong with you |
07:12
🔗
|
BlueMax |
well I don't own my own webserver and I have no idea where else I can put it |
07:12
🔗
|
chronomex |
k |
07:12
🔗
|
chronomex |
swebb: was it you who has the auto-op thing going on? |
07:13
🔗
|
chronomex |
hm, no hits BlueMax |
07:15
🔗
|
BlueMax |
yeah, it's a weird one |
07:15
🔗
|
BlueMax |
I thought the "VFS" might have meant something I didn't know about |
07:22
🔗
|
chronomex |
I'm seeing no common file headers within the first 2160 bytes |
07:23
🔗
|
chronomex |
for future reference, to find file headers at small offsets you split the file into a bunch of small copies, starting at offsets: for P in `seq 1 2160` ; do echo $P ; dd if=EDF2.DAT of=edf2-"$P".dat bs=1k skip="$P" count=1 iflag=skip_bytes ; done ; file -sk edf2-*.dat | less |
07:25
🔗
|
BlueMax |
I see |
07:26
🔗
|
BlueMax |
Well it has to be storing something - some form of text, some type of PSP format 3D models and textures |
07:27
🔗
|
BlueMax |
(although they aren't "PSP format" they're "formats used by PSP") |
07:27
🔗
|
BlueMax |
unfortunately I have no information on what those might be |
07:38
🔗
|
BlueMax |
maybe it's compressed, chronomex - when I was looking around someone on a forum who got to the same point I did said it might be a compressed file of some sort |
08:13
🔗
|
chronomex |
yeah it's clearly an archive file |
08:13
🔗
|
godane |
i have uploaded over 2K videos |
08:13
🔗
|
godane |
of g4tv.com |
08:18
🔗
|
asiekierk |
After uploading something to the FTP, how do I check it in? |
08:18
🔗
|
asiekierk |
As I'm a bit lost in the historical-quality design of archive.org |
09:46
🔗
|
DFJustin |
http://mamedev.emulab.it/etabeta/?p=260 |
10:15
🔗
|
ersi |
omf_: No, there's also something from one of IA's sister orgs called Net something.. |
10:15
🔗
|
ersi |
lol at BlueMax's "may I talk to something that might be illegal???" |
14:29
🔗
|
omf_ |
thanks ersi |
14:30
🔗
|
ersi |
Did you find it? I still havn't remembered the name of it |
14:30
🔗
|
omf_ |
nope |
14:40
🔗
|
tef |
omf_: NetPreserve ? |
15:29
🔗
|
omf_ |
tef, do they have an application that saves warc while archiving? I want to know how many applications out there support warc |
15:30
🔗
|
SketchCow |
wooooooo |
15:30
🔗
|
tef |
off the top of my head, heritrix, wget and a couple of toy projects do. I know some commerical companies |
15:30
🔗
|
tef |
also use warcs. |
15:31
🔗
|
tef |
SketchCow: how easy is it to visit IA in person? I am visiting sf for a few weeks next month and I am curious :D |
15:32
🔗
|
SketchCow |
easy. |
15:32
🔗
|
SketchCow |
noon every friday. free lunch |
15:32
🔗
|
SketchCow |
what weeks? |
15:35
🔗
|
tef |
26th feb->26th Mar |
15:36
🔗
|
joepie91 |
free lunch? :o |
15:36
🔗
|
joepie91 |
also, I'd love to visit IA in person some day, but other side of the ocean etc etc |
15:36
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: I have to admit my facial expression did perk up upon reading that I can get to IA, but free food too |
15:36
🔗
|
joepie91 |
(can someone please invent teleports already, thank you) |
15:36
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: ditto, this is my first experience outside europe. |
15:36
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: heh |
15:37
🔗
|
joepie91 |
well |
15:37
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I don't have the money for a plane ticket |
15:37
🔗
|
joepie91 |
so.. yeah |
15:37
🔗
|
joepie91 |
:p |
15:37
🔗
|
joepie91 |
probably not going to cross the ocean any time soon |
15:40
🔗
|
tef |
Yeah took me a while to save |
15:41
🔗
|
tef |
And I'm getting use of a sofa so I don't get hammered for accomodation costs, and i'll be telecommuting too |
15:42
🔗
|
* |
ersi weeps a little after fiddling with his spaghetti code |
15:43
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: well, with the 'income' I have, there's no saving |
15:43
🔗
|
joepie91 |
:p |
15:44
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: yeah, I couldn't afford it until I got a raise +year ago, paid off debts and got into +ve savings |
15:44
🔗
|
* |
joepie91 has no job, lives off donations for projects |
15:44
🔗
|
tef |
plus, being able to telecommute means I can stay out there for a bit |
15:44
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: get invited to a conference, get them to pay for flights ? |
15:45
🔗
|
joepie91 |
even then I probably wouldn't have enough money to travel to for example IA |
15:45
🔗
|
ersi |
joepie91: Ballsy |
15:45
🔗
|
joepie91 |
:P |
15:45
🔗
|
joepie91 |
my monthly living expenses (and thus income) are about 250 euro |
15:48
🔗
|
tef |
cheap rent? |
15:50
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: sounds fun though |
15:50
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: i kinda resent not being able to publish my work |
15:50
🔗
|
joepie91 |
sometimes, sometimes not |
15:50
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and well, no rent - where I live now was previously a squat, there's a non-monetary temporary rent contract with the owner now |
15:51
🔗
|
joepie91 |
for as long as it's not sold |
15:51
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and well, that's what I really like about living this way - I can do whatever the damn hell I please to, with the things I make |
15:51
🔗
|
joepie91 |
:p |
15:51
🔗
|
tef |
nice1 |
15:51
🔗
|
tef |
nice!, even |
15:51
🔗
|
joepie91 |
the result is http://cryto.net/~joepie91 and http://github.com/joepie91 |
15:52
🔗
|
tef |
fun |
15:52
🔗
|
tef |
i have github.com/tef for what i've managed to hack together |
15:53
🔗
|
joepie91 |
ah, I should probably add http://learn.cryto.net/ to my list of things |
15:53
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: I think I've seen your github acc before |
15:53
🔗
|
tef |
:O |
15:54
🔗
|
joepie91 |
can't quite recall what from |
15:54
🔗
|
ersi |
probably warctools? |
15:54
🔗
|
joepie91 |
possibly, idk |
15:55
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I have a terrible memory at times :P |
15:55
🔗
|
tef |
likely. unless you saw the toy crawler I wrote, or the rpc-esque yet conspicuously restful api thingy |
15:55
🔗
|
joepie91 |
also, tef, you may find this useful in particular: http://cryto.net/zippydoc |
15:55
🔗
|
joepie91 |
(unrelated, what's wat? |
15:56
🔗
|
joepie91 |
hmm, going to have a read through the crawler at some point, might have some useful pointers |
15:57
🔗
|
joepie91 |
my most recent crawling/scraping stuff is at https://github.com/joepie91/crytolearn/tree/develop/updater/scrapers |
15:57
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: weirdly enough I find RST not that complex or hard |
15:57
🔗
|
ersi |
the crawler is pretty nice |
15:57
🔗
|
joepie91 |
also https://github.com/joepie91/crytolearn/tree/develop/updater/shared |
15:58
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: hmm. I basically gave up in frustration after a while. |
15:58
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: my only skill right now seems to be that I have read the http spec and warc spec |
15:58
🔗
|
joepie91 |
you know the warc spec? |
15:58
🔗
|
tef |
yes |
15:58
🔗
|
tef |
i've even met one of the authors :O |
15:58
🔗
|
joepie91 |
:D |
15:59
🔗
|
ersi |
coolio |
15:59
🔗
|
tef |
clement from the bnf |
15:59
🔗
|
joepie91 |
but eh, I'm unsure whether hanzo tools already fulfill this |
15:59
🔗
|
joepie91 |
but it would be sort of useful |
15:59
🔗
|
joepie91 |
to have a warc modification module in py |
15:59
🔗
|
joepie91 |
with a sane API |
15:59
🔗
|
joepie91 |
that's well documented |
15:59
🔗
|
joepie91 |
:P |
15:59
🔗
|
ersi |
I'm struggling with getting the WARCs I write nice |
15:59
🔗
|
joepie91 |
so if that doesn't exist yet, there might be a project in there for you :P |
15:59
🔗
|
tef |
yeah |
16:00
🔗
|
joepie91 |
'sane' being sane in the sense of what requests is like |
16:00
🔗
|
tef |
warctools doesn't have a nice 'requests' layer over it |
16:00
🔗
|
tef |
didn;t get the time |
16:00
🔗
|
joepie91 |
not 'like python standard lib' because quite honestly, python standard lib is horrible |
16:00
🔗
|
joepie91 |
heh |
16:00
🔗
|
* |
ersi nods |
16:00
🔗
|
tef |
it's kinda 'here is enough to get going, away with you' |
16:00
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: that's what I got from my cursory looks at warctools |
16:00
🔗
|
ersi |
both IA's python warc library and warctools are in that state |
16:00
🔗
|
tef |
you have to write a lot of boilerplate once, but heh, you at least don't have to write a parser |
16:00
🔗
|
joepie91 |
then again, that's also what I got from urllib/urllib2 |
16:00
🔗
|
joepie91 |
so probably a requests-like abstraction layer is in order |
16:01
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: i am happy I got a http parser inside warctools |
16:01
🔗
|
ersi |
I'm banging my head around handling redirects with urllib2 and saving them down to a warc right now |
16:01
🔗
|
joepie91 |
:P |
16:01
🔗
|
joepie91 |
ersi: use requests |
16:01
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: link, by any chance? |
16:01
🔗
|
joepie91 |
to that particular bit of code |
16:01
🔗
|
ersi |
I know, of course of requests. I did go with urllib2 though |
16:02
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91 it's in warctools - hanzo/httptools/messaging.py |
16:03
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I see |
16:04
🔗
|
joepie91 |
:p |
16:04
🔗
|
joepie91 |
okay, that's too big for me to read in a cursory manner |
16:04
🔗
|
joepie91 |
usually other peoples python code confuses me anyway |
16:04
🔗
|
joepie91 |
recently managed to hack a bit on beautifulsoup |
16:04
🔗
|
ersi |
It's a skill in it self to read others code |
16:04
🔗
|
joepie91 |
to make it comprehend nth-of-parent |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
in css selectors |
16:05
🔗
|
ersi |
cool |
16:05
🔗
|
tef |
ersi: yeah, very much so |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and while I was doing that |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I also fixed direct descendant support |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
so that it actually worked as it should |
16:05
🔗
|
ersi |
debugging code and extending code is also separate skills, imo |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
instead of choking on class names or IDs |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
ersi: I'm good at reading other peoples code, just not python |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
there seem to be so many ways to do everything |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
it's nearly impossible to understand all of them |
16:05
🔗
|
joepie91 |
on sight |
16:05
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: heh, that's the first I've heard someone say that of python |
16:06
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: never used perl then :-) |
16:06
🔗
|
ersi |
hehe, I guess - though that's a rather rare opinion |
16:06
🔗
|
joepie91 |
well, actually |
16:06
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I've tried to fix a perl scraper |
16:06
🔗
|
joepie91 |
once |
16:06
🔗
|
joepie91 |
was quite hard, but primarily because of syntax |
16:06
🔗
|
ersi |
shrug :) |
16:06
🔗
|
* |
joepie91 and eq are not friends |
16:06
🔗
|
tef |
personally I find python one of the easiest, but I've been using it for ~10 years and 4 in work |
16:06
🔗
|
joepie91 |
anyway, I sort of got the yahoo cache scraper to work |
16:06
🔗
|
joepie91 |
... sometimes |
16:06
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and the bing scraper too |
16:07
🔗
|
joepie91 |
google cache scraper stayed dead |
16:07
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: python as a language is really easy |
16:07
🔗
|
joepie91 |
it's just that there's a gazillion libraries for every single thing you could possibly want to do and just as many ways to write the code to do so (ranging from C-like to pythonic) |
16:07
🔗
|
joepie91 |
so it takes a really big amount of time to learn to recognize all code styles and patterns in them |
16:07
🔗
|
joepie91 |
compared to other languages |
16:08
🔗
|
joepie91 |
imo |
16:08
🔗
|
joepie91 |
the way I read code is by recognizing certain patterns in the code, not by actually reading it token by token |
16:08
🔗
|
joepie91 |
so the more possible patterns to do the same thing, the longer it'll take for me to recognize that thing with 100% accuracy |
16:09
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: most languages end up having this once they are big enough |
16:09
🔗
|
joepie91 |
(that being said, pattern-based code reading can be really useful.. I have, however scary it may be, sort of developed an internal 'PHP interpreter' in my mind, so I can just look at code and determine at any point what is doing what, and which variables are holding what values ._.) |
16:09
🔗
|
joepie91 |
(in PHP at least) |
16:09
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: that's called learning programming |
16:09
🔗
|
joepie91 |
? |
16:10
🔗
|
tef |
being able to reason about what the code does without running it |
16:10
🔗
|
joepie91 |
no, it goes beyond that |
16:10
🔗
|
tef |
also, you may have just read a lot of awful python |
16:10
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I can't just *reason* what code does, I can actually mentally *execute* it so to say |
16:10
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: I would wager that if you can't interpret what the code does you don't understand it |
16:11
🔗
|
joepie91 |
as if my mind is one big debugger from a cursory look |
16:11
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and this seems to be not very common, judging from how much trouble other people have writing a parser |
16:11
🔗
|
joepie91 |
without a spec |
16:11
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: I can't really explain it any better, there's a difference between understanding what code does and almost literally having a VM in your mind running it |
16:12
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I've written a template parser in PHP, sort of token-based, just outputs a syntax tree |
16:12
🔗
|
joepie91 |
most of the very experienced PHP developers I've shared it with had trouble understanding it |
16:12
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: no, to me, if you can't run it in your head, you don't understand the code |
16:12
🔗
|
joepie91 |
not because of messy code, but just because they couldn't figure out what it did where without a debugging tool of some sort |
16:12
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: that might be your code :-) |
16:13
🔗
|
joepie91 |
said people can't point out any issues with the code |
16:13
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and I can read other peoples PHP parsers just the same :P |
16:13
🔗
|
joepie91 |
er |
16:13
🔗
|
joepie91 |
PHP-based parsers |
16:13
🔗
|
tef |
without trying to be mean, if you struggle to understand python, and people strugle to understand yours, well, you might want to practice more at reading and writing |
16:13
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: people typically have absolutely no issue understanding my code |
16:14
🔗
|
tef |
'can't figure out what it does without a debugger' |
16:14
🔗
|
joepie91 |
python is obviously a bit messier since I've started on that recently, but as a general rule of thumb even non-programmers can grasp how my code works |
16:14
🔗
|
joepie91 |
yes, I was refering to the parser |
16:14
🔗
|
joepie91 |
because that requires you to keep track of a LOT of variables at the same time |
16:14
🔗
|
joepie91 |
that are constantly being changed |
16:14
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and this is what I mean with a difference between understanding the code and mentally 'running' the code |
16:15
🔗
|
Aranje |
I'm with tef... you're setting a lower bar for "understanding" that shouldn't be there :D |
16:15
🔗
|
tef |
yeah |
16:15
🔗
|
tef |
understanding the code. being able to explain what it does, step by step. |
16:15
🔗
|
Aranje |
you understand php. I comprehend it, or some other such word |
16:15
🔗
|
tef |
being able to use the code, understand what it should be doing, or using it as a library, sure |
16:16
🔗
|
* |
Aranje wonders if perhaps english is weak at this differentiation |
16:16
🔗
|
tef |
Aranje: possibly |
16:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
sigh, I don't seem to be capable of sufficiently explaining the difference between your usage of the word 'understand' and my usage of the word 'mentally run'... |
16:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: I am absolutely sure that I understand what you mean |
16:16
🔗
|
Aranje |
joepie91:) nono, we're telling you that understand = mentally run |
16:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
the problem is that I can't concretely point out where the difference is between how I mentally 'run' code |
16:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and what you see as 'understanding' |
16:16
🔗
|
tef |
the problem is with code, it's hard to tell why it should look that way |
16:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
Aranje: and I'm trying to explain that that is not the case |
16:17
🔗
|
joepie91 |
but failing to find the proper words to do so |
16:17
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: we call being able to mentally interpret the code 'understanding it' |
16:17
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: except it's still not the same as what I mean with 'mentally running' |
16:17
🔗
|
tef |
in the sense 'i understand your idea' -> 'i have a mental model of your idea, how it fits togethr, and I could explain it' |
16:17
🔗
|
joepie91 |
let's just drop this subject until I find a better way to explain it |
16:17
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: if you can't point out a difference, there miht not be any :-) |
16:17
🔗
|
* |
Aranje grins |
16:18
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: that's an incorrect assumption to make |
16:18
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and a very dangerous one |
16:18
🔗
|
Aranje |
it's possible though :P |
16:18
🔗
|
joepie91 |
Aranje: I strongly dispute that in this particular case |
16:18
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: welcome to duck typed logic :-) |
16:18
🔗
|
* |
Aranje laughs |
16:18
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: the thing that I get is that you are trying to explain a level of comprehension above your peer group |
16:19
🔗
|
joepie91 |
no, that's the point |
16:19
🔗
|
joepie91 |
it's not a "level" |
16:19
🔗
|
joepie91 |
it's a different *type* |
16:19
🔗
|
tef |
hrm |
16:19
🔗
|
* |
Aranje pines for the word false dichotomy |
16:19
🔗
|
tef |
I see, so you're talking about that how you internalize things is different to other people |
16:20
🔗
|
joepie91 |
yes |
16:20
🔗
|
joepie91 |
with regards to PHP code, at least |
16:20
🔗
|
tef |
here is my definition for understanding |
16:20
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I haven't really looked into it for other languages or concepts |
16:20
🔗
|
tef |
you can write the code |
16:21
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: the thing we're saying, is that if you can't interpret the code, well, you're doing it wrong :-) |
16:21
🔗
|
tef |
not programming, but incantation |
16:21
🔗
|
joepie91 |
the problem is that it seems your definition of "interpret" is different from that of mine, but I cannot currently find the right words to express how |
16:21
🔗
|
joepie91 |
blurgh, vocal language is so limited at times |
16:22
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: if you mean 'run the code in your head', i.e this is x, this is y, this is the step that happens next |
16:22
🔗
|
tef |
we mean interpret in the sense t hat given a function, inputs you can calculate the output in the same way the computer does |
16:23
🔗
|
joepie91 |
tef: am I correct if I say that your meaning of 'interpret' is "input and output must be equal to reference implementation, but mental implementation can differ"? |
16:23
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: no |
16:24
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: that's like saying 'I can run this code twice, do different things and get the same output' |
16:24
🔗
|
Aranje |
"run the code in your head" |
16:24
🔗
|
tef |
(unless your code is non deterministic, for ex, but I don't think many people have that sort of ambiguity...) |
16:24
🔗
|
tef |
joepie91: here is a thing: how does the php sort function work |
16:25
🔗
|
tef |
you can deal with it in an abstraction - something with unstable sorting, probably worst case quadratic |
16:25
🔗
|
tef |
or, for ex, you can know the actual algorithm underneath |
16:25
🔗
|
tef |
and sometimes exploit the characteristics |
16:25
🔗
|
tef |
like to merge two lists in python, concat them and sort them. because of how the sort works, it exploits latent order in the data structures |
16:26
🔗
|
joepie91 |
er, unintentionally this has made me realize a flaw in my mindset - I try to avoid doing things for which I am not aware of the implementation... I should probably fix taht |
16:26
🔗
|
joepie91 |
that * |
16:27
🔗
|
Aranje |
to me that says you just need to dive into the implementation, but it's a sidetrack |
16:27
🔗
|
ersi |
... what. How did I get a warc record with only the headers and no payload ò_ò |
16:50
🔗
|
joepie91 |
<AnonNews247>hi i see no on talking why is that? |
16:50
🔗
|
joepie91 |
- AnonNews247 quit (User quit: Page closed) |
16:50
🔗
|
joepie91 |
(2 minutes later) |
16:51
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I am really not quite sure how people expect there to be activity within 2 minutes on a public chatroom |
16:51
🔗
|
joepie91 |
even if they are not familiar with IRC |
16:51
🔗
|
joepie91 |
it's like standing on a plaza in the middle of the night and expecting there to walk someone towards you and talk to you within 2 minutes |
17:00
🔗
|
Aranje |
perhaps their concept is closer to aol chat rooms from the 90's? |
17:01
🔗
|
Aranje |
I think many were not on those chat rooms, but I mean model-wise |
17:01
🔗
|
joepie91 |
idk :/ |
17:10
🔗
|
ersi |
2 minutes could be a pretty long time |
22:34
🔗
|
godane |
i see that the flv file jumps from 1:42 to 268:10:42 |
23:45
🔗
|
godane |
some one should help me get this: http://www.g4tv.com/techtvvault/index.html |
23:46
🔗
|
godane |
i want to grab the pages so i can make a index |
23:48
🔗
|
godane |
going to bed right now |