#archiveteam-bs 2014-02-08,Sat

↑back Search

Time Nickname Message
00:49 πŸ”— godane SketchCow: i can't download the m4v files of 1up shows in wayback
00:49 πŸ”— godane for some reason wayback hates downloading video
00:49 πŸ”— godane or at least zdmedia urls suck
00:59 πŸ”— godane anyways i may get some full episodes of gma from 2008
01:30 πŸ”— godane i'm getting a abc news special called berlin: the last 96 hours
01:30 πŸ”— godane aired on nov. 12, 1989
01:33 πŸ”— godane also i maybe able to get primetime episodes
01:57 πŸ”— godane i'm uploading total guitar 2009 cds
05:20 πŸ”— godane so i found some old xml of abcnews: https://web.archive.org/web/20070127172052/http://abcnews.go.com/Video/echoXML?
05:20 πŸ”— godane sadly i think all links are dead
05:56 πŸ”— chfoo schemer.com is dead
06:01 πŸ”— chfoo also https://archiveteam.org doesn't have a valid ssl certificate
06:40 πŸ”— rduser so like
06:40 πŸ”— rduser the lego movie was FUCKING AWESOME
06:46 πŸ”— xmc so I've heard
06:46 πŸ”— xmc say more
06:53 πŸ”— rduser it was just
06:53 πŸ”— rduser Lol's the whole time
06:54 πŸ”— rduser i went drunk with friends tbh
06:54 πŸ”— rduser but it was fuckin good
06:55 πŸ”— rduser legos were my childhood so
06:55 πŸ”— rduser i loved it
06:57 πŸ”— rduser also lol will ferrell in it
07:00 πŸ”— godane does anyone have access to classicnickshows.net forums here?
07:00 πŸ”— godane i would like a invitation code please
07:42 πŸ”— godane so i got a good question about this page: http://abcnews.go.com/topics/lifestyle/health/avandia.htm
07:42 πŸ”— godane its using rtsp://start.real.com path
07:43 πŸ”— godane does anyone know how to get it?
07:43 πŸ”— godane i found it funny cause these sort of paths are used back in 2005
07:43 πŸ”— godane so if this more recent one works i may be able to get the older real media files
09:27 πŸ”— godane uploaded: https://archive.org/details/Better_Mind_The_Computer_BBC_Documentary
10:41 πŸ”— godane good news on the abcnews front
10:41 πŸ”— godane some missing episodes maybe saved by just grabbing the _embed version
11:15 πŸ”— Smiley sigh, vbox being a PITA again D:
13:33 πŸ”— godane i'm off to bed for now
13:33 πŸ”— godane i'm uploading the first 4 months of 2008 world news today
13:33 πŸ”— godane *tonight
13:42 πŸ”— SketchCow Hurrah
13:57 πŸ”— joepie91 haha, opened door to let cold air in
13:57 πŸ”— joepie91 followed immediately by accusing stare from my cat
16:39 πŸ”— joepie91 does anybody have a copy of the MediaDefender sources laying around, by any chance
16:39 πŸ”— joepie91 the torrents appear to have died...
16:39 πŸ”— joepie91 (another reason why torrents are not a suitable archival mechanism)
16:44 πŸ”— dashcloud I do
17:58 πŸ”— GLaDOS I believe SketchCow may be able to be indirectly credited for this http://ah.roosterteeth.com/archive/?id=8733
18:01 πŸ”— SmileyG this NEST stuff makes me laugh
18:01 πŸ”— SmileyG all these people with these $130 smoke detectors which will stop working the moment google gets bored.
18:10 πŸ”— joepie91 SmileyG: nest is one of those things that just makes me go "WHYYYYY"
18:10 πŸ”— joepie91 like, how could this possibly be a good/useful idea
18:14 πŸ”— morten77 hello my favorite archivists, how is the weekend so far?
18:14 πŸ”— xmc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0PtWLPmnTg - short video about the LOIRP guys
18:15 πŸ”— SmileyG morten77: slowly approaching the day of my babys birth, and also the day i end up unemployed.... so exciting and scary in equal amounts.
18:17 πŸ”— morten77 oh
18:18 πŸ”— morten77 I wonder how to archive website that loads parts of itself with ajax?
18:19 πŸ”— SmileyG morten77: painfully :D
18:20 πŸ”— morten77 I'm mostly thinking about slashdot primarly... webpages that don't really need any ajax but uses it anyway, there is no way you just request the whole page with all the comments for an article... you only get the first 100 comments
18:22 πŸ”— morten77 the rest have to be got with javascript, I can't just do a web.archive.org/record/ on them
18:24 πŸ”— morten77 And I really think now is the time to preserve all the good thoughts that have been written there, before dice destroys Slashdot completly. before it is too late... :(
18:30 πŸ”— morten77 SmileyG: so when it the planned date for the baby to see the day of light?
18:30 πŸ”— SmileyG 15th is the "date".
18:31 πŸ”— SmileyG I think she'll be here before then.
18:31 πŸ”— morten77 yeah you never know
18:36 πŸ”— yipdw morten77: actually it is possible
18:36 πŸ”— yipdw drop down to discussion system 1
18:37 πŸ”— yipdw which is the idea in https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/slashdot-grab
18:37 πŸ”— morten77 oh.
18:38 πŸ”— morten77 I didn't know there was a project for it. nice!
18:39 πŸ”— joepie91 <morten77>hello my favorite archivists, how is the weekend so far?
18:39 πŸ”— joepie91 not great :(
18:39 πŸ”— morten77 joepie91: what is not great?
18:42 πŸ”— joepie91 my weekend, heh
18:42 πŸ”— joepie91 my day so far has consisted of being frustrated at my shitty internet
18:42 πŸ”— ohhdemgir DFJustin, 94464 images from yandere, after going over original posts $(seq 1 279947) (includes things like https://yande.re/image/5ac8e5d3cfcd328e8b712fe1e58167c7/yande.re%20273254%20partial_scan.png)
19:46 πŸ”— nico f*** f*** f*** i deleted a client's primary vm
19:47 πŸ”— nico last working backup: 2/02/2014 f****
19:47 πŸ”— nico tomarrow will be really fine
21:14 πŸ”— joepie91 boo SketchCow, your domain WHOIS broke my WHOIS library :(
21:15 πŸ”— joepie91 like, almost completely
21:15 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
21:32 πŸ”— morten77 nico, time to look into undelete then?
21:38 πŸ”— nico every software i tried failed
21:38 πŸ”— nico they don't event see a hint
21:38 πŸ”— nico that these 2 files existed
22:33 πŸ”— joepie91 I hate it when this happens.
22:33 πŸ”— joepie91 http://owely.com/31oMois
22:35 πŸ”— xmc joepie91: what about it busted your whois library?
22:38 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: apparently my hotfix to work around a getting-stuck of the Python regex engine... broke the .at regex
22:38 πŸ”— joepie91 somehow
22:39 πŸ”— joepie91 I've removed the hotfix from NIC contact handle regexes, and added a FIXME
22:39 πŸ”— joepie91 worry for later
22:39 πŸ”— joepie91 All tests passed!
22:39 πŸ”— joepie91 :D
22:39 πŸ”— joepie91 monster commit incoming
22:40 πŸ”— * xmc nods quietly
22:40 πŸ”— xmc I really like the NAPTR dns record type
22:40 πŸ”— xmc it's just complex enough to be very interesting
22:41 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: https://github.com/joepie91/python-whois/commit/f2ce1d7b8ab566113a06c84259e35a36024974f8
22:42 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: I'm not sure I want to think about any more parsing tonight
22:42 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
22:42 πŸ”— xmc hahaha
22:42 πŸ”— joepie91 seriously
22:42 πŸ”— joepie91 regex parsing must have the lowest LOC/COC pay-off versus effort
22:43 πŸ”— joepie91 in all of software dev
22:43 πŸ”— joepie91 it can literally take 30 minutes to figure out that you need to add one damn character somewhere in a regex
22:43 πŸ”— joepie91 to make everything not break
22:43 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
22:43 πŸ”— xmc sounds about right
22:44 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: did I mention that there is one particular registrar that has an incredibly bad format
22:44 πŸ”— xmc point me to an example?
22:44 πŸ”— xmc also, only one?
22:44 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: https://github.com/joepie91/python-whois/blob/f2ce1d7b8ab566113a06c84259e35a36024974f8/test/data/communigal.net
22:44 πŸ”— joepie91 like, what the fuck, I don't even
22:44 πŸ”— joepie91 and it gets worse
22:44 πŸ”— joepie91 because they also have this
22:44 πŸ”— joepie91 https://github.com/joepie91/python-whois/blob/f2ce1d7b8ab566113a06c84259e35a36024974f8/test/data/365calendars.com
22:45 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: that said, AFNIC is pretty fucking awful too
22:45 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
22:45 πŸ”— xmc oh that's awesome
22:45 πŸ”— xmc who allowed these people on the internet
22:45 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: brace yourself
22:45 πŸ”— joepie91 https://github.com/joepie91/python-whois/blob/f2ce1d7b8ab566113a06c84259e35a36024974f8/test/data/ovh.fr
22:45 πŸ”— joepie91 AFNIC managed to build a format that is hard to parse for computers AND humans!
22:45 πŸ”— xmc that's kind of scungy, yeah
22:45 πŸ”— joepie91 pretty sure they solved some Hard Problem in software engineering there
22:45 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
22:46 πŸ”— joepie91 seriously, AFNIC is a pain
22:46 πŸ”— joepie91 also because of all the variation
22:46 πŸ”— joepie91 https://github.com/joepie91/python-whois/blob/master/pythonwhois/parse.py#L479-L481
22:46 πŸ”— joepie91 go figure, they're responsible for 3 out of 4 contact regexes
22:47 πŸ”— joepie91 and I've been unable to compress them into one regex without making it -completely- unmaintainable, heh
22:47 πŸ”— xmc sometimes multiple regexes are what you need
22:47 πŸ”— joepie91 yup :(
22:47 πŸ”— joepie91 but yeah, AFNIC kept me busy for... 3 hours? or so?
22:47 πŸ”— xmc I have a phone number formatting system
22:47 πŸ”— joepie91 figuring out all their wonky variations
22:48 πŸ”— joepie91 ?
22:48 πŸ”— xmc it consists of a sql table with a bunch of sql globs to match phone numbers
22:48 πŸ”— xmc and substitution rules to insert and remove digits and punctuation to make it human-recognizable as a phone number
22:48 πŸ”— joepie91 hehe
22:48 πŸ”— joepie91 it's not even really parsing
22:48 πŸ”— joepie91 :P
22:48 πŸ”— joepie91 just something pretending to do parsing
22:48 πŸ”— xmc lol
22:49 πŸ”— joepie91 (I've done that a few times)
22:49 πŸ”— xmc what country are you in, I can give an example format rule
22:49 πŸ”— xmc actually, what is your country's dialing code
22:49 πŸ”— xmc :P
22:49 πŸ”— joepie91 actually, pythonwhois' normalization isn't too different in that sense... it doesn't actually parse anything, just tries some 'best effort' normalization rules
22:49 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: +31
22:49 πŸ”— joepie91 Netherlands
22:49 πŸ”— joepie91 and we have about a quantizillion different ways of writing down phone numbers
22:49 πŸ”— xmc oh boy, that's a good one
22:49 πŸ”— xmc 1sec
22:49 πŸ”— joepie91 there's one "official" way but nobody actually uses that
22:50 πŸ”— joepie91 so that tells you how bad it is :P
22:50 πŸ”— xmc http://www.rafb.me/results/zpIgev70.html
22:50 πŸ”— * joepie91 is not entirely certain what he's looking at
22:50 πŸ”— joepie91 (also, those UUIDs do not at all look like UUIDs...)
22:51 πŸ”— xmc they are too uuids
22:51 πŸ”— xmc google_uuid is not, but that's google's fault
22:51 πŸ”— joepie91 they don't look random enough
22:51 πŸ”— joepie91 in fact
22:51 πŸ”— joepie91 it looks incremental
22:51 πŸ”— xmc they're v1 uuids, which have time and machine id as a component
22:51 πŸ”— xmc so can it
22:51 πŸ”— joepie91 surely that shouldn't have such a large impact on randomness?
22:51 πŸ”— joepie91 oh well :P
22:51 πŸ”— xmc anyway, match_string gets the digits
22:52 πŸ”— xmc then the underscore positions are distributed as in the other columns
22:52 πŸ”— joepie91 okay, and how do you deal with .31, +31, 0031, absence of 31
22:52 πŸ”— joepie91 etc
22:52 πŸ”— xmc I deal with that on ingest, everything is stored as full international but without the +
22:52 πŸ”— joepie91 mmm
22:53 πŸ”— joepie91 I'm not sure 090_ is valid
22:53 πŸ”— joepie91 I think it's 09__ nowadays
22:53 πŸ”— joepie91 not sure though
22:53 πŸ”— xmc orly, maybe I'll update that
22:53 πŸ”— joepie91 either way, forget about consistent spacing in NL phone numbers
22:53 πŸ”— xmc I usually only do it when I see something caught by my catchall rule
22:53 πŸ”— joepie91 people usually space them out in such a way that they're easy to remember
22:53 πŸ”— xmc fuckers
22:53 πŸ”— xmc why can't they conform to my rules
22:53 πŸ”— joepie91 so if there are repeated/related digits, that's how people space them
22:53 πŸ”— joepie91 also, xmc, you're doing it wrong with the 01__ etc
22:54 πŸ”— xmc oh yeah?
22:54 πŸ”— joepie91 every Dutch phone number is 10 digits total, with an area/type code of 3 or 4 digits (except for 06 which is for mobile numbers)
22:54 πŸ”— joepie91 however
22:54 πŸ”— joepie91 010 - something is not inherently different from 0165 - something
22:54 πŸ”— joepie91 it just has 7 local digits instead of 8
22:54 πŸ”— joepie91 it doesn't magically lack spacing
22:54 πŸ”— joepie91 :P
22:55 πŸ”— xmc hm, ok
22:55 πŸ”— joepie91 the official way is to not have spacing -at all- except for between the area/type code and local digits
22:55 πŸ”— xmc I usually get spacing rules from all the examples on the local telco regulatory agency's website
22:55 πŸ”— joepie91 and the spacing there should be a dash
22:55 πŸ”— joepie91 but as I said, nobody does that
22:55 πŸ”— joepie91 correct: 06-12345678
22:55 πŸ”— joepie91 correct: 010-1234567
22:55 πŸ”— xmc not examples, I mean, more like the "contact us" pages
22:55 πŸ”— joepie91 correct: 0165-123456
22:55 πŸ”— joepie91 incorrect: 0165 - 12 34 56
22:55 πŸ”— joepie91 (but everybody does something like that)
22:56 πŸ”— xmc hmm, thanks
22:56 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: I feel like I only made your job harder, by basically saying "there are no rules that anybody really follows"
22:56 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
22:56 πŸ”— xmc that's fine!
22:56 πŸ”— joepie91 personally I'd suggest to do the following for spacing (which is not 'official' but sensible to most people):
22:56 πŸ”— joepie91 06 - 1234 5678
22:56 πŸ”— joepie91 010 - 123 45 67
22:57 πŸ”— joepie91 0165 - 12 34 56
22:58 πŸ”— xmc cool, I'll note that down for next time I touch that dataset
23:00 πŸ”— joepie91 :)
23:00 πŸ”— xmc thanks for the deets. local knowledge is sadly lacking from that dataset
23:00 πŸ”— * joepie91 still needs to implement phone number normalization in pythonwhois...
23:00 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: heh, I can imagine
23:00 πŸ”— joepie91 local knowledge is tricky to come by really
23:00 πŸ”— xmc the goal was mostly to get close enough that google indexer would be able to match to typed in phone numbers
23:01 πŸ”— nico hoe
23:01 πŸ”— joepie91 hoe?
23:01 πŸ”— nico my domain name broke joepie91's whois lib ?
23:01 πŸ”— xmc I might be willing to share my rewrite rules with pythonwhois, contact me when you start working on that
23:01 πŸ”— * nico is reading the backlog
23:01 πŸ”— joepie91 nico: nah
23:01 πŸ”— joepie91 my change did
23:01 πŸ”— joepie91 I'm not sure how yet
23:01 πŸ”— joepie91 :p
23:01 πŸ”— joepie91 but it did
23:02 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: be aware that pythonwhois is licensed under the WTFPL, though :P
23:02 πŸ”— xmc noted
23:02 πŸ”— xmc my rewrite table is private and not yet licesenced to anyone
23:02 πŸ”— xmc fucking laggy coffeeshop wifi
23:02 πŸ”— joepie91 ah, you own the IP yourself?
23:02 πŸ”— xmc yeah I compile it myself from many sources
23:02 πŸ”— joepie91 I somehow assumed it was written for an employer of some sort
23:02 πŸ”— joepie91 :P
23:03 πŸ”— joepie91 also, new pythonwhois released!
23:03 πŸ”— xmc nope, hobby project
23:03 πŸ”— joepie91 ahh :)
23:03 πŸ”— xmc I have odd hobbies
23:05 πŸ”— nico joepie91: can you try boissonnet-rousseau.com with your lib?
23:05 πŸ”— nico it has Whois Server: whois.ovh.com
23:06 πŸ”— joepie91 OVH should be supported
23:06 πŸ”— joepie91 seems to work fine
23:06 πŸ”— joepie91 http://sprunge.us/UjRg
23:06 πŸ”— joepie91 hm
23:06 πŸ”— joepie91 the city and postal code are mixed up?
23:06 πŸ”— joepie91 that's an odd one
23:06 πŸ”— nico aix en provence, 13100
23:07 πŸ”— joepie91 just a moment
23:07 πŸ”— nico let me check another ovh owned domain
23:07 πŸ”— nico yes
23:07 πŸ”— nico it is an ovh fuckup
23:07 πŸ”— nico same things on 1pacte.net
23:07 πŸ”— joepie91 I have an OVH testcase
23:07 πŸ”— joepie91 so unless it's a once-off fuckup
23:07 πŸ”— joepie91 it's a problem in my testcase
23:07 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
23:08 πŸ”— xmc oh also.
23:08 πŸ”— xmc postal addresses: don't even try
23:08 πŸ”— joepie91 nico, from the testcase: 59053, Roubaix Cedex 1
23:08 πŸ”— joepie91 so this seems like an inconsistency within OVH, perhaps?
23:09 πŸ”— xmc I went to school for geography and we had a few weeks in class where we talked about postal addresses
23:09 πŸ”— * nico check the domain of his clients
23:09 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: hehe
23:09 πŸ”— xmc the best way to do postal addresses is a multiline text field
23:09 πŸ”— joepie91 what?
23:09 πŸ”— xmc don't even try to validate, it's actually impossible without sending a letter in the mail and seeing if it gets there
23:09 πŸ”— morten77 :-)
23:10 πŸ”— joepie91 nico: I think it's inconsistent within OVH, not sure how to deal with that
23:10 πŸ”— nico littoral-bureautique.com is also city, postal code
23:10 πŸ”— joepie91 fucking OVH
23:10 πŸ”— joepie91 that's the third time they're giving me a headache
23:10 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: hehe
23:10 πŸ”— nico xmc: it is an invalid test
23:10 πŸ”— xmc sounds like you should not be allowed to levy the Internet Death Penalty, because you'd probably use it everywhere
23:10 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: do postal codes always begin with a number?
23:10 πŸ”— joepie91 haha
23:11 πŸ”— morten77 I read the other day a page about database programmers false assumptions of peoples name.. it was quite fun
23:11 πŸ”— nico in france you can send a mail to an totally wrong address
23:11 πŸ”— xmc joepie91: no! canada they are e.g. V6A 2V8
23:11 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
23:11 πŸ”— joepie91 oh goddamnit
23:11 πŸ”— nico and if the name is remotly associated to something laposte know
23:11 πŸ”— xmc hahahahaha
23:11 πŸ”— joepie91 let me ask this differently
23:11 πŸ”— joepie91 does a postal code always contain a number
23:11 πŸ”— nico they will override the address
23:11 πŸ”— nico :)
23:11 πŸ”— xmc joepie91: not necessarily
23:11 πŸ”— * joepie91 braces for "haha no"
23:11 πŸ”— nico joepie91: no
23:11 πŸ”— nico 13800 cedex 1
23:11 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: okay, so how the fuck do I tell a postal code apart from a city
23:11 πŸ”— nico :)
23:11 πŸ”— joepie91 "you don't"
23:11 πŸ”— xmc joepie91: "exercise for the reader"
23:12 πŸ”— joepie91 I know, but how do I do it anyway
23:12 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
23:12 πŸ”— joepie91 know what
23:12 πŸ”— joepie91 heuristics time
23:12 πŸ”— xmc en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_postal_codes
23:12 πŸ”— joepie91 if A contains numbers and B doesn't, or A is shorter than B, then A is probably the postal code
23:12 πŸ”— joepie91 good enough for this corner case
23:13 πŸ”— xmc possible.
23:13 πŸ”— xmc but
23:13 πŸ”— joepie91 too bad for people living in 4-letter-cities that happen to have services with OVH and have their data turned around
23:13 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
23:13 πŸ”— morten77 I guess there can be cities that have numbers in their name.... bad city names
23:13 πŸ”— xmc also short city names
23:13 πŸ”— joepie91 morten77: don't make me think about this please
23:13 πŸ”— joepie91 it's past midnight :(
23:13 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: the goal of pythonwhois is 100% format support, best-effort accuracy
23:14 πŸ”— xmc aye
23:14 πŸ”— joepie91 I'd say that my heuristics are probably good enough :P
23:14 πŸ”— joepie91 not perfect
23:14 πŸ”— joepie91 but good enough
23:14 πŸ”— xmc yes, the problem is insoluble in the general case
23:14 πŸ”— joepie91 I mean, really, how many people live in cities that have less than 5 characters AND have a number in the name
23:14 πŸ”— nico city: Koné postal code: 98860
23:15 πŸ”— joepie91 nico: doesn't have a number in the city name
23:15 πŸ”— xmc joepie91: sounds like you need to do a statistical survey of whois entries
23:15 πŸ”— joepie91 so it'd declare kone to be the city
23:15 πŸ”— xmc ah, AND
23:15 πŸ”— joepie91 not quite
23:15 πŸ”— joepie91 attempt 1: XOR for numbers
23:15 πŸ”— joepie91 (that is, if one and only one has numbers, that's the postal)
23:15 πŸ”— joepie91 attempt 2: if that fails, the shorter one is the postal code
23:16 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: honestly, there's already a few heuristics hacks like this in the normalization code, and it's working out fairly well
23:16 πŸ”— xmc it looks like per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_postal_codes all postal code systems have at least one digit
23:16 πŸ”— joepie91 AA NN for street addresses, AA AA for P.O. Box addresses. The second half of the postcode identifies the street delivery walk (e.g.: Hamilton HM 12) or the PO Box number range (e.g.: Hamilton HM BX). See Postal codes in Bermuda.
23:16 πŸ”— joepie91 fuck you, Bermuda :(
23:17 πŸ”— xmc oh right, AA AA
23:17 πŸ”— xmc ick
23:17 πŸ”— xmc well they can deal
23:17 πŸ”— xmc might want to have "has a number or is all uppercase"
23:17 πŸ”— xmc but how many people are using ovh from bermuda anyway
23:17 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: lots of registrars put EVERYTHING IN UPPER CASE
23:17 πŸ”— joepie91 so yeah :P
23:18 πŸ”— xmc but does ovh?
23:18 πŸ”— morten77 caps lock for the win
23:18 πŸ”— joepie91 there's a reason that normalization code is there
23:18 πŸ”— joepie91 xmc: on some registries, yes
23:18 πŸ”— xmc icko
23:18 πŸ”— nico xmc: ovh is doing everything it can
23:18 πŸ”— nico to annoy you
23:18 πŸ”— nico multiple time
23:18 πŸ”— xmc sounds like
23:19 πŸ”— xmc here, joepie91: http://www.upu.int/en/activities/addressing/postal-addressing-systems-in-member-countries.html
23:20 πŸ”— * joepie91 doesn't want to click that
23:20 πŸ”— joepie91 seriously though
23:20 πŸ”— morten77 "39. People whose names break my system are weird outliers.  They should have had solid, acceptable names, like 田À¸­Γ₯Β€ΒͺΓ©ΒƒΒŽ."
23:20 πŸ”— joepie91 nico: can you create a ticket on the github repo so that I don't forget
23:20 πŸ”— xmc ah, the bermuda AA AA is for post office boxes only
23:20 πŸ”— joepie91 and I'll implement the postal code heuristics tomorrow
23:21 πŸ”— joepie91 preferably with a few test domains :P
23:23 πŸ”— * joepie91 prods nico
23:23 πŸ”— joepie91 mm, need sleep
23:23 πŸ”— joepie91 goodnight all :P
23:25 πŸ”— xmc goodnight joepie91
23:54 πŸ”— midas so, fixed one part only to kill the next one..
23:55 πŸ”— midas this isnt going to be my night
irclogger-viewer