[00:50] ! [00:50] wget --output-document=/dev/null http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test500.zip [00:51] Download Speed: 34185 kbps (4273.1 KB/sec transfer rate) [00:51] Upload Speed: 5829 kbps (728.6 KB/sec transfer rate) [01:18] sure you can [01:18] à² _à² [02:17] man... largely due to my s3 usage, my aws bill for may is a bit painful [02:18] 89.77 just for the s3 stuff. i'm glad i've finally cleared it out [03:06] Coderjoe: maybe rackspace cloud would be cheaper [03:06] ? [03:06] they charge for data output [03:06] $0.0015/GB [03:31] hard drive prices etc [03:45] i didn't need the data to remain hosted in the clown. I just needed somewhere to stash it a number of months ago to get it off ec2. now it is all down to a local drive. [04:10] Trust in the clown [04:20] http://boingboing.net/2012/05/31/the-mysterious-mr-hokum.html#disqus_thread [04:20] Oh, I can always depend on BoingBoing to have the loudest, most complainy commenters. [04:53] Coderjoe: that's like my total AWS bill [04:53] SPEAKING OF WHICH I should transfer fujoshi over someday soon [05:20] well, it is expensive to stash 500GB in s3 :-\ [05:28] SketchCow: i didnt even start that conversation, but okay ... [05:28] might as well ban winr4r for starting it [05:34] Nah [05:34] winr4r is awesome. [05:35] cute [05:37] get on my case about going offtopic when all your minions go offtopic all the time? i don't get it [05:49] http://cardsagainsthumanity.com/ [05:49] best game [06:55] SketchCow: aw, i love you too [06:55] sorry if i did actually go off-topic in there [06:57] SketchCow: haha, you really know when interest starts to sway away from writing, don't ya [06:57] I was just starting skimmin' in the git-annex post when you wrote "Am I losing you? Keep with it" [07:12] i am doing the exact opposite thing of understanding what git-annex does [07:13] but jason says it's awesome, so it is [07:28] I was going to inform idiot that winr4r has done dozens of great things by and for me and for archive team. [07:28] Su has done not much more than run a couple clients and filled the channels with nonsense, just absolutely nonsense, for days on end. [07:30] It's different going off-topic when you actually make sense :) [07:31] spewing random crap all over? not cool [07:38] why the fuck is plugin-container using 1.1GB of ram [07:38] fucking terminating that shit [07:39] flash being flash, it likes memory. you got memory [07:39] om nom nom [07:39] I hate flash [07:39] :( [07:39] I'm very confident flash hates us all in return [07:39] :D [07:40] lol [07:44] SketchCow: thank you [07:45] ersi: ever been in a relationship where you're just too scared to get out, or practical concerns and your situation at the time make it really really hard to do so, and the other person knows that, plus has a kind of asshole streak so treats you like shit just because it can? [07:45] that is exactly what flash is like [07:47] Yupp. Been there, done that [07:47] and it's going to be around for at least as long as H.264 stays patented [07:48] flash is more than video, though [07:48] javascript solutions are making good progress though [07:48] for the 'other things flash do' [07:48] Do people actually watch hour long porn videos for the plot? [07:48] Like, I never understood why they make two hour porn flicks [07:48] I know some chicks that dig the plots [07:48] with a 10 minute sex scene [07:49] ersi: yes it is, but that's the only place that i see that HTML5 *can't* kill it off [07:49] not that I've watched said movies >.> [07:49] It's like having a line in a photograph that lead you into the picture [07:51] undersco2: do they even exist? [07:51] definitely [07:51] yeah [07:51] undersco2: maybe it's so people can convince *themselves* that they're not just watching it for the boning [07:51] probably [07:51] you know, playboy having articles and all [07:52] like those people who read playboy for the articles [07:52] yeah [07:52] hahahahaha [07:52] hahahaha [07:52] this conversation just keeps on rockin' [07:52] Sodom.and.Gomorrah.1994.DVDRip.avi [07:53] Hell yes, porn that's as old as me [07:53] VHS style [07:53] undersco2: caligula [07:53] (also, despite the title, it's straight, apparently) [07:53] which is actually older than me i think [07:53] oh, wait there's girl-on-girl too [07:53] I have some 1920s and 30s dutch selections [07:53] undersco2: does the LORD kill everyone at the end? [07:53] i mean that'd be an awful boner-killer [07:54] it's interesting to see what they thought was risque then [07:54] hahahahaha [07:54] that would be the best porno [07:54] girl on girl actio-FIRE AND BRIMSTONE FROM THE LORD [07:54] :D [07:54] fuck [07:54] I should go get some sleep [07:54] final tomorrow [07:54] and cisco certification exams [07:55] fuck me [07:55] i already had my two hours, i'm good [07:55] two hours lol [07:55] good luck with your exam :) [07:55] thanks :) [07:56] ciscin' it up [08:41] Hmm [08:41] any porn sites running html5 video yet? [08:41] Once that happens, flash will start dying imo [08:42] Porn runs the internet. [09:16] that'll suck for firefox users if it happens [09:16] and chrome users, once they finally kill off H.264 support [09:16] because of the codec mess [09:18] hmmm [09:19] the problem is, to have it work on all the major browsers, you need to encode it two different ways [09:19] what does youtube do their html5 stuff in? [09:19] WebM, H.264 [09:19] SmileyG: youtube uses both, but they also have a shitload of resources [09:19] because that works for me. [09:19] winr4r: and the porn companies don't? [09:19] SmileyG: what they have now is a solution that works for like 98% of desktop/laptop browsers [09:19] they were doing video streaming long before youtube :) [09:19] i.e. flash [09:20] yah [09:20] the codec crap is stupid and I don't know what to do about it [09:20] commit suicide [09:20] it's the only way out [09:21] LOL [09:21] also, flash supports H.264, as i recall, so to target *everything* other than desktops without flash installed, that's the only way you need to encode it [09:21] but that's still very dependent on flash existing [09:22] (*everything* includes smartphones, which usually have H.264 hardware decoders) [09:25] porn sites might even be using HTML5 video already, actually, given how big the ipad/phone market is [09:46] (i honestly, and i do mean honestly, would not know) [10:03] the weekend is near, so you have a fun project [10:45] o_O? [10:45] check all the porn sites for use of html5? [10:55] all of them. [11:11] it's been quite long since I saw people discuss this utterly boring crappy topic [11:14] yes [11:14] i feel bad about that because zzzz boring topic [11:18] in my own little way, i have made the internet a less fun place [11:32] I think I know how I am going to pay for college [11:32] 1. start a youtube-clone porn site that uses html5 [11:32] 2. all the geeks will flock to it because it uses html5 [11:32] 3. ???????? [11:32] 4. profit [11:34] undersco2: you're a fucking genius! [11:34] hahaha [11:34] brb, patent [11:34] everyone knows geeks are the biggest porn market segment too [11:34] shouldn't you be sleeping? [11:35] just got up for school [11:35] on my way out the door [11:36] yeah, i'm sure you're actually walking outside with your laptop balanced on a palm, typing one handed, as we speak [11:36] but seriously, good luck today, though i doubt you'll need it :) [11:36] good lucjk with your exam [14:36] Good morning. [14:50] good morning jason! [14:51] i'm saying that as if you've actually been to sleep [14:51] which you haven't done, ever [20:08] whee. the youtube fishing emails have changed tactics again. now they're sending out even-more-plausible "inbox full" messages. (I'd never seen a legitimate version of either of the other two. but then I haven't seen an inbox full message either) [21:00] TO: you@gmail.com [21:00] Your inbox is full. [21:01] * chronomex points outlook at his imap account [21:01] * chronomex watches outlook cry