[01:39] http://imgur.com/gallery/B7FOZ [01:39] That's... moving. [01:43] indeed [01:50] good comments too, damn [03:11] http://i.imgur.com/8F1XS.jpg [03:29] http://www.batslyadams.com/2012/12/snes-ethernet-adapter-la-gamespace.html?m=1 [05:46] http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mejvbsasd21rr6y0ao1_400.png [06:53] lol [12:38] joepie91: Around? [12:38] joepie91: Just saw this in #batcave @ Vox [12:38] ohai [12:38] [13:34:51] <&renode> !INVITE M0X1 [12:38] [13:37:52] <&renode> join #python [12:39] wtf [12:39] ? [12:39] what's weird about that>? [12:39] they interconnect between anonops [12:39] yes, relay bot [12:39] and vox [12:39] yeah [12:39] is Vox this desperate? [12:39] nah, there have been relay bots for a while [12:39] ah [12:39] one of them, u, is also on cryto [12:39] Yeah [12:39] interconnects with a bunch of clearnet networks (including cryto), irc2p, and anonet [12:40] I see [12:40] so it's not because of the recent changes then [12:40] probably not [12:40] also, u is a fucking awesome bot [12:40] I see [12:40] possibly the best relay bot I've ever seen [12:40] Well, I have a minimal eggdrop with some nice tools [12:40] non-obtrusive network/name prefixes etc [12:40] but nothing extraordinary [12:40] :P [12:40] idk, u is just pleasant to read [12:40] What does it do? [12:40] I see [12:41] I don't know 'u' I was curious [12:41] gives ideas what I could implement [12:41] norbert79: http://owely.com/11ovzmO [12:41] look at the way it displays the user and the network [12:42] (and yeah, I need to clean up tabs, I know) [12:42] Holy sss... is that your IRC client? :D [12:42] ya [12:42] holy yeah :D [12:42] it's quite suitable for "power users" [12:42] :P [12:42] but yeah, u's text basically reads as if it's just another user talking [12:42] you don't have to look twice to determine who's talking [12:42] Neat [12:43] like with renode [12:43] much more pleasant this way [12:43] also, let me show you something cool in this IRC client, sec :P [12:43] Sure [12:44] norbert79: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJgrrp367wo [12:45] (that's on irc2p, that's why it takes so long for it to actually try and kick someone) [12:45] Selective autotab-autocomplete [12:45] what's irc2p? [12:45] the main IRC network on i2p [12:45] http://i2p2.de/ [12:45] a darknet of sorts [12:45] ah [12:45] norbert79: pretty much [12:45] and it has autocomplete specific to functionality [12:46] so it will have channels, users, or both in the list depending on what kind of command it is [12:46] and if you do for example /ctcp [12:46] it will list version, ping, finger, time [12:46] it effectively autocompletes everything [12:46] it's quite awesome. [12:46] joepie91: I think irssi works the same way [12:46] irssi doesn't have an IDE-like autocomplete popup :) [12:46] let me check [12:46] which makes a massive difference imo [12:46] that? No, of course :) [12:47] I feel almost blind when using xchat or similar clients [12:47] pfff, intellisense for irc is a stupid idea [12:47] but I prefer no selection list, it would, I don't know, disturb me :) [12:47] "how many more times do I have to hit tab to get the right nick" [12:47] so you type enough to make it unique :P [12:47] joe->TAB->Done :)) [12:47] ^ [12:47] norbert79: try that in #lowendbox [12:47] on freenode [12:47] lol, let me see [12:47] you'll always higlight JoeMerit [12:47] lol [12:48] people frequently make this mistake [12:48] irssi orders the list by most-recently-spoke [12:48] Hmmm, wonder if that's *the* MadHatter that *I* know [12:48] the problem is that it isn't always clear how many chars you have to type to have the right nick [12:48] and it's easier to just joe [12:48] Not so serious there either [12:48] chronomex: both JoeMerit and I talk a lot [12:48] it's managebale [12:48] ah, right [12:48] ok [12:48] whatever [12:48] joem :) [12:48] you use your client, I use mine [12:48] problem solved! [12:48] heh indeed [12:49] I am interested though in other methods, I like to discuss about what's in for me [12:49] anwyay, a more important feature of nettalk imo, is multitab [12:49] er [12:49] multiline tab [12:49] Yes, that looks nice [12:49] I misread multitab as matlab somehow [12:49] xchat simply will not do multiple lines of tabs [12:49] which is a giant pain if you want to keep an eye on a lot of channels [12:49] I suppose that's from it being almost 5am [12:49] haha chronomex [12:49] chronomex: Hah, CET time for us :) [12:49] and not having my glasses on [12:50] what time of day is CET right now? [12:50] almost 2pm [12:50] hmm [12:50] Thu Dec 6 13:50:15 CET 2012 [12:50] but yeah, the main reasons I use nettalk are probably the multiline tabs, IDE-like autocompletion, highlights/PMs in the status bar, and the awesomely simple network management (including auto-reconnect and auto-rejoin and automatically remembering all networks and channels etc) [12:50] and also the fast-scroll thingie [12:50] meh, irssi ftw [12:50] keep middle mouse button pressed, move mouse up, extremely fast scrolling [12:50] irssi is nice indeed, though yes, autotab-selection list is nice too [12:50] very useful to read back large backlogs [12:51] (especially when you can do speedreading) [12:51] irc or ircII for the win! :P [12:51] boy I used ircII a lot back in 1999 [12:51] never used those :P [12:51] ircII is the predecessor of irssi [12:52] lacks window handling in default, or is harder to make it work [12:52] I see [12:52] I don't like irssi :( [12:52] if on terminal, weechat [12:52] weechat is pretty spiffy [12:52] what's wrong with irssi which you don't like in it? [12:52] out of the box, it's a very cumbersome client [12:52] no nick list or anything, the commands are a bit odd (can't recall which ones in particular) [12:53] and I don't want to spend a gazillion years on customizing it when I have weechat which does it out of the box [12:53] well, /w works nice, normally I don't look for the nicklists often [12:53] I do :P [12:53] /names ;) [12:53] well, customizing was easy for me, but yeah, it took a bit to finish the config file [12:53] or that, but I prefer /w :) [12:53] shorter [12:53] anyway, if I have a graphical interface, always nettalk [12:54] hell, I actually run it through WINE [12:54] (and yes, that works beautifully) [12:54] I used to use Wine a lot, still doing it [12:54] but I prefer binary for the OS, where possible [12:55] the only catch of running nettalk via WINE is that changing the icon for a tab makes the IRC client lag for a tiny bit... if you have a lot of highlights/PMs at once, that makes it hard to use [12:55] but that appears to be a bug in WINE [12:55] since the problem doesn't exist on Windows [12:55] yes [12:55] I was actually working on writing my own IRC client [12:55] mostly based off how Nettalk works [12:55] but in Python [12:55] (Nettalk is, believe it or not, written in VB6) [12:58] Not all that strange, considering it's a program, made ages ago, primarily to run on Windows. [13:00] ytalk for the win :) [13:03] goddamn fucking youtube [13:03] http://owely.com/7AvXZE [13:03] seriously [13:03] STOP BLOCKING THAT FUCKING VIDEO [13:04] this is the 3rd damn dispute I have to open [13:04] on what grounds are they blocking it? [13:04] copyright, of course [13:04] legitimately? [13:04] what happened in the Netherlands? [13:04] no [13:05] Traffic accident? [13:05] the original video is owned by the NOS [13:05] dutch PBS [13:05] I subtitled it back then [13:05] and uploaded it [13:05] because there were no english videos [13:05] and people were wondering wtf was going on [13:05] since then, 3 foreign news agencies have tried to block it [13:05] wtf [13:05] completely fucking ridiculous [13:05] indeed [13:06] norbert79: alleged "attack" on queensday a few years ago [13:06] anyway, sent in my third goddamn dispute [13:06] I'm getting so sick of this fingerprinting bullshit [13:06] "woo it has subs and it's about the queensday incident, THAT MUST BE OURS" [13:07] oooo mine [13:08] * joepie91 is pissed [15:18] joepie91: throw it on archive.org [15:22] DFJustin: I don't have the original anymore [15:22] youtube now lets you download your own originals back [15:22] not if they're blocked for copyright. [15:23] yeah probably :/ [15:23] He said, this this mitigated it. [15:23] Allowing downloads of originals is a big deal. [15:23] and a nice change. [15:23] I wonder how the 4k videos are doing. [15:23] but for future reference: http://dataliberation.blogspot.com/2012/09/your-youtube-original-videos-now.html [15:24] http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5BF9E09ECEC8F88F [15:24] They're doing fiiiiine [16:03] are those complete or random http://archive.org/details/twitterstream ? [16:05] Explain complete or random in that context. [16:05] They're all I currently have in the hopper. [16:05] They were extracted with basic developer tools by swebb. [16:05] So they're not complete like "every tweet that month" [16:05] i mean if it contains all tweets from that period or a subset [16:05] aye [16:05] cheers [16:45] Schbirid: Those tweets are form the 'spritzer' feed that Twitter provides for free. It's like 2% of all tweets. [16:46] BTW, according to their terms of service, they don't want anyone redistributing tweets in full. [16:46] Yeah. [16:46] Fuuuuuuuuucker [16:47] Yea, the twitter TOS are pretty strict about the data. [16:47] ah, i see [16:47] However, I'm continuing to collect the tweets so when they do change their TOS or they go out of business, I still have the data. [17:05] isn't the LoC getting all of Twitter's public stream? [17:05] Supposedly [17:06] They are. [17:06] I've talked with them. [17:06] If you go down there, you can look at it. [17:06] But not online. [17:12] The LoC is getting the firehouse and all historical tweets since the first tweet. [17:12] firehose, not firehouse. [17:14] FIREHOUSE [17:15] That's us. [18:23] http://www.failclipz.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TVshow.gif [21:28] what is this I don't even [21:28] haha, wat [21:50] I'm BlueMax, thought you knew me chronomex [21:50] ? [21:51] I know you just fine [21:52] BlueMax: http://www.failclipz.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/TVshow.gif [21:52] Oh, it makes perfect sense to me now. [21:52] oh I didn't see that [21:53] I see SketchCow anticipated this situation and provided the gif in advance [21:57] hahaha [21:59] that's the only logical conclusion available [22:00] he does like to make me look the fool [22:00] especially in advance [22:04] the sneaky devil [22:19] https://twitter.com/joepie91/status/276812498936688640 [22:20] Holy cow, a post form the future! [22:20] Also, why didn't you just link to the link instead of twitter :(