#archiveteam-bs 2013-07-10,Wed

↑back Search

Time Nickname Message
01:26 🔗 omf_ Just got a slot opened at a conference for me to give a talk and I currently have no idea :(
01:32 🔗 omf_ wait never mind I just remembered I am doing a documentation talk
01:33 🔗 omf_ I need to get more sleep -_-
06:32 🔗 godane uploaded: https://archive.org/details/cdrom-linuxformatmagazine-88
06:38 🔗 godane so i'm trying to make cdrom-linuxformatmagazine-94 item
06:39 🔗 godane but there is no folder when i login using gftp
06:40 🔗 godane they say that if i don't see the folder i may have login to the wrong server
06:41 🔗 godane but that can't be right cause i'm connecting to items-uploads.archive.org all the time with gftp
06:42 🔗 godane i just made the folder for it
06:42 🔗 godane hope that works
07:19 🔗 godane so i found boot magazine cds again
07:20 🔗 godane this time its the complete set
08:25 🔗 omf_ This usb to sata adapter is working out nicely for using an internal bluray drive as an external
08:25 🔗 omf_ and it only cost $12
08:48 🔗 godane so i found some more lost episodes of spark
08:48 🔗 godane episodes 91, 69, 68, and 57
08:50 🔗 godane and episodes 54 and 53
08:50 🔗 godane these are going to be the sparklike versions
08:50 🔗 godane *sparklite
09:16 🔗 ersi joepie91: Because I'm goin' there
09:25 🔗 BlueMax don't go there! *canned laughter*
10:12 🔗 BlueMax http://archives.thebbs.org/ lots of BBS software here
13:11 🔗 godane http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/cats-and-their-brain-controlling-parasites-are-targeting-your-children
13:18 🔗 BlueMax What.
13:21 🔗 godane there say OCD can be cause by cat poop
13:22 🔗 GLaDOS Just claim everything is caused by cat poop.
13:23 🔗 GLaDOS They won't be able to tell whether you're joking or not.
13:53 🔗 SmileyG cat poop, indeed
13:53 🔗 SmileyG toxoplasmosis.
13:54 🔗 SmileyG Then we realise, the human race began rapidly evolving? around 3000bc
13:54 🔗 SmileyG around the same time the egyptians began keeping cats.
13:54 🔗 SmileyG :O
14:07 🔗 Baljem of course, none of this is news to cats. they already know they're responsible for the whole of creation.
14:12 🔗 godane i'm starting uploaded the unpubic g4tv.com videos
14:19 🔗 godane g4tv.com-video1661: Audiofile talks with Johnny Deep: https://archive.org/details/g4tv.com-video1661
14:19 🔗 godane i added techtv lost clips as a keyword
14:20 🔗 godane this is so people will be able to see the techtv lost videos easyier
14:23 🔗 godane http://durham.io/2013/07/09/seth-vidal-creator-of-yum-open-source-software-killed-in-bike-accident-off-hillandale-rd/
14:24 🔗 ersi Yeah, quite sad :(
14:25 🔗 ersi Wtf, human.io got bought by WALMART?
14:26 🔗 ersi rawr
14:28 🔗 godane i have 23 items waiting to be derive
14:28 🔗 godane :-/
14:28 🔗 ersi They'll get done, don't worry :)
14:29 🔗 godane i know
14:33 🔗 ersi https://soundcloud.com/bloes-brothers/bloes-brothers-4-bakermat
14:33 🔗 ersi Listen to that, it'll make ya' relax for sure ^_^
15:10 🔗 SketchCow BlueMax: He's gotten them from me. (BBS Archives)
15:10 🔗 BlueMax oh. cool.
15:11 🔗 BlueMax also, hi!
15:14 🔗 godane now you can see g4tv.com unpublic video ids: https://archive.org/search.php?query=collection%3Ag4video-web%20AND%20subject%3A%22G4TV.com%20unpublic%20video%20ids%22&sort=-publicdate
15:30 🔗 godane g4tv.com-video1759: CD-R Media Guide: https://archive.org/details/g4tv.com-video1759
16:03 🔗 godane g4tv.com-video1936: webcast: https://archive.org/details/g4tv.com-video1936
16:03 🔗 godane so i got the techtv webcast videos
16:11 🔗 godane so i'm getting maximum pc 2003 cds
16:11 🔗 joepie91 ersi: aha :P
16:12 🔗 joepie91 ersi: if I am not mistaken, the enthusiasm of potential Dutch visitors kind of died down when they realized it was sponsored by FoxIT
16:12 🔗 joepie91 OHM, I mean
16:12 🔗 godane if i get the boot magazine cds and the first 4 years of maximum pc
16:13 🔗 godane i may get up to 1996 to 2003 of boot magazine + maximum pc cds
16:13 🔗 godane and that will be the full set
16:30 🔗 ersi joepie91: What does that has to do with anything? FoxIT doesn't own it for a single eurocent
16:30 🔗 ersi joepie91: It'll be just as nice as HAR and the previous events :) the organisers are awesome
16:45 🔗 joepie91 ersi: FoxIT has a history of very very VERY questionable morals, and whenever they touch things it tends to turn out not very nice
16:46 🔗 joepie91 so I can understand the hesitation by others
16:46 🔗 joepie91 unrelated, is there already some kind of github archiving in progress?
16:48 🔗 ivan` someone in #archiveteam put 10TB of repos onto their own drives
16:48 🔗 ivan` that's about half of github
16:48 🔗 joepie91 is it being kept up to date?
16:48 🔗 ivan` no
16:48 🔗 joepie91 because I thought of a potential backup strategy
16:48 🔗 joepie91 that includes keeping it up to date
16:49 🔗 ivan` I'm thinking about writing a distributed system for backing up youtube and github and such
16:49 🔗 joepie91 ie. store the repositories locally in compressed format, and keep track of the current position of every branch
16:49 🔗 joepie91 separately
16:49 🔗 ivan` git already does that
16:49 🔗 joepie91 git doesn't compress everything
16:49 🔗 joepie91 and not as effectively as it could be doing it
16:49 🔗 ivan` you just git fetch to update
16:49 🔗 joepie91 due to speed concerns
16:49 🔗 ivan` git packs objects
16:50 🔗 ivan` you can make it pack with a bigger window
16:50 🔗 ivan` though it's already pretty big
16:51 🔗 joepie91 ivan`: bzip2 is considerably better at compressing text-ish data than zlib (which git uses), if I'm not mistaken
16:51 🔗 joepie91 at the cost of a significantly larger time requirement
16:51 🔗 joepie91 which is probably why git doesn't use bz2
16:51 🔗 ivan` yeah, you're right, that could help
16:51 🔗 joepie91 my idea was to keep all repositories compressed in bzip2 format and then decompress when an update has to occur and then recompress for storage
16:52 🔗 ivan` or just modify git to support bz2 ;)
16:52 🔗 joepie91 since you can keep track of the branch tips independently (and that's very small data) that should be quite feasible
16:52 🔗 ivan` or lzma2
16:52 🔗 joepie91 ivan`: wouldn't that basically just break compatibility with everyone elses git?
16:52 🔗 joepie91 I can imagine that would be a disaster to restore
16:53 🔗 ivan` git clone --no-bz2-packing weird-repo
16:55 🔗 ivan` (yeah they'd need the bz2-supporting git if they only had the raw data, but it's the same when you "store the repositories locally in compressed format")
16:56 🔗 joepie91 not quite
16:56 🔗 joepie91 if you just throw an entire repo in a .bz2 anyone could use standard installed-from-repo-or-otherwise bz2 to unpack it
16:57 🔗 ivan` ah, right
16:57 🔗 joepie91 setting up some kind of custom bz2 git means you'd have to maintain a custom git branch
16:57 🔗 joepie91 and repackage it constantly
16:57 🔗 joepie91 to keep up to date with the 'normal' git
16:57 🔗 joepie91 unless bz2 gets merged into mainline git, which I don't see happening any time soon :P
16:57 🔗 ivan` in that case it would be interesting to try to keep the objects packed without zlib
16:57 🔗 ivan` you wouldn't want to create a million files on extraction
16:58 🔗 joepie91 http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/How-to-prevent-Git-from-compressing-certain-files-td3305492.html
16:58 🔗 joepie91 You almost certainly don't want zlib compression on your jpegs, as they
16:58 🔗 joepie91 are already compressed. You can turn off zlib compression entirely by
16:58 🔗 joepie91 compressing your commit messages).
16:58 🔗 joepie91 compressing your text (and even in a photos-only repo, you are not
16:58 🔗 joepie91 for _all_ objects, which means in a mixed-use repo you won't be
16:58 🔗 joepie91 setting core.compression to 0. Unfortunately, this turns off compression
16:59 🔗 joepie91 it also hints at the possibility to turn off delta compression
16:59 🔗 godane g4tv.com-video1981: Liam Mayclem interviews Michael Robertson: https://archive.org/details/g4tv.com-video1981
17:00 🔗 ivan` joepie91: great, I like your idea then
17:00 🔗 joepie91 the gotcha here, of course, is github side data
17:00 🔗 joepie91 :)
17:02 🔗 joepie91 also, thoughts on archiving 4chan?
17:02 🔗 ivan` closure has github-backup which grabs github-side data
17:02 🔗 ivan` too bad I refuse to run Haskell code because all the Haskellers execute random untrusted code grabbed over HTTP
17:02 🔗 joepie91 yeah, I ran across that
17:02 🔗 joepie91 ironically, hosted on github
17:02 🔗 joepie91 but that aside
17:02 🔗 joepie91 I don't think storing metadata in a language-specific serialization format is anywhere remotely near my definition of a "good idea"
17:02 🔗 joepie91 :P
17:03 🔗 ivan` heh, it does that?
17:03 🔗 joepie91 pretty sure it stores stuff in haskell serialiation format
17:03 🔗 joepie91 serialization *
17:03 🔗 joepie91 which, quite honestly, is a really fucking stupid idea
17:04 🔗 joepie91 I mean, I don't like XML, but it would've been a better idea here than haskell serialized something
17:04 🔗 joepie91 also, this is about the github-backup referenced from the AT wiki
17:04 🔗 joepie91 there are supposedly a few projects with the same name
17:05 🔗 joepie91 https://github.com/joeyh/github-backup
17:05 🔗 joepie91 The format of the files in the github branch is currently Haskell serialized data types. This is plain text, and readable, if you squint.
17:09 🔗 joepie91 but yeah, 4chan, thoughts?
17:13 🔗 ivan` in a talk SketchCow claimed to be backing up 4chan, wonder if that is still going on
17:14 🔗 joepie91 I think that'd be the roflcon talk I just watched
17:14 🔗 joepie91 I believe he said that he archived a few million threads
17:15 🔗 joepie91 but did not specifically mention that an ongoing effort existed
17:17 🔗 DFJustin chanarchive.org is getting the 'best of' on an ongoing basis
17:18 🔗 joepie91 ya, I know
17:18 🔗 joepie91 but I'm not a terrible fan of their grab strategy
17:18 🔗 joepie91 :P
17:18 🔗 joepie91 quick writeup: http://sprunge.us/HPEU
17:22 🔗 joepie91 http://falkvinge.net/2013/07/10/fan-subtitle-site-raided-by-copyright-industry-aided-by-police/
17:22 🔗 joepie91 sigh
17:25 🔗 balrog :[
17:25 🔗 balrog that's stupid, they're attacking their fans...
17:26 🔗 joepie91 haven't they basically been doing that for years npow
17:26 🔗 joepie91 now *
17:26 🔗 joepie91 and yes, it's incredibly stupid
17:26 🔗 balrog usually not that blatantly
17:26 🔗 joepie91 true
17:26 🔗 joepie91 anyway
17:26 🔗 joepie91 I'm more and more getting the feeling that the copyright industry (so to say) is more or less on their last legs
17:26 🔗 joepie91 (I probably botched a saying there)
17:27 🔗 joepie91 they seem to be pissing off more and more people
17:27 🔗 joepie91 and more and more alternatives are starting to surface
17:27 🔗 DFJustin nope, correct english idiom :)
17:29 🔗 joepie91 ah.
17:29 🔗 joepie91 I get confused wth Dutch idioms at times
17:29 🔗 joepie91 :)
17:35 🔗 ersi joepie91: Well, sponsors doesn't own anything at Hxx Stichtung events.. so
17:36 🔗 Schbirid dashboard porn http://www.mapbox.com/blog/dashboards-for-data/
17:36 🔗 ersi joepie91: It's a great event though :) should consider coming :)
17:37 🔗 ersi Also, regarding 'fan subtitle site raided': They copied original subtitles from DVD and published
17:37 🔗 ersi Most of them are community created, but someone uploaded about 100 original DVD subtitles (so I've heard)
17:38 🔗 joepie91 ersi: that's not a reason to raid a site
17:39 🔗 joepie91 also, re: event
17:39 🔗 Schbirid heh, reason
17:39 🔗 joepie91 probably won't have money for it
17:39 🔗 Schbirid just remember that oink was declared non guilty
17:46 🔗 DFJustin dunno about sweden but in most countries a translation is considered a derivative work and thus an exclusive privilege of the copyright holder
17:47 🔗 DFJustin but yeah raiding a site which can only make your movies more popular is pretty braindead
17:47 🔗 winr4r yes
17:47 🔗 winr4r on both counts
17:47 🔗 winr4r they can be legally in the right *and* fucking retarded
17:49 🔗 DFJustin well what it probably is is ass-dragging local middlemen wanting to preserve their status
17:50 🔗 DFJustin "you mean we can't release the movie 6 months after everywhere else for twice the price anymore??"
17:50 🔗 SketchCow I'm obviously going to Gitmo
17:52 🔗 yipdw that reminds me, I should alias git-merge-one-file to git-mo
17:58 🔗 joepie91 <winr4r>they can be legally in the right *and* fucking retarded
17:58 🔗 joepie91 this, basically
17:58 🔗 joepie91 I've long given up on judging things by legality
17:58 🔗 joepie91 the legal aspects just becomes so twisted over time as consecutive legislating parties lose track of the original purpose of a certain piece of legislation
17:59 🔗 joepie91 and just keep extending or changing it based on "what people think it's supposed to be"
17:59 🔗 joepie91 without any regard for why it existed in the first place
17:59 🔗 joepie91 it's nonsnse
17:59 🔗 joepie91 nonsense *
18:00 🔗 joepie91 I mean
18:00 🔗 joepie91 legal reasoning: technically subtitles are a derived work of the original dialogue which is technically copyrighted and part of the original work, therefore subtitles may be infringing
18:01 🔗 joepie91 moral reasoning, taking into account the original reason for copyright: dialogue was written and writer receives a monopoly on it for a while, ??????, fansubs are a bad thing
18:01 🔗 joepie91 I'd love to see someone fill in the question marks there without refering to legality anywhere in their text
18:02 🔗 joepie91 (and that's even completely omitting the part where human innovation is nearly always based on derivation in some form or shape, and how it's insane to block that out through the use of a monopoly and then bring up as an argument that it "promotes innovation")
18:03 🔗 winr4r joepie91: i don't agree
18:03 🔗 winr4r i'm not particularly pro- or anti-copyright, i find the arguments from the extremists on both sides to be entirely unconvincing
18:04 🔗 joepie91 don't agree with what?
18:05 🔗 winr4r joepie91: your implied argument that copyright does not promote innovation
18:05 🔗 joepie91 can you show otherwise?
18:06 🔗 winr4r joepie91: no, i can't, which is why i'm somewhat agnostic about it
18:06 🔗 winr4r i just don't find the arguments against particularly compelling
18:07 🔗 joepie91 so, if I provide a logical *and* an observationally supportable argument showing that copyright works against innovation, and there does not appear to be any evidence that shows it _promotes_ innovation, then why are you disagreeing with it?
18:07 🔗 joepie91 (the observationally supportable argument being any of the 2346134613462346 cases where someone couldn't make an improved version of something because of copyright - hell, look at these subs for an example)
18:08 🔗 joepie91 note that I'm shorthanding "technical innovation and the advancement of culture" here using the word "innovation"
18:08 🔗 winr4r joepie91: you're taking a case where copyright is actually retarded and probably needs reform, and applying it to copyright generally
18:09 🔗 winr4r invalid operation
18:09 🔗 joepie91 winr4r: there have been many of these cases in the past
18:09 🔗 joepie91 there have been none that I can recall where copyright was shown to have promoted innovation
18:09 🔗 joepie91 and with innovation I actually mean innovation and not "making something different that isn't necessarily better just to avoid copyright"
18:10 🔗 joepie91 I am not applying this case to copyright generally
18:10 🔗 joepie91 I am applying all the cases I've run across to copyright generally
18:10 🔗 joepie91 combined with the logical reasoning regarding innovation and derivation
18:10 🔗 joepie91 combined with the lack of evidence to the contrary
18:10 🔗 joepie91 I'd say that's a pretty solid argument, altogether
18:12 🔗 joepie91 I do also have to note that so far, I haven't spoken to a single person that was able to show a case where copyright clearly promoted innovation
18:13 🔗 joepie91 and I've asked quite a few people
18:13 🔗 DFJustin well there are many innovative creative works that would not have been produced if not for the expectation that they could be sold
18:13 🔗 DFJustin now I would argue that in a zero-copyright environment, crowdfunding could replace a lot of that
18:13 🔗 joepie91 the best anyone could come up with was "correlation" (ie. tech has advanced in the past X years, and that MUST be due to copyright) without any concrete evidence
18:13 🔗 DFJustin but that's not quite the same thing as saying it does nothing
18:13 🔗 joepie91 DFJustin: that's the thing
18:13 🔗 joepie91 how can you know what those works wouldn't have been produced if copyright didn't exist?
18:14 🔗 joepie91 also, copyright doesn't exist != things cannot be sold
18:14 🔗 joepie91 they're somewhat related concepts, but not the same thing
18:14 🔗 joepie91 er, s/what/that/
18:15 🔗 SketchCow Gitmooooooo
18:15 🔗 joepie91 (also, I should probably point out that copyright never had as its core intention to be a business model - that was just a tool to reach the goal of innovation, which seems to have failed miserably)
18:16 🔗 joepie91 (so any reasoning that anyone might have along the lines of "but if we abolish copyright, this and that industry will die!" is therefore invalid, as their existence is purely a result of their unintended use of a legal instrument)
18:17 🔗 DFJustin yeah I'm fully onboard with the idea that certain industries may only exist now for artificial reasons and in a post-copyright situation we would have to live with their reduction in size
18:18 🔗 DFJustin but I don't agree that they produce nothing of value, just that that value may be less than the costs of the social restrictions required
18:19 🔗 joepie91 DFJustin: if that should be interpreted as "it's not worth it", I agree on that
18:22 🔗 winr4r well, in the coming decades we're going to find out what unenforceable (sp) copyright looks like, which for practical purposes, is the same as no copyright
18:22 🔗 winr4r so we won't need to speculate!
18:22 🔗 DFJustin well I would argue that's already the status quo
18:22 🔗 DFJustin at least as far as noncommercial use goes
18:22 🔗 joepie91 I think unenforceable is actually the correct spelling
18:22 🔗 winr4r i don't think it's necessarily a good thing, but that's how it's going
18:22 🔗 joepie91 DFJustin: not quite yet
18:23 🔗 joepie91 derivatives are still hard
18:23 🔗 DFJustin yes that is the correct spelling
18:23 🔗 joepie91 currently copyright is unenforceable for direct usage of existing materials
18:23 🔗 joepie91 but that's really not the most interesting and/or innovative part
18:23 🔗 winr4r DFJustin: nah, you'll still get raided if you sell stuff made by other people, for example
18:23 🔗 joepie91 think fansubbing or fandubbing groups, they are still having issues distributing their derivatives
18:23 🔗 DFJustin sure I think you would get more good stuff like derivatives if it were legal
18:23 🔗 joepie91 as in, in video format and such
18:23 🔗 joepie91 despite their noncommercialness
18:23 🔗 DFJustin but i think we're seeing the full *negative* consequences now i.e. it won't get any worse
18:24 🔗 ersi joepie91: Well, I agree with you. But it wasn't completely unfounded, which I thought at first
18:24 🔗 joepie91 DFJustin: that, I can probably agree with
18:24 🔗 joepie91 ersi: re: which thing?
18:24 🔗 joepie91 the completely unfounded part
18:24 🔗 DFJustin there may be a little more copying in the future as old people who don't know how to copy things die off but they're not the market for most media anyway
18:26 🔗 ersi joepie91: raiding/serving the subtitle site
18:26 🔗 DFJustin I don't see selling stuff made by other people as having much room for growth, either people will want to pay the original creators or they will just download it for free
18:27 🔗 joepie91 ersi: hm, I'd still consider it unfounded... not sure what happened to "go to court first"
18:27 🔗 ersi DFJustin: Well, I guess they consider the subtitles to make the 'pirate version of the movie' more popular
18:27 🔗 DFJustin bootleg dvds and such fill a vacuum created by bad internet lines and difficult file sharing
18:27 🔗 ersi joepie91: So do I, read what I wrote. I said *completely* unfounded ;)
18:27 🔗 joepie91 DFJustin: I don't completely agree
18:27 🔗 DFJustin with a dash of fraud
18:27 🔗 joepie91 there's also a psychological factor
18:27 🔗 joepie91 especially in the past, when filesharing wasn't as pervasive as it is now
18:28 🔗 joepie91 I did notice that people who bought copies off friends, seemed to feel less guilty about it and less affected by guilt-creating propaganda
18:28 🔗 ersi I feel the availability of music and video has gone way down, maybe Spotify and the Video On Demand services do make a differance there
18:28 🔗 joepie91 than those that downloaded it
18:28 🔗 joepie91 because they still felt like they "paid their share" for it
18:28 🔗 joepie91 even if it didn't go to the creator
18:28 🔗 joepie91 now that filesharing is so pervasive and generally quite socially accepted... I don't think that really applies anymore
18:28 🔗 ersi Well, in Sweden, we pay for the privilige of making self-copies (I'm sure you guys do as well) with the blank-media "private tax"
18:28 🔗 joepie91 ersi: the legal availability seems to have gotten worse
18:29 🔗 joepie91 and yes, we have a similar system
18:29 🔗 joepie91 also, I should actually elaorate
18:29 🔗 joepie91 when I say "legal availability has gotten worse" I don't mean it has gotten less
18:29 🔗 joepie91 but it has gotten more restricted
18:29 🔗 joepie91 setups like radio-style music sites to avoid having to pay full licensing fees
18:29 🔗 ersi Nah, at least not here in Sweden - availability of legal shops where you can get music and movies and tv shows have gone up. Availability on the same thing in the piracy scene seems to be way lower though
18:29 🔗 joepie91 removing the ability to just search for and play a track
18:29 🔗 joepie91 DRM on music files
18:29 🔗 joepie91 and so on
18:30 🔗 ersi I don't consider DRM making it unavailable
18:30 🔗 ersi It's still available, but in a lesser free format
18:30 🔗 joepie91 hence 'worse' and not 'less'
18:30 🔗 joepie91 :P
18:30 🔗 DFJustin I have noticed a decline in "traditional" p2p networks but I assumed it was due to bittorrent and now file hosting sites being easier for most people
18:30 🔗 joepie91 it restricts your possible actions with it
18:30 🔗 DFJustin unfortunately this makes "back catalog" type stuff a lot harder to find
18:31 🔗 joepie91 ie. want to read your ebook on your device that doesn't read protected $format files? youre shit out of luck
18:31 🔗 joepie91 no way to legally convert it (in many jurisdictions)
18:31 🔗 joepie91 DFJustin: back catalog?
18:31 🔗 DFJustin older or less popular media
18:31 🔗 joepie91 ah
18:31 🔗 joepie91 well, what.cd does have a lot
18:31 🔗 joepie91 but meh
18:31 🔗 joepie91 closed
18:32 🔗 DFJustin you can always get the latest album off mediafire but in 3 years it will be dmca'd and maybe nobody cares anymore to reupload it
18:32 🔗 DFJustin whereas on emule it would still be there
18:32 🔗 joepie91 it seems that long-term availability has moved to closed platforms
18:32 🔗 joepie91 private trackers, restricted sneakernets, etc
18:32 🔗 joepie91 perhaps sneakernet is not the right term
18:32 🔗 joepie91 :P
18:32 🔗 joepie91 but I hope you get what I mean
18:33 🔗 DFJustin since people don't need emule for the new stuff, they're not leaving it running and thus their collections have gone dark
18:33 🔗 DFJustin and yeah private sites help with that although there can still be seeding issues with old content
18:34 🔗 SketchCow I'm getting it all
18:34 🔗 SketchCow <3
18:35 🔗 ersi joepie91: closed? what.cd? what are you on about :o
18:35 🔗 SketchCow As opposed to open access.
18:35 🔗 ersi aha
18:39 🔗 joepie91 as SketchCow said
19:55 🔗 underscor tbh, it's *generally* gotten easier to just pay for your media
19:56 🔗 underscor with spotify and netflix, as long as you don't care about the fact that you're just licensing it, and not buying
19:56 🔗 underscor you can get bascially all the music and movies/tv you could ever need for under $30 a month
19:57 🔗 balrog yes, but access is at the whim of the gatekeepers
19:57 🔗 balrog if they want to take it off spotify or netflix, they can do that overnight
19:58 🔗 underscor right, true
19:58 🔗 underscor but that's part of the premium you pay for the price cut
19:59 🔗 underscor I do certainly wish there was a service like netflix that just gave you sweet-ass 1080p MKVs
20:01 🔗 joepie91 underscor: TPB + flex!
20:01 🔗 underscor I mean a service that I could pay for :P
20:02 🔗 joepie91 er, sorry, plex
20:02 🔗 joepie91 derp
20:02 🔗 joepie91 not flex
20:02 🔗 underscor and actually recompense rights holders
20:02 🔗 ersi Yeah, like bandcamp for video
20:02 🔗 underscor hell yes
20:02 🔗 joepie91 underscor: I see your point
20:02 🔗 ersi I'd jizz all over that
20:02 🔗 underscor I feel like that should already be a thing
20:02 🔗 underscor Why is it not a thing
20:02 🔗 * underscor ycombinators
20:02 🔗 * joepie91 doesn't like the term "rights holders" though
20:03 🔗 ersi because the video we want, is held by huge rights holders
20:03 🔗 joepie91 underscor: those artists that are interested and able to do so, already do so
20:03 🔗 joepie91 through various means
20:03 🔗 ersi that have their own thoughts about those artifacts
20:03 🔗 joepie91 those that aren't, aren't, and want to hold on to prehistoric and restrictive models
20:03 🔗 ersi artists don't do videos
20:03 🔗 joepie91 the combination of the two is what you see now
20:03 🔗 joepie91 ersi: there -are- bandcamp-like platforms
20:03 🔗 joepie91 for video
20:03 🔗 joepie91 hell, that's how that minecraft docu was distributed
20:04 🔗 joepie91 "ah, I see you paid, here you go, a 1080p mkv"
20:04 🔗 ersi Name one instead of saying it exists
20:04 🔗 joepie91 give me a sec to load my email
20:04 🔗 joepie91 actually
20:04 🔗 joepie91 website is faster
20:04 🔗 ersi hmm
20:05 🔗 joepie91 http://vhx.tv/
20:05 🔗 joepie91 is the one the minecraft docu is using now
20:05 🔗 joepie91 it seems
20:05 🔗 joepie91 there was another one they used before
20:05 🔗 ersi But if you don't care about the availability of the things you want to watch and aren't annoyed by either DRM or that you don't own what you watch - Netflix and the other On Demand services are really hitting home
20:05 🔗 ersi Well, not as greatly in the FOSS-nerds-that-debate things arena
20:06 🔗 ersi but for common folks and common tech folks
20:06 🔗 joepie91 http://redux.com/ is what they used before
20:06 🔗 joepie91 @ ersi
20:06 🔗 ersi ah, alright - havn't heard about them before
20:07 🔗 winr4r joepie91: i'm big on the "give people money and get a huge fucking MPEG in return" model
20:11 🔗 joepie91 oh look, someone trying to hijack my blog through a password reset again
20:12 🔗 joepie91 really not quite sure why people try that
20:23 🔗 Schbirid too much text and emotitional statements for me to read but http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/cloud-guys/plug-the-brain-of-your-devices
20:25 🔗 joepie91 They have one content,
20:25 🔗 joepie91 what?
21:49 🔗 godane g4tv.com-video2152: Steve Jobs Keynote Macworld Tokyo Part 1: https://archive.org/details/g4tv.com-video2152
22:14 🔗 godane wow
22:15 🔗 godane looks like google has instead access to archive.org
22:15 🔗 godane in that once its in archive.org
22:16 🔗 godane google can find it
22:21 🔗 godane uploaded: https://archive.org/details/cdrom-linuxformatmagazine-94

irclogger-viewer