[00:27] SketchCow: facebook is deleting stuff now: http://www.buzzfeed.com/charliewarzel/facebook-says-its-going-to-purge-low-quality-content-and-mem [00:28] not that they could have been delete stuff for a while [04:12] not that we can save it [04:18] I wrote a bot which automatically exports events when the bot is invited to them [04:18] but, it's pretty solidly against facebook's Ts and Cs I'm sure [04:36] nice [04:39] because we have a social club which has mostly drifted over to facebook (it used to exist on a mailing list) [04:39] but for the sensible folk who stayed on the mailing list it lets them still be invited to things [05:01] http://www.wired.com/business/2013/06/amazon-groceries/ <-- old, but I still wonder what's wrong with "hey, go to the fucking market" [05:02] guess I'm a luddite [05:02] but that takes time and getting off your fucking ass [05:02] and getting off the computer [05:03] the first Amazon Fresh driver to troll their customers is my hero [07:09] yipdw: For what I've understood, it's.. easier to co-ordinate the "life puzzle" with such services.. Or atleast that's what Swedes say who use similar services [07:10] though here, you usually get a premade bag with recepies and shizzle [07:24] ersi: hmm [07:25] ersi: I can see how it'd improve organization; I guess there's something really creepy about Amazon serving everything to me though [09:19] Yeah, we don't have Amazon over here ;p [09:19] But yeah, I feel creeped out when there's too much reliance on a single actor as well [13:14] shouldn't this item go into archiveteam collection: https://archive.org/details/archiveteam_archivebot_go_005 [14:03] ey [14:03] http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/ [14:03] shall I start archiving this one? [14:04] it is a very big site, but the IA is not allowed according to the robots.txt... [15:07] do it if you want to [15:07] no need to ask for permissions to do things ;) [16:00] weird. that robots.txt file has a comment saying it was intended for a different site. [16:07] yeah [16:07] whatever lol [16:07] gone = gone [16:07] so it needs to be archived [16:07] :P [16:51] does someone have a good recommendation for GUI-based (~ncurses would be alright too) tool for syncing directories? unison does not transmit timestamps and i find that out after years... [16:53] http://freefilesync.sourceforge.net/ [16:54] is what I'm using these days, note the windows installer wants to install various adware things if you don't watch your checkboxes (why are even OSS programs doing this now...) [16:54] actual recommendation? [16:54] nice [16:54] thanks [16:54] OSS != non-evil :( [16:57] hm, it does not sync over ssh does it? i kinda want that :) [17:16] if you mount it to your filesystem it does [17:17] Schbirid, do you have windows? [17:19] linux [17:20] DFJustin: because SF is pushing projects to do it [17:27] Schbirid: Can't help you then... :( [17:27] I would suggest robocopy of you had windows [17:27] Hope you find a solution! [17:27] :) [17:30] rsync? :P [17:31] oh wait, gui [17:34] it has to be interactive on conflicts [17:35] ffs seems nice so far [17:35] weird gui though [17:36] timestamp is intact (used via sshfs) [17:38] hm,i have to decide between "timestamp and size" and "contents" for the comparison :( i want both [17:51] you are going to want something that has a server component (like rsync or unison) if you want contents checking. otherwise you will be pulling down full copies of the remote files in order to compare. [19:45] very nsfw, but probably needs archiving: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=334_1385864004 [21:19] so i'm back up [21:19] looks like r2.co.nz may need a backup [21:19] it has tons of tech vdeos from stuff like webstock [21:20] my problem is that the download speed isn't going past 40kbytes [21:21] i will see what i can do about webstock [21:21] have an example link? I can try my speed...see if it's the same.. [21:21] but everything else maybe on you guys [21:22] http://www.r2.co.nz/20060525/ [21:22] that one i'm trying to download [21:24] try one of the videos there [21:25] godane: well damn... tried the opening vid. from home 20 KB/s, from a server in .de.. 25 KB/s .. [21:26] oh right.. NZ... 300 ms ping [21:26] so i'm going to do multiable downloads [21:27] 350 ms ping the 20 KB/s one, 300 ms the 25 KB/s one [21:27] so kinda directly related to ping.. [21:28] whats funny was i went to the site cause IA wayback was slow downloading :P [21:29] that was about 10kbytes better then this [21:30] also by the way the site is setup it looked like squarter site [21:33] ok now getting alot faster speed thur wayback [21:40] fyi... tried same file from an amazon instance in Sydney... 207 KB/s [21:45] http://i.imgur.com/9LYeblP.gif [21:58] godane: shall I start downloading the website tomorrow? [21:59] it will take forever [21:59] doesn't matter [21:59] :) [21:59] I just do it [21:59] for as long as it needs to go [21:59] ok? [21:59] but you could do is download the html and images and stuff [22:00] that way we can make a list of files on the site [22:00] hmm I'll see [22:00] but I'm going to sleep now [22:00] we'll talk about it tomorrow [22:01] then I'll start the download [22:03] i did found out that wayback doesn't like to resume downloads [22:05] anyone know something 'better' than TIFF Group 4 for b/w scan images? Trying to convert to PNG seems to be twice the size of the TIFF files. [22:05] starting to wish TIFFs were supported in browsers.. [22:05] b/w as in two-tone, or b/w as in greyscale? [22:06] 1 bit per pixel [22:06] two-tone, ok [22:07] I don't know of anything that browsers support that would be better than png ... [22:07] deathy: tiff group 4 or jbig2 [22:08] make sure you use lossless jbig2 if you use it [22:08] balrog: originals are TIFF "Group 4 Fax Encoding" [22:08] and you want it smaller? [22:08] things like: original TIFF: 2.5 KB, PNG: 5.5 KB [22:09] is pdf acceptable? [22:09] and I have 340 GB of TIFFs [22:09] urm..not really [22:09] group 4 tiff can easily be wrapped into pdfs [22:10] was just thinking of trying out a more 'web-compatible' format, so no need for runtime conversions, but keeping minimal size [22:10] there isn't any :/ [22:11] was actually surprised at how good the TIFF Group 4 encoding is... [22:12] jbig2 is much better [22:12] nowhere near as compatible though [22:13] jbig2 also leads to stupid errors if you aren't careful :-\ [22:13] oh...I remember now.. "In 2013, various substitutions (including replacing “6” with “8”) were reported to happen on some Xerox Workcentre photocopier and printer machines" [22:14] Coderjoe: yeah [22:14] that's in lossy mode [22:27] i said "if you're not careful". using lossless mode would count as careful