[00:38] underscor: you're interning at archive.org? awesome! [00:39] Yep :D [00:39] * underscor is so excited [00:44] are you going to sf for that? [01:49] chronomex: yeah, 2 weeks starting monday [01:49] (in like 3 days) [02:10] congrats underscor [02:13] thabkd [02:13] er, thanks [02:14] so will you be working on the same team/department as SketchCow ? [11:43] wow. crazy [11:44] this 3.5 inch drive has no high density detect switch [11:45] though i suppose since the difference between hd and dd is sectors per track, it isn't needed if your controller is smart enough [11:50] haha [11:50] 5V DC 1.44A [11:56] hmm [11:57] this other drive with less smarts seems to have done a better job of reading this troublesome disk [12:05] i should probably take it in to the office and check the track alignment [12:14] Coderjoe: does it use half as much current if you insert a double-density disk? [12:50] underscor: thanks for your wget-warc bug report, but I think it's not a warc-specific problem (see https://github.com/alard/wget-warc/issues/13) [12:50] db48x2: re extra metadata for wget-warc: see https://github.com/alard/wget-warc/issues/14 [13:36] alard: yeah, regular wget uses lots of memory on big hierachies too [15:46] can somebody ban this user JackSavage ? He is spamming http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges [17:11] what just happened? [17:11] 04:44:11 Coderjoe this 3.5 inch drive has no high density detect switch [17:11] Coderjoe: I have a 2.88M drive somewhere if you find such a diskette [17:50] chronomex: I have another drive that has two switches on each side, but is not an ED drive. just part count reduction. the second switch isn't connected to anything. [23:28] hmmm interesting [23:55] lemonkey: what is going on?