[00:00] SDL.h is 'usuable' according to the script, but not 'present'. strange, all the other SDL options pass. but you have to remember this is all native until the make process starts. [00:00] usable rather [00:04] oh, yeah for sdl you want to use emscripten's, definitely [00:04] https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/tree/master/system/include/SDL [00:05] ah look at that. [00:05] i can use -s USE_SDL=1 right? [00:06] is USE_SDL just a macro like CC? [00:06] because I have export=USE_SDL=1 but it doesn't change anything. [00:08] it says: You will need to modify the build system to look for files in emscripten/system or emscripten/system/bin in order to use the Emscripten sdl-config. [00:21] okay so there is a system/bin/sdl-config to replace the native one. break. [00:27] sorry, yeah I think you want -s USE_SDL=1 to be included as both CFLAGS and LDFLAGS [00:28] ah ok! [00:28] that'll tell emcc to set up the paths automatically, I believe [00:31] hm, configure is breaking on the -s [00:53] well, it is infact pointing to emscripten's include. but there is no SDL_keysym.h. it is safe to symlink them over? [00:54] this is all new to me. but I am learning. [00:55] got past that one. i should carry this into a script. [00:55] I want to say that SDL_keysym.h is from SDL2 and SDL1.x just defined the SDL_keysym struct in SDL_keyboard.h [00:55] ok [00:55] argh. [00:56] what to do what to do. keysym gives errors so that was not a good idea. [00:56] redefinitions. [00:56] indeed. [00:58] okay, so vice_sdl.h is looking for SDL/SDL_keysym.h. i had thought this was a 1.2 sdl project. [01:00] i mean I could whip up an sdl 2.0. but I have to know. [01:02] aparently SDL_keysym is in SDL-1.2.15. [01:04] hm nativethe one installed and the desired version are no different. why on Earth isn't there one in emscripten? [01:18] aiui SDL 1.3 is the development branch that became 2.0, so 1.2 and 1.3 are not compatible [01:20] oh I see [01:23] wow, got much frather. [01:23] farther [01:24] used this: https://pastebin.com/4uFmF0wi [01:24] DFJustin: thanks [01:27] hm, a memcpy without a that is easy enough. [01:28] much much farther. [01:28] woohoo! [01:36] success. [01:36] got it to build? [01:36] not to go through the last sequence in accordance with vice.js [01:37] yes. to LLVM bitcode. including a non runnable executable. :) [01:37] thats *okay* though. [01:37] hey, it's something :D [01:40] Thank you for the support bai! [01:40] time to rsync! [01:46] glad I could help, cool to see that project coming together [01:47] yes. I"m thinking if it's easy enough to release a 1.2 version just to see if people want it but I definitely want to convert vice 3.1 over the sdl 2.0. [02:23] I'm back [02:24] And in CA this weekend! [02:24] gah, I'm gonna be out of town this weekend, going camping with the wife up in Leggett [02:45] SketchCow: try Old Town in San Diego if you get a chance. The food there is amazing. [02:45] ANd the gas lamp district is nice too. But Cali is one big place...so. [02:59] hm, symbol multiply defined again. i had thought this would go away. [03:00] here is my link process: [03:00] https://pastebin.com/DxBNZMEA [03:04] hm, some old cache. but a new multiply defined symbol. let's see. [03:06] hm, this looks like an actual instance. GREAT! [03:13] okay, progress. now is the funny one. 'main'. [03:17] i think i'm just going to read for the remainder of the day. Linux Kernels is a great book. At least I have a clear path to follow however short or long it may be! [03:46] adieu. [03:46] *** JohnTalen has quit IRC (Quit: leaving)