[00:06] *** JAA has joined #warrior [00:07] *** bakJAA sets mode: +o JAA [00:10] *** arkiver has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [00:10] *** ivan has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [00:10] *** balrog has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [00:10] *** kiska1 has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [00:11] *** logchfoo2 starts logging #warrior at Sun Mar 31 00:11:27 2019 [00:11] *** logchfoo2 has joined #warrior [00:11] *** sep332 has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [00:11] *** TigerbotH has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [00:11] *** jrayhawk has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [00:12] *** joepie91 has joined #warrior [00:13] *** rnduser_ has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [00:16] *** arkiver has joined #warrior [00:31] *** TigerbotH has joined #warrior [00:33] *** jrayhawk has joined #warrior [01:09] *** step has joined #warrior [01:09] *** kiska1 has joined #warrior [01:11] *** sep332 has joined #warrior [01:25] *** robbierut has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [02:03] *** balrog has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [02:07] *** balrog has joined #warrior [02:46] *** rnduser_ has joined #warrior [02:50] *** rnduser has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [03:02] *** robbierut has joined #warrior [03:48] *** robbierut has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [03:56] *** robbierut has joined #warrior [03:57] *** mtntmnky has quit IRC (Write error: Broken pipe) [03:57] *** balrog has quit IRC (Write error: Broken pipe) [03:57] *** kiska1 has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [03:57] *** jrayhawk has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [03:57] *** balrog has joined #warrior [03:58] *** TigerbotH has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [03:58] *** sep332 has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [03:59] *** kiska1 has joined #warrior [03:59] *** tmg1|eva_ has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [03:59] *** tmg1|eva has joined #warrior [04:02] *** TigerbotH has joined #warrior [04:02] *** mtntmnky has joined #warrior [04:03] *** sep332 has joined #warrior [04:04] *** jrayhawk has joined #warrior [05:24] *** robbierut has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [05:54] *** robbierut has joined #warrior [06:53] *** d5f4a3622 has quit IRC (Quit: WeeChat 2.4) [06:58] *** d5f4a3622 has joined #warrior [07:22] *** rnduser__ has joined #warrior [07:23] *** Somebody2 has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [07:24] *** Somebody2 has joined #warrior [07:26] *** rnduser_ has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [07:31] *** Smiley has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [07:31] *** Smiley has joined #warrior [07:36] *** VADemon has joined #warrior [07:46] *** clayray_ has joined #warrior [07:54] *** Somebody2 has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 360 seconds) [07:55] *** Somebody2 has joined #warrior [07:56] *** clayray has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [07:56] *** clayray has joined #warrior [08:00] *** clayray_ has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [08:06] *** robbierut has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 1212 seconds) [08:06] *** robbierut has joined #warrior [11:28] Thinking from the google+ project... [11:28] Given there were lots of people who volunteered space for rsync targets but they weren't able to help [11:28] but since a lot of the machines people are using have a lot of space [11:29] Could you set a far higher limit on how many threads a warrior can run, but then add a 'maximum concurrent downloads' limit, like the rsync limit? [11:30] e.g. on my server I have 1TB of free space on the drive that's running the warriors. Could I set, say, 100 to run at once, maximum of 6 concurrent downloads, 6 concurrent rsyncs, and therefore as soon as a thread finishes downloading, another will start to download (keeping the transfers from google going!) but then I'll end up with a lot more local disk usage and a lot more threads queuing for the [11:30] rsync targets [11:34] I think Kaz has a very clear opinion on this. [11:48] Ha, based on that reply I'm guessing the opinion is "nope, no chance"? [11:49] *** robbierut has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [11:49] *** robbierut has joined #warrior [15:31] *** marked has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [15:32] *** marked has joined #warrior [16:49] *** HunterZ has joined #warrior [17:37] blueacid: I think it would be more appropriate to have a special option in the scripts rather than the Warrior, since the Warrior is only allocated a specified amount of disk space from VirtualBox/VMware. [17:37] robbierut: What was Kaz's opinion? [17:38] I mean, reasoning. [17:38] *** rnduser has joined #warrior [17:38] we don't want caching on the warriors [17:41] Yes. And what about the scripts that do not use the Warriors? [17:42] *** rnduser__ has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [18:09] same thing applies [19:13] *** figpucker has joined #warrior [19:41] *** figpucker has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) [19:43] *** figpucker has joined #warrior [21:08] *** betamax has joined #warrior [21:11] quick question: once the warrior has uploaded an item it grabbed to the staging server, does it delete that item from it's VDI (talking VirtualBox one here)? [21:11] cause I don't have much disk space left, and the warrior VDI is growing steadily bigger when on G+ [21:12] started at 1.1G, after a few hours now at 6GB [21:12] betamax: Yes it does [21:13] You might have a job which is large, and therefore will download a lot before it completes, archives and uploads [21:13] most jobs are only around 45MB compressed (so maybe 100-200MB of downloaded data before getting compressed) [21:14] But some are as big as 1-2GB. Think the record sized one is said to be 50GB [21:15] ah, OK. (And wow, 50GB? I'm assuming that's from videos?) [21:16] Possibly! I just had a flick through my warriors, one is currently uploading a 2GB compressed archive, so presumably 3/4GB of downloaded data for that [21:17] I believe VirtualBox won't shrink the disk image back down when the (virtual) space becomes unused though, and you have to compact it manually. [21:18] Thats true [21:44] JAA: You're right [21:44] It will grow automatically up to the limit [21:44] and then stays there, which is a pain [21:49] Yeah, there are limitations to this VM setup. If you can, use the Docker container instead (which I think shouldn't have that issue although I'm not familiar with Docker) or run the scripts directly. That should also give better performance/less waste since it avoids the virtualisation layer. [21:51] betamax: the v3 appliance just grows to 60gb unlike the old one that only grew as _really_ required. Must be some fs anti-fragmentation mechanism. So you really should expect it to become 60gb soon [21:52] I think the v3 VM runs the Docker container inside a minimal Alpine VM, right? Maybe that has something to do with it. [21:52] I run the scripts manually from inside the VM... :] [21:53] lol, ok, sure, why not. [22:08] VADemon: good to know (tried using VBox's compress utility, but as I expected that didn't work) [22:08] I guess once it gets too big I'll shut it down (safely, of course) and spin up a new image [22:10] *** figpucker has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving) [22:28] *** xsfx has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) [22:39] *** xsfx has joined #warrior [22:46] *** HunterZ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [23:12] *** blueacid has quit IRC (Quit: leaving) [23:28] feature request, check ban list when giving out rsync slots [23:32] What ban list? [23:33] the usernames that are banned, perhaps shouldn't be allowed rsync assignments. though this could be in the code base already, didn't have time to check. too much going on, just didn't want to forget about it. [23:41] No, not in there as far as I can see. [23:50] *** thelounge has joined #warrior [23:50] *** thelounge is now known as Evie [23:51] * Evie makes a note not to ask about upload issues [23:52] However, anyone seeing rate-limit redirects with googleplus ? [23:54] ahh. well then. https://twitter.com/textfiles/status/1112494767601053696 [23:58] the common report is 503's. if it's not a 503, perhaps report that [23:58] Rate-limit redirection encountered, sleeping ... [23:58] 22=302 https://plus.google.com/102542898851051868654 [23:58] I'm seeing 302's across two different endpoints [23:59] join #googleminus and #googleminus-ot [23:59] Danke