[00:25] if you like the power efficiency of ARM devices, but would like to step up to something with more power, the first ARM servers are rolling out: http://www.boston.co.uk/solutions/viridis/default.aspx (article here: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/07/09/boston_viridis_arm_server/) [00:26] if you go by the pricing in the register article, a little pricey for the average man right now, but hopefully with more vendors, we'll get better pricing soon [01:34] wasn't some project already giving out free VMs on ARM servers [01:35] ah there [01:35] http://calxeda.us5.list-manage2.com/subscribe?u=b75fa1e18ed23997b18da37b0&id=9d06104a18 [01:40] @ dashcloud [01:49] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcLNteez3c4 [01:49] Constantly blasting in the archive team hq [01:51] in other words, your intermodal container [02:04] thanks joepie91 [02:04] np [02:04] they work pretty well btw :P [02:05] so you've used them for archiveteam stuff or for other things? [02:06] nah, just some random playing around [13:51] SketchCow: did you receive those Amiga disks yet? [15:53] Protip: Use a bit.ly url as the canonical link to your source tarball http://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/ [15:55] gross [15:56] that is evil [15:56] Yeah. [15:57] They also take down the old tarballs every time they release a new version. :( [15:57] urgh [15:57] attache.apple.com? [15:57] whyyy [15:57] .... [15:57] don't tell me this is hosted on something like mobileme [15:58] underscor: Looks to me to be some Apple developer thing. [15:59] oic [16:00] lol I tried to use bitly as a wrapper for my download link to aranjepack [16:00] they flagged it as spam because I'm linking directly to an exe [16:00] :D [16:02] oh, have real hosting for it now [16:03] gbit line, get real speeds :D [16:12] Aranje, mistym, thoughts on this design for a 'submit your news and press releases' site? http://cryto.net/projects/anonnews/ [16:13] Well, depending on what exactly you're going for, I'd make the boxes just a little bigger. I'd figure anything sorta journalistic would want the first paragraph (silly hook) to be fully displayed. [16:13] nah, it's really just a teaser [16:13] an index page [16:14] mmk [16:14] I should probably give a bit more context [16:14] otherwise it looks good [16:14] anonnews is currently suffering from information overload [16:14] though, do style the footer somehow [16:14] even if it's just a

[16:14] there are so many PRs and ops and articles that from the title alone you can't determine whether something is interesting or not [16:14] yeah. [16:14] so the idea is to display the first two sentences or so, or an image [16:14] to grab peoples attention towards things they find interesting [16:14] and the footer was styled, but that was a bit lost when I changed the color scheme lol [16:14] haha [16:15] it has a subtly different color now, but needs changing :P [16:15] I also still need to add a drop shadow for the line between header and content [16:15] in some way [16:15] give the author (poster) the choice, image in the background or small paragraph of X character length, after title? [16:15] (for the box display) [16:15] actually, it picks an image if it's available [16:15] and the text otherwise [16:15] * Aranje nods [16:16] because the text is usually just a textual representation of the image or video [16:20] is the chosing of articles for the front page going to be based purely on recency? [16:20] recency and popularity [16:20] one row for each [16:20] mmk [16:20] the last two rows are external and related sites [16:21] * Aranje nods [16:21] hmm [16:21] Aranje, force refresh http://cryto.net/projects/anonnews/ [16:21] added drop shadow for the content area line [16:21] :P [16:22] mm [16:22] it's a bit hacky but ok [16:22] I want to say "put 4 in a row" for the top two [16:22] instead of 3 [16:22] it can't get wider than this [16:22] don't decrease the size though [16:22] oh? [16:22] ;) [16:22] assuming shitty screen res? [16:22] not everyone has 1920x1080 [16:22] I'm using 900px as base [16:23] * Aranje nods [16:23] works well for laptops etc as well [16:23] 960grid heh [16:23] well yes, but modified [16:23] 960 is good for text [16:23] 900 is better for tiles [16:23] due to it looking more 'filled' [16:23] * Aranje nods [16:23] tiles with 960 looks too bloated [16:23] anyway, does the drop shadow work correctly for you? [16:23] because it was quite tricky to do in HTML+CSS :P [16:23] I get a fat line around them [16:24] screenshot? [16:24] well if you use the css3 drop shadow thing, should be easy [16:24] well, no, it isn't [16:24] really? [16:24] the shadows can't overlay either the content area or the buttons [16:24] so you have to add dummy divs to create the shadows on different z-indexes [16:24] and an overlay div to cut off the shadow on the content area [16:24] :P [16:25] it's basically an optical illusion in HTML/CSS [16:25] it LOOKS like the whole content area is gray, but it isn't [16:25] I um [16:25] there's actually a 2px and a 5px height div stacked on top of each other just under the buttons [16:25] :P [16:25] respectively creating and cutting off shadows [16:25] article.text { drop-shadow here } [16:25] look at the DOM inspector :) [16:26] that would overlay the buttons [16:26] oh, you mean the tiles? [16:26] I mean the header [16:26] yes [16:26] OH [16:26] motherfucker [16:26] the tiles have no shadow [16:26] Aranje: open the DOM inspector and remove the shadow-cutter and shadow-adder respectively [16:26] and see what happens [16:27] .page-header nav a {} [16:27] that's what is doing it [16:27] yes [16:28] but as I said [16:28] remove the shadow-cutter and shadow-adder [16:28] from the DOM [16:28] and see what happens [16:28] where is dom [16:28] and you'll understand why those dummy divs are there [16:28] ... [16:28] what browser? [16:28] chrome [16:28] right click just under the buttons [16:28] inspect element [16:28] yep [16:28] you'll see shadow-cutter and shadow-adder in the DOM tree [16:28] remove each of them [16:28] there already, looking at elements tab [16:28] and watch the difference [16:29] what tab should I be looking at [16:29] Elements... [16:29] ... [16:29] OH [16:29] ... [16:29] they're below [16:29] yes... [16:29] dude my screen isn't that tall [16:29] I can't see those at the same time as the menu code [16:29] haha [16:29] wat [16:29] right click just under the buttons [16:29] if you right click UNDER the buttons [16:29] >.> [16:29] you won't get the whole page header code [16:29] boring people right click where they're supposed to [16:30] lol [16:30] anyway, you found it? [16:30] oh, I see what you did [16:30] :) [16:32] hmm [16:33] I should bump my retroshare guide [16:33] haha [16:33] in the anonnews forum [16:33] biggest shitstorm ever [16:33] lol [16:34] sigh [16:34] I need to reinstall retroshare [16:34] and get back into that [16:34] retroshare is p aweomse [16:34] awesome* [16:35] I hated it [16:35] neat idea, shit devs [16:35] needs python implementation [16:36] in library formn [16:36] form * [16:36] they're all about forums and stuff, which is cool. But I basically got "fuck you, we don't care" in regards to the programs inability to handle more than a few thousand files. [16:37] what they said was more on the lines of "we're not targetting users with more than 1k files" [16:37] my response was "well then you're not a file sharing client, are you?" [16:38] lol 1000 [16:38] yeah. [16:38] I'd be fine if they said "not targetting users with >100k files". [16:39] that actually seems reasonable. [16:39] not ideal for me of course, but tooootally understandable. [16:40] was just reading this, the average collection of music files alone is 1,444 http://piracy.americanassembly.org/where-do-music-collections-come-from/ [16:41] yeah. [16:41] Mine is around 10k, just for music [16:41] let alone anything else I may wish to share [16:42] I had to set their rescan setting to once per day because it locked up my computer to do it [16:45] :p [16:45] Aranje: write a python lib! [16:46] I don't want to code [16:46] so many people tell me to code things, and I don't want to [16:48] lol [16:48] For the record my massive collection of Amiga Disks arrived. [16:57] and... google released their earnings report in midday trading [16:57] down 9% already [16:59] hahahahahaha they froze trading of google shares [16:59] to stop the dropping [16:59] what happened [17:00] they missed their targets [17:00] by 500 million dollars [17:00] and released in the middle of trading day, which you're not supposed to do apparently [17:00] and I can see why [17:01] It's a big complex miss, but still [17:01] http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1288776/000119312512426975/0001193125-12-426975-index.htm [17:01] http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-10-18/google-reports-early-huge-miss-sends-stock-plunging [17:02] heh [17:02] the first is their sec filing [17:04] humbum [17:04] exciting morning :D [17:04] aww, trade halted [17:04] I wanted to buy some too [17:05] haha yeah [17:05] wait till it hits bottom, buy a couple shares [17:05] there's your official article with numbers: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/google-profit-falls-misses-estimates-2012-10-18 [17:07] Updating FOS to the new ubuntu [17:07] What could possibly go wrong [17:07] uhoh [17:07] everything [17:07] I don't know... everything? [17:07] wwait [17:07] lol :P [17:07] is it ubuntu server? [17:08] cause their server distro isn't half bad [17:08] Upgrading [17:08] apport: unrecognized service [17:08] Exception during pm.DoInstall(): E:Couldn't configure pre-depend libc6 for libnih1, probably a dependency cycle. [17:08] Fetched 0 B in 0s (0 B/s) [17:08] ahah [17:08] I um [17:08] yeah, wait a week [17:08] lol [17:08] hahaha [17:09] that's what I do with ubuntu [17:09] which is actually much better than windows, which is wait an entire service pack [17:09] lmfao [17:09] sigh [17:09] I much prefer debian for servers [17:09] Aranje: lol [17:10] 1 week or 9 months and a service pack? I think the choice is pretty clear [17:10] and, indeed [17:10] yeah [17:10] I prefer freebsd over everything else for servers, but debian is a very solid second in my list [17:10] The FOS machine was upgraded from 2gb to 8gb of RAM. [17:10] YEAH :D [17:10] This should help with a bunch of these high-end insane grabs I'm doing. [17:11] sexy [17:12] btw, SketchCow: http://aarnist.cryto.net:81/at-arraydesign.warc.gz http://aarnist.cryto.net:81/at-designinganalogchips.warc.gz http://aarnist.cryto.net:81/at-historyofelectronics.warc.gz [17:12] grabs of three sites from a guy that died recently [17:12] Hans Camezind died earlier this year :( [17:12] including some dirs that aren't linked from the main site (with the old site etc) [17:12] for historyofelectronics, at least [17:13] ugh too many tabs [17:13] * Aranje goes on a shooting spree [17:24] yay :D https://twitter.com/Aranjedeath/status/258981662103318528 [19:06] Aww thats cute.