#archiveteam-bs 2013-04-29,Mon

↑back Search

Time Nickname Message
00:48 πŸ”— joepie91 holy crap, why does Steam need 750MB of RAM
01:18 πŸ”— Aranje have you never used steam on windows?
01:18 πŸ”— Aranje that's pretty decent ram usage
01:25 πŸ”— BlueMax Steam's using 60MB of RAM for me
01:26 πŸ”— joepie91 Aranje: I have not, no
01:27 πŸ”— joepie91 and after a restart it magically went down to like 140MB
01:27 πŸ”— joepie91 this is ridiculous
01:27 πŸ”— joepie91 it uses even more than Desura... I did not think that was possible..
01:27 πŸ”— Aranje It's been lighter and more stable since they deployed it on linux (on windows, too) :P
01:28 πŸ”— Aranje It used to be the biggest piece of shit... but mostly just the most tolerable piece of shit
01:28 πŸ”— joepie91 wasn't there a similar thing with the games, heh
01:28 πŸ”— joepie91 "oh, huh, switching to opengl made our games run faster on Windows as well, hm"
01:28 πŸ”— Aranje Yeah I always wonder what that is
01:28 πŸ”— joepie91 "we did noooot expect that"
01:28 πŸ”— Aranje simpler API's maybe
01:28 πŸ”— Aranje and then you can retool everything to use less calls etc
01:29 πŸ”— joepie91 Aranje: mostly, DirectX is probably just an inefficient piece of shit
01:29 πŸ”— Aranje hey look, we stopped leaking ram and calling the same render 7 times
01:29 πŸ”— joepie91 would fit the general trend of Microsoft stuff
01:29 πŸ”— joepie91 so even with practically 0 knowledge of DirectX, I feel fairly safe stating that
01:29 πŸ”— Aranje I'd imagine with the breadth of the games industry somebody would work with MS to make it suck less
01:29 πŸ”— Aranje but that isn't always true
01:30 πŸ”— Aranje :/
01:30 πŸ”— Aranje I mean shit, if I were EA I'd be doing exactly that
01:30 πŸ”— joepie91 wishful thinking, wishful thinking..
01:30 πŸ”— joepie91 and lol, EA
01:30 πŸ”— Aranje sure, but they're the big name
01:30 πŸ”— joepie91 they only seem interested in finding more ways to annoy paying customers
01:30 πŸ”— Aranje well yeah there's a few things I'd change if I was running EA :P
01:31 πŸ”— joepie91 heh, just a few?
01:31 πŸ”— joepie91 man
01:32 πŸ”— joepie91 I'm currently reading through the python gtk docs
01:32 πŸ”— Aranje the first would actually to find the first compelling game that came across my desk and buy the studio making it outright
01:32 πŸ”— joepie91 :D
01:32 πŸ”— joepie91 it's probably one of the few Python libraries that makes me feel all fuzzy inside, knowing that I'm going to do fun things with it
01:32 πŸ”— Aranje and then give them 10x their current budget and tell them to rewrite the game
01:32 πŸ”— joepie91 probably more because of GTK than because of gobject, but still
01:32 πŸ”— Aranje lelz
01:32 πŸ”— joepie91 Aranje: well eh, they kind of tried that
01:32 πŸ”— joepie91 about 40 times
01:32 πŸ”— Aranje oh?
01:33 πŸ”— joepie91 the problem is that if EA acquires a studio, there are two certainties:
01:33 πŸ”— joepie91 1. they are good at game development
01:33 πŸ”— Aranje I haven't seen a new compelling game come out of EA in years
01:33 πŸ”— joepie91 2. within approximately 2 years, they will suck at game development
01:33 πŸ”— omf_ If I ran EA the first thing I would do is stop all current and future projects to take the time to remove drm from all previous games and then sell them all on sale
01:33 πŸ”— omf_ watch the money flow in
01:33 πŸ”— joepie91 I was a bit sad when EA acquired Phenomic :(
01:33 πŸ”— omf_ I was sad when EA got Eidor
01:33 πŸ”— omf_ Eidos
01:33 πŸ”— joepie91 Phenomic is kind of awesome, but since EA has them, they've only made things that sound great in theory but lack in execution
01:33 πŸ”— joepie91 in true EA style
01:34 πŸ”— Aranje culture problem maybe
01:34 πŸ”— joepie91 (Phenomic are the developers of the Spellforce series, by the way(
01:34 πŸ”— joepie91 )*
01:34 πŸ”— Aranje never heard either of those words
01:34 πŸ”— joepie91 (which was perhaps the best RPG/RTS combo I have ever played or seen or heard of)
01:34 πŸ”— Aranje but I haven't played games in ... well actually a long time
01:34 πŸ”— joepie91 their voice acting sucked, everything else was absolutely excellent
01:34 πŸ”— joepie91 it's not a very well known game
01:35 πŸ”— joepie91 picked it up in a budget bin for 5 euro once, without knowing what it was
01:35 πŸ”— joepie91 best purchase ever
01:35 πŸ”— Aranje for reference the last game I received was red orchestra 2
01:35 πŸ”— joepie91 Aranje: I bought this probably >6 years ago
01:35 πŸ”— Aranje yeah
01:36 πŸ”— joepie91 Aranje: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7UCZ3jSn-8
01:36 πŸ”— joepie91 it was apparently on sale on Steam
01:36 πŸ”— joepie91 a week ago
01:36 πŸ”— joepie91 it's also on GOG
01:36 πŸ”— joepie91 (if you prefer DRM free)
01:36 πŸ”— Aranje dunno what gog is
01:36 πŸ”— joepie91 :o
01:36 πŸ”— joepie91 goodoldgames
01:37 πŸ”— joepie91 gog.com
01:37 πŸ”— joepie91 they sell DRM-free games, a lot of patched up old titles as well
01:37 πŸ”— Aranje yeah huh, never heard of it
01:37 πŸ”— joepie91 as in, old games that normally wouldn't run on newer windows versions
01:37 πŸ”— joepie91 but patched to work perfectly
01:37 πŸ”— joepie91 I have not actually bought anything from them for the simple reason that they don't sell Linux games (yet)
01:38 πŸ”— joepie91 but once they start doing so, I'll certainly set aside some money there :)
01:38 πŸ”— joepie91 (assuming they have games I would like to play, ofc)
01:38 πŸ”— joepie91 basically, instead of all kinds of stupid DRM and client crap
01:38 πŸ”— joepie91 you just buy a game, and get a .exe
01:38 πŸ”— Aranje huh
01:38 πŸ”— joepie91 (yes, they are legal)
01:39 πŸ”— joepie91 anyway, have a look at that video I linked :)
01:39 πŸ”— joepie91 hm
01:39 πŸ”— joepie91 no actual gameplay in part 1
01:39 πŸ”— joepie91 wat
01:40 πŸ”— joepie91 try this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkVSMcnAkX8
01:41 πŸ”— joepie91 also, the gameplay time of spellforce is beyond insane
01:41 πŸ”— Aranje heh
01:41 πŸ”— joepie91 you can play it for weeks, and still only be 10% in
01:42 πŸ”— joepie91 without it getting boring
01:42 πŸ”— Aranje In that vein I want to play skyrim on pc
01:42 πŸ”— Aranje I'm locked to the xbox my roommate has it on
01:44 πŸ”— joepie91 aaaanyway
01:44 πŸ”— joepie91 I am going back to GTK stuffs
01:44 πŸ”— joepie91 watch the video ;)
03:34 πŸ”— mistym Wow, one of my Posterous downloads that's been running at ~0.2kbps actually finished downloading.
03:59 πŸ”— balrog mistym: you didn't get banned?
03:59 πŸ”— mistym balrog: Apparently not? I guess I got rate-limited to next to nothing instead.
03:59 πŸ”— balrog weeeeird
04:21 πŸ”— omf_ Just uploaded another linux distro http://archive.org/details/fedora-18_release
04:21 πŸ”— omf_ All linux isos that are official releases are going to live on the IA
06:30 πŸ”— ivan` 2008: "Hitachi aiming for 5TB hard drive by 2010"
06:40 πŸ”— chronomex lol
07:47 πŸ”— godane SketchCow: we really need to fix this collection: https://archive.org/details/twit_home_theater
11:07 πŸ”— godane so i'm forced to back up the pat & stu show now
11:07 πŸ”— godane in video
11:08 πŸ”— godane only cause when there in new york the clip audios are not in the mp3 files
11:18 πŸ”— godane i think i found a way to grab the glenn beck highlights
11:19 πŸ”— godane i say this cause even if we have to block the full episodes we would not have to black the public video on his site that anyone can play
11:20 πŸ”— godane also will maybe able to save clips of the shows that we don't have
11:20 πŸ”— godane example: http://web.gbtv.com/gen/multimedia/detail/2/3/5/19124235.xml
11:21 πŸ”— godane the patten is the last 3 digits
11:23 πŸ”— SmileyG how do they change godane ?
11:23 πŸ”— godane not sure yet
11:24 πŸ”— godane the last but i think its part of the mid variable
11:24 πŸ”— godane url playback_scenario="HTTP_CLOUD_MOBILE" id="7523742" authorization="N" login="N" mid="2012091024654669" cat_code=""
11:25 πŸ”— godane the day 20120910 and the id 24654669 for the xml
11:26 πŸ”— SmileyG that mid is a timecode
11:26 πŸ”— SmileyG 2012 / 09 / 10 - 24674669
12:56 πŸ”— SketchCow Awake.
13:10 πŸ”— SmileyG Mornin
13:19 πŸ”— godane hey SketchCow
13:21 πŸ”— godane i found a video of the guy that first hacked the xbox
13:23 πŸ”— godane more like the guy that explain xbox hacking without a mod chip
13:24 πŸ”— godane he did it for research to get a degree
13:24 πŸ”— godane his name is Andrew "bunnie" Huang
13:35 πŸ”— SketchCow Bunnie
13:35 πŸ”— SketchCow Yeah, we've hung out.
13:45 πŸ”— godane i got a 16 min interview of Geraldo Rivera
14:46 πŸ”— joepie91 <omf_>All linux isos that are official releases are going to live on the IA
14:46 πŸ”— joepie91 that shouldn't be too hard to accomplish :)
14:50 πŸ”— SmileyG joepie91: all the old ones :P
14:51 πŸ”— joepie91 even then
14:51 πŸ”— joepie91 :P
14:51 πŸ”— joepie91 http://ibiblio.org/pub/historic-linux/distributions/
14:51 πŸ”— joepie91 http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/releases/
14:51 πŸ”— joepie91 perhaps http://www.oldlinux.org/
14:52 πŸ”— joepie91 http://www.oldapps.com/linux/ubuntu.php
14:53 πŸ”— joepie91 http://www.oldapps.com/linux/linux_mint.php
14:53 πŸ”— joepie91 http://www.distromania.com/
14:53 πŸ”— SmileyG poke omf_ with em :P
14:54 πŸ”— joepie91 or here: http://www.distromania.com/index.php?distro=all
14:54 πŸ”— joepie91 you just did :P
14:54 πŸ”— SmileyG no funtoo
14:55 πŸ”— joepie91 http://sourceforge.net/projects/cd-linux/files/CDlinux-ISO/
14:56 πŸ”— joepie91 http://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/
14:56 πŸ”— joepie91 ftp://archive.download.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/
14:57 πŸ”— joepie91 http://archive.fedoraproject.org/pub/
14:57 πŸ”— joepie91 http://vault.centos.org/
14:58 πŸ”— joepie91 looks like someone else had the same idea: ftp://ftp.gmd.de/
14:58 πŸ”— joepie91 http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/opensuse/discontinued/
14:58 πŸ”— joepie91 ftp://ftp.hosteurope.de/mirror/ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/discontinued/i386/
14:59 πŸ”— joepie91 http://opensuse.jessen.ch/
14:59 πŸ”— joepie91 http://vectorlinux.com/downloads < this lists a few mirrors with old versions
14:59 πŸ”— SketchCow joepie91: Saw the stuff you linked to
14:59 πŸ”— SketchCow I need more discussion, but yes, I am aiming towards this.
14:59 πŸ”— SketchCow That the link works is the hard part, the rest is just file reading and interp
15:00 πŸ”— SketchCow Which I cna do
15:00 πŸ”— joepie91 re: the mediawiki posting script?
15:00 πŸ”— SketchCow yes
15:00 πŸ”— joepie91 alright
15:00 πŸ”— joepie91 any particular functionality you need added?/
15:00 πŸ”— joepie91 or can I pack it up like this?
15:14 πŸ”— SketchCow Just send it to jason@textfiles.com, I'll fiddle
15:14 πŸ”— SketchCow I have to write a whole set of "things" anyway
15:42 πŸ”— joepie91 alright, will do
16:17 πŸ”— joepie91 SketchCow: sent
16:17 πŸ”— joepie91 included documentation as well
16:17 πŸ”— joepie91 docs are written in http://cryto.net/zippydoc, so you should be able to read the .zpy in a text editor if you don't like HTML docs :P
16:21 πŸ”— joepie91 feel free to pass on, WTFPL or CC0 whichever you prefer, etc etc etc
16:47 πŸ”— joepie91 uh, guys
16:47 πŸ”— joepie91 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/
16:47 πŸ”— joepie91 The Act contains changes to UK copyright law which permit the commercial exploitation of images where information identifying the owner is missing, so-called "orphan works", by placing the work into what's known as "extended collective licensing" schemes. Since most digital images on the internet today are orphans - the metadata is missing or has been stripped by a large organisation - millions of photographs and illustrations are swept
16:47 πŸ”— joepie91 wtf is up with that
16:53 πŸ”— omf_ joepie91, I already have all the iso images, I just have to upload, no need to go out and find them
16:53 πŸ”— joepie91 alright :P
17:03 πŸ”— DFJustin that sounds like a welcome reform actually, one of the big problems with copyright post-berne convention is that everything is automatically copyrighted even if it wasn't intended to be
17:03 πŸ”— DFJustin and so archives avoid working with and preserving 20th century photographs because of copyright paranoia
17:05 πŸ”— joepie91 DFJustin: it is not a welcome reform whatsoever
17:05 πŸ”— joepie91 for these reasons:
17:06 πŸ”— joepie91 1. if the strong implication in the article that this only applies to commercial usage is correct (which it appears to be, as it's an economic act), that means that this kind of "just use it" usage is restricted to just commercial entities
17:06 πŸ”— joepie91 and I hope I won't have to explain why that is bad...
17:06 πŸ”— joepie91 2. it's unclear what exactly is a 'diligent search', and it seems there are more unclear things
17:06 πŸ”— joepie91 which means that the only thing this act brings is uncertainty, and a new 'gray area'
17:07 πŸ”— joepie91 and who have the ability to jump into a gray area and lawyer themselves out of it? exactly, big corporations
17:07 πŸ”— joepie91 for such an act to benefit everyone, there should not be a restriction on commercial usage alone, and the authorship part should be something objective like "if no author is explicitly listed"
17:08 πŸ”— joepie91 in its current form, the only entities that it *really* benefits, are large corporations
17:08 πŸ”— DFJustin I dunno diligence is a standard legal concept, if you are a pro photographer you can put your shit in various well-known repositories where any diligent searcher would find them
17:08 πŸ”— joepie91 (and really, if we're on the topic of copyright disregard anyway, why not just get it over with, and throw copyright out of the window altogether?)
17:09 πŸ”— joepie91 DFJustin: if it's anything like in NL, they will charge you
17:09 πŸ”— joepie91 to put it in said repository
17:09 πŸ”— joepie91 and aside from that, the problem is that diligence is not explicitly defined
17:09 πŸ”— joepie91 and up to interpretation
17:09 πŸ”— DFJustin cost of doing business
17:09 πŸ”— joepie91 even in a legal sense
17:09 πŸ”— joepie91 that's the problem
17:09 πŸ”— joepie91 "cost of doing business"
17:10 πŸ”— joepie91 if I make a photo because I like making photos
17:10 πŸ”— joepie91 then any entity could basically exploit it commercially (and only commercially!)
17:10 πŸ”— joepie91 there is no business, yet it would cost me to protect it
17:10 πŸ”— joepie91 so, wtf
17:10 πŸ”— DFJustin the current system where every metadata-less cell phone picture everywhere is subject to huge copyright liability because the 0.1% of people who are pro photographers would be butthurt is ridiculous
17:10 πŸ”— joepie91 exactly, so get rid of copyright, problem solved
17:10 πŸ”— DFJustin well ok but nobody is going to do that
17:10 πŸ”— joepie91 I mean, this act effectively gives a free pass to exactly the entities most people want to be protected from by copyright law
17:11 πŸ”— joepie91 so we might as well get rid of copyright entirely
17:11 πŸ”— joepie91 while we're at it
17:11 πŸ”— joepie91 <DFJustin>well ok but nobody is going to do that
17:11 πŸ”— joepie91 going to do what?
17:11 πŸ”— DFJustin abolish copyright
17:11 πŸ”— joepie91 perhaps that is the issue
17:12 πŸ”— joepie91 I'm not going to claim that copyright is the most misunderstood legal construct in the world, but it's trying pretty damn hard
17:13 πŸ”— joepie91 nearly noone actually knows how it works - not even when applying it to their own works
17:13 πŸ”— joepie91 and perhaps a handful of people are aware of the original reason for its existence
17:13 πŸ”— joepie91 and the realization that that reason has been... more or less wiped out
17:14 πŸ”— joepie91 if we were to live in a society that had no copyright, yet with the general knowledge of business and psychology that we have now... it would seem absolutely ridiculous to propose introducing the idea of copyright
17:14 πŸ”— joepie91 it has been proven both theoretically and practically that copyright does not actually advance science and arts, and that it actually works against it
17:14 πŸ”— joepie91 (and people are aware of this!)
17:15 πŸ”— SmileyG is thaht not patents#?
17:15 πŸ”— joepie91 you'd be considered a madman to propose introducing copyright to advance science and arts if peole know that that doesn't work
17:15 πŸ”— joepie91 SmileyG: copyright had similar/identical reasoning behind it
17:15 πŸ”— joepie91 basically all of IP does, except for trademarks
17:15 πŸ”— DFJustin no, the advancing arts language in the US constitution applies to both copyright and patents
17:16 πŸ”— joepie91 not just in the constitution
17:16 πŸ”— joepie91 of the US
17:16 πŸ”— DFJustin sure but that's all I know about offhand
17:16 πŸ”— joepie91 I think this is even in the Berne convention, and in all the previously existing IP legislation in other countries
17:16 πŸ”— joepie91 advancement of science/arts is nearly always stated as the reason for introduction
17:16 πŸ”— SmileyG im gonna set out of this convo as i can't se my keyboard
17:16 πŸ”— DFJustin personally I am in favour of "copyright" that only protects against plagiarism/false attribution and leaves everything else fair game
17:17 πŸ”— SmileyG https://secure.flickr.com/photos/djsmiley2k/5262975911/in/set-72157624542185374/ << this is why
17:17 πŸ”— joepie91 despite being proven wrong in theory (the research on how financial incentive does not actually motivate people and all that stuff) and practice (patent trolls, copyright trolls, etc) people still keep defending it
17:17 πŸ”— joepie91 even though IP has basically just become a foundation for a business model now
17:17 πŸ”— joepie91 SmileyG: heh
17:17 πŸ”— joepie91 DFJustin; actually, that's "moral rights"
17:17 πŸ”— joepie91 and I am not quite sure that falls under IP
17:18 πŸ”— joepie91 (legally speaking)
17:18 πŸ”— joepie91 this is also the reason I am leaving trademarks out of the above topic
17:18 πŸ”— joepie91 they serve a similar purpose to moral rights
17:18 πŸ”— DFJustin just because it seems like what young people today assume copyright is http://waxy.org/2011/12/no_copyright_intended/
17:18 πŸ”— joepie91 obviously, when I say "trademarks" I don't mean "the color magentta"
17:19 πŸ”— joepie91 but actual sensible trademarks
17:19 πŸ”— joepie91 DFJustin: indeed
17:19 πŸ”— joepie91 copyright is heavily misunderstood
17:19 πŸ”— DFJustin so since that is what people think it is anyway might as well change it to that
17:19 πŸ”— joepie91 I actually wrote a post a while ago on my blog
17:19 πŸ”— joepie91 about licensing
17:19 πŸ”— joepie91 sec
17:20 πŸ”— joepie91 the questions in the headers here are the questions that I am facing literally every time I bring up licensing to people: http://joepie91.wordpress.com/2013/03/21/licensing-for-beginners/
17:21 πŸ”— joepie91 almost noone that I have ever discussed this with, properly understand how copyright works
17:22 πŸ”— DFJustin I'm well aware of how it all works
17:24 πŸ”— SmileyG mev too
17:25 πŸ”— joepie91 honestly, this channel probably has the highest concentration of copyright-understanding people of any channel I am in
17:25 πŸ”— joepie91 except for perhaps swhack
17:25 πŸ”— joepie91 (but yeah, that makes sense)
17:26 πŸ”— * joepie91 actually added a .license command to the bot in his own channel, to look up licenses
17:35 πŸ”— SmileyG well be happy
17:35 πŸ”— SmileyG i just put mit licence on my github
17:37 πŸ”— joepie91 :D
18:20 πŸ”— Schbirid i just registered at jamendo's developer site with the username "admin"
18:20 πŸ”— Schbirid their stupidity never ceases to sadden me :(
18:22 πŸ”— joepie91 Jamendo is an awesome idea, but their management seems.. less than ideal
18:22 πŸ”— joepie91 ohey, they have a new developer site
18:23 πŸ”— Schbirid they had such an amazing vision once
18:23 πŸ”— joepie91 wait, they discontinued the publicly accessible API?
18:23 πŸ”— joepie91 as in
18:23 πŸ”— joepie91 no-signup
18:23 πŸ”— Schbirid and then they went "oh shit, we have a big team now, we now need to whore ourselves out to money"
18:23 πŸ”— Schbirid yeah
18:24 πŸ”— joepie91 Schbirid: elaborate, because I have the idea that you know more about this than I do
18:24 πŸ”— joepie91 re; vision
18:24 πŸ”— joepie91 ... where have the database dumps gone
18:24 πŸ”— Schbirid they were all about open once
18:24 πŸ”— Schbirid ogg vorbis, ed2k, bittorrent, etc
18:24 πŸ”— Schbirid and that and the api
18:25 πŸ”— Schbirid oops, i accidentaly did startx in a terminal in xfce, now everything is weird
18:25 πŸ”— SmileyG log out
18:25 πŸ”— joepie91 Schbirid: mmm... perhaps it's time to send them an e-mail
18:25 πŸ”— SmileyG i've done it many times
18:25 πŸ”— SmileyG just log out once and you shoul be back to your normal xorg
18:26 πŸ”— Schbirid just logout is no less worse than rebooting :P
18:26 πŸ”— SmileyG no
18:26 πŸ”— SmileyG just log out of the "new" xorg
18:26 πŸ”— SmileyG should dump you back in your running one
18:26 πŸ”— Schbirid ah, i kinda half killed it during its startup
18:26 πŸ”— Schbirid might be been a stupid idea
18:27 πŸ”— SmileyG you can do xorg in xorg in xorg
18:27 πŸ”— SmileyG Schbirid: ah :<
18:27 πŸ”— SmileyG ctrl alt f7?
18:27 πŸ”— Schbirid joepie91: about "hey, i told you about issues and tried to help and gave contructive feedback years ago, do you enjoy your dead community as it is now?"
18:28 πŸ”— Schbirid lol, whatever tty i switch to, i am still here and the top of the screen is garbled
18:28 πŸ”— Schbirid maybe i can blame systemd for this somehow?
18:28 πŸ”— joepie91 Schbirid: mm.
18:29 πŸ”— joepie91 Schbirid: don't underestimate the power of asking :)
18:29 πŸ”— Schbirid asking about what?
18:29 πŸ”— joepie91 asking about anything
18:29 πŸ”— joepie91 "where are the database dumps?"
18:29 πŸ”— joepie91 "why don't you do them anymore?"
18:29 πŸ”— Schbirid i stopped caring
18:29 πŸ”— joepie91 "why is the non-login API gone?"
18:31 πŸ”— Schbirid "please die and let a new better CC music portal take your place, you fucking entrepeneur wanker"
18:31 πŸ”— Schbirid by die i mean jamendo, by wanker i mean the "management"
18:31 πŸ”— Schbirid now you got me all angry :(
18:38 πŸ”— joepie91 Schbirid: interesting twist
18:38 πŸ”— joepie91 since everything on Jamendo is CC
18:39 πŸ”— joepie91 it's possible to just grab whatever they have, and set up your own portal
18:39 πŸ”— joepie91 with that same collection
18:39 πŸ”— joepie91 building off of it
18:48 πŸ”— sep332 "Starting WgetDownload for Item pedobear" O.o
18:49 πŸ”— sep332 first streetfiles job i got lol
18:53 πŸ”— SmileyG LOL
18:54 πŸ”— SmileyG so everything in jamendo needs adding to IA then...
18:55 πŸ”— DFJustin https://archive.org/details/jamendo-albums
18:55 πŸ”— DFJustin granted it hasn't been updated since the api change
18:55 πŸ”— SmileyG ah cool ::D
18:58 πŸ”— Schbirid i dont really like that collection, would have been much nicer to use the vorbis zips as they are higher quality
18:58 πŸ”— Schbirid the vorbis at IA was derived from the mp3
18:58 πŸ”— joepie91 would have been much nicer to have the original FLACs
18:58 πŸ”— joepie91 but Jamendo has *still* not made those available
18:59 πŸ”— joepie91 (yes, they have a WAV or FLAC version for every album)
19:23 πŸ”— SmileyG masn i do love my isp
19:23 πŸ”— SmileyG book a technical visit at 8pm at night, via a pm on the forum?
19:23 πŸ”— SmileyG SWEET.
19:27 πŸ”— chronomex not bad not bad at all
19:28 πŸ”— SmileyG jhust boring consumer level isp
19:28 πŸ”— SmileyG nothign special about this, anyone can do it
19:28 πŸ”— SmileyG just most people perfer to bitch and moan instead of actually seeing if they can get in contact.
19:28 πŸ”— SmileyG I really should see abotu getting a IDE/Sata interface thing for all these spare drives.
19:29 πŸ”— SmileyG I could dump images etc on some of them, rangng from 80gb upto 250....
19:30 πŸ”— SmileyG http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/04/29/err_act_landgrab/ - joepie91 what you make of this?
19:33 πŸ”— chronomex SmileyG: oh that's gooood shit
19:38 πŸ”— joepie91 SmileyG: I linked it earlier.. it's very very bad
19:38 πŸ”— joepie91 incoming
19:38 πŸ”— joepie91 <joepie91>1. if the strong implication in the article that this only applies to commercial usage is correct (which it appears to be, as it's an economic act), that means that this kind of "just use it" usage is restricted to just commercial entities
19:38 πŸ”— joepie91 <joepie91>2. it's unclear what exactly is a 'diligent search', and it seems there are more unclear things
19:38 πŸ”— joepie91 <joepie91>and I hope I won't have to explain why that is bad...
19:38 πŸ”— joepie91 <joepie91>and who have the ability to jump into a gray area and lawyer themselves out of it? exactly, big corporations
19:38 πŸ”— joepie91 <joepie91>for these reasons:
19:38 πŸ”— joepie91 <joepie91>which means that the only thing this act brings is uncertainty, and a new 'gray area'
19:39 πŸ”— SmileyG yeay
19:40 πŸ”— SmileyG if it was "anyone can use it" i.e. cc.....something
19:40 πŸ”— SmileyG cc-na ?
19:40 πŸ”— joepie91 well
19:41 πŸ”— joepie91 this act basically removes the protection against exactly that which most people want copyright to protect them against
19:41 πŸ”— joepie91 so, in essence, you may as well get rid of copyright altogether
19:41 πŸ”— joepie91 :|
19:52 πŸ”— chronomex I approve of copyright absurdism
19:52 πŸ”— chronomex the laws are a farce anyway, it's only logical that they be updated to be meaningless and unenforceable
20:12 πŸ”— joepie91 Doing what Facebook did in March will now considered a 'dangerous' act for Android developers. From now on, apps listed on the Play store can only be available through that channel.
20:12 πŸ”— joepie91 sigh
20:17 πŸ”— SmileyG hmmm i'vel ost my cola :/
20:17 πŸ”— DFJustin can only *update* through that channel apparently
20:17 πŸ”— joepie91 http://ct.zdnet.com/clicks?t=1176759907-12265cf48955ab8b8264d4ce0e1481f5-bf&brand=ZDNET&s=5
20:17 πŸ”— joepie91 right
20:17 πŸ”— DFJustin which I'm ok with
20:18 πŸ”— joepie91 zdnet, y u put tracking URLs in newsletters
20:26 πŸ”— joepie91 http://www.theverge.com/2013/4/29/4283086/comicsalliance-blog-the-latest-aol-property-to-be-shut-down
20:27 πŸ”— joepie91 I'm not quite certain what AOL is up to
20:27 πŸ”— joepie91 actually
20:27 πŸ”— joepie91 this belongs in #at
21:14 πŸ”— * joepie91 is uploading more WARCs and stuff to IA
21:15 πŸ”— joepie91 interesting stuff: https://archive.org/details/WeAreLegionFinal, https://archive.org/details/TranceNuWARC
21:15 πŸ”— joepie91 upload of Zelda Reorchestrated WARCs including music is in progress
21:15 πŸ”— joepie91 as is the upload of the prerelease 'leaked' version of the We Are Legion documentary
21:15 πŸ”— joepie91 and probably more stuff I forgot
21:17 πŸ”— omf_ joepie91, I did that weeks ago http://archive.org/details/zreomusic.com http://archive.org/details/zreo.perix.co.uk
21:18 πŸ”— omf_ all the blog posts, images and audio files
21:18 πŸ”— joepie91 wtf, why didn't the search find it
21:18 πŸ”— omf_ no idea at all
21:18 πŸ”— joepie91 shall I cancel my upload?
21:19 πŸ”— omf_ is it a warc
21:19 πŸ”— joepie91 yes
21:19 πŸ”— omf_ kill it
21:19 πŸ”— joepie91 k
21:19 πŸ”— omf_ I have to extract the audio into a separate item
21:19 πŸ”— joepie91 hm, won't that leave the item intact without any files?
21:20 πŸ”— omf_ how did you upload?
21:20 πŸ”— joepie91 oh, it already finished the first warc
21:20 πŸ”— joepie91 html5 uploader
21:20 πŸ”— omf_ just leave whatever is uploaded
21:20 πŸ”— SmileyG Actually, a "never run outta work mode"
21:21 πŸ”— * joepie91 uploads projectpm wiki warc
21:21 πŸ”— joepie91 SmileyG: ?
21:27 πŸ”— SmileyG joepie91: for the warrior
21:27 πŸ”— SmileyG automatically run 1 job from an alt. project if your chosen project has no work
21:27 πŸ”— SmileyG Just grabbing one job at a time means your always busy, :)
21:27 πŸ”— joepie91 yes, that is a good idea
21:28 πŸ”— joepie91 even better: if there are no active projects, collect stuff into a WARC from some site that may possibly be gone in the future
21:28 πŸ”— * SmileyG suggests on wiki
21:28 πŸ”— joepie91 but is technically not a project yet
21:28 πŸ”— SmileyG yeah we had a tumblr one for testing. :D
21:32 πŸ”— omf_ The real question you have to ask yourself is ArchiveTeam big enough to have pre-emptive downloads of sites when at present we still do not get everything for the projects we have
21:33 πŸ”— omf_ The most important thing is to find out about site closings as fast as possible
21:33 πŸ”— omf_ The faster we get information the more time we can throw at the download.
21:35 πŸ”— SmileyG then myspace, it's gonna go at some point.
21:38 πŸ”— nico_ myspace ? will be hard
21:55 πŸ”— joepie91 omf_: obviously, but I recall there being a time when there were literally no warrior projects
21:56 πŸ”— joepie91 a pre-emptive archive would of course only exist as a fallback if really nothing else is available to do
21:57 πŸ”— joepie91 perhaps a stupid question, but how is the integrity of warrior submissions verified?
22:04 πŸ”— SmileyG nico_: hense getting started early
22:04 πŸ”— SmileyG even if we have the frame work ready to grab sites even before they announce anything
22:05 πŸ”— SmileyG sigh
22:05 πŸ”— SmileyG really need to fix the QoS stuff on my router
22:05 πŸ”— SmileyG except the script just crashes the entire box :(
22:22 πŸ”— * nico_ is interested in backuping fanfiction.net
22:22 πŸ”— nico_ the number of stories that got deleted during my reading :(
22:33 πŸ”— DFJustin there's been a bunch grabbed already https://archive.org/search.php?query=fanfiction%20collection%3Aarchiveteam
22:34 πŸ”— DFJustin code here https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/ffnet-grab
22:39 πŸ”— SmileyG DFJustin: what do I need to do to help?
22:44 πŸ”— joepie91 DFJustin, requests.exceptions.ConnectionError: HTTPConnectionPool(host='fujoshi.at.ninjawedding.org', port=80): Max retries exceeded with url: /request
22:44 πŸ”— joepie91 for ffnet-grab
22:48 πŸ”— DFJustin yeah I think it's designed for a tracker that's not up anymore
22:49 πŸ”— DFJustin but the core stuff is there
22:49 πŸ”— DFJustin don't remember who was doing it before
22:51 πŸ”— joepie91 without a tracker it's not very useful, though :P
22:56 πŸ”— nico_ hum
22:57 πŸ”— nico_ how much do you think it will take ?
23:03 πŸ”— dashcloud Backblaze put out their storage pod v3 design earlier this year (near the end of February): http://blog.backblaze.com/2013/02/20/180tb-of-good-vibrations-storage-pod-3-0/ 6 of those pods will give you a PB of storage capacity
23:37 πŸ”— SketchCow Back
23:45 πŸ”— dashcloud hi

irclogger-viewer