#archiveteam-bs 2013-12-21,Sat

↑back Search

Time Nickname Message
00:29 πŸ”— xmc iirc, facebook is https
00:29 πŸ”— xmc warcproxy doesn't do https, I don't know about warcprox
00:29 πŸ”— xmc someone needs to come up with a better name next time they write an archiving proxy :)
01:46 πŸ”— kyan xmc, warcprox does do https.
01:47 πŸ”— kyan xmc, I didn't get the facebook post unfortunately though since I wasn't expecting it to vanish like thatҀ¦
01:47 πŸ”— kyan :(
01:53 πŸ”— BiggieJon yaaaa, target is fsck'd
01:54 πŸ”— kyan It probably could have happened to pretty much any storeҀ¦
01:54 πŸ”— BiggieJon havent really heard what actually happened
01:54 πŸ”— kyan I don't think they're saying
01:55 πŸ”— BiggieJon they were not useing any excryption on the termionals
01:55 πŸ”— BiggieJon so FAIL
01:55 πŸ”— BiggieJon i cant type either
01:55 πŸ”— kyan apparently the crack was nationwide tooҀ¦ I would assume that compromising one store compromises all of them
01:56 πŸ”— kyan not good architecture I dare say
01:56 πŸ”— BiggieJon AND they already had a major breach a while back, so they should have know that there was an issue with their crappy credit card terminals
01:56 πŸ”— kyan Hasn't lost me as a customer though, they still seem like one of the saner stores around
01:57 πŸ”— kyan I'll just be paying with cash though lol
01:58 πŸ”— kyan I hate how bands delete their old music
01:58 πŸ”— kyan the bands AJR and Darkside of Innocence both nuke their music off youtube and soundcloud respectively on a regular basis
01:59 πŸ”— kyan (from their own channels that is)
02:34 πŸ”— xmc that's fucked
02:34 πŸ”— xmc but whatever
02:37 πŸ”— kyan they probably figure their newer stuff is better
02:37 πŸ”— kyan lol
02:38 πŸ”— kyan it's all good in my opinion
02:39 πŸ”— kyan and some of my favorite tracks have gotten deleted eternally
02:40 πŸ”— kyan (from public view at least, my burned CDs say otherwise)
02:40 πŸ”— kyan but it still doesn't seem like a good policy
03:08 πŸ”— Coderjoe from the sound of it, it was malware that was installed on pretty much all POS systems at the chain
03:08 πŸ”— Coderjoe there have been POS breaches in the past that involved hardware mods to add skimming and retransmission hardware to the card reader devices
03:18 πŸ”— DFJustin I can sort of see commercial bands that want to just use the internet for promoting new releases
03:18 πŸ”— DFJustin but amateur musicians take down stuff all the time (or neglect to reupload when external forces take it down) and it bugs me a lot
03:22 πŸ”— kyan I imagine more people will get disappointed about AJR in the near futureҀ¦ they are rapidly becoming more popular, and all of their stuff from ~2009 is (as far as I know) gone
03:45 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: AJR?
03:46 πŸ”— kyan joepie91, a band. They delete their old music
03:46 πŸ”— kyan it makes me sad
03:46 πŸ”— joepie91 wat, why
03:46 πŸ”— kyan they got featured in billboard recently, but basically none of their earlier music exists
03:46 πŸ”— kyan idk
03:46 πŸ”— kyan maybe they think the newer music is better
03:47 πŸ”— kyan they used to do more of an acoustic country-ish sound, now they do electronic pop
03:47 πŸ”— kyan but I don't know if there's any of that old style music publically available now
03:47 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: can you get me a tracklisting?
03:48 πŸ”— kyan joepie91, some of it. I added some of earlier stuff to musicbrainz a long time ago
03:48 πŸ”— joepie91 and I'll schedule in some internet scouring somewhere in the next few weeks or so :)
03:48 πŸ”— kyan 1 sec
03:48 πŸ”— joepie91 aha
03:48 πŸ”— joepie91 discogs have anything?
03:48 πŸ”— kyan I'll look, I don't know discogs as well
03:49 πŸ”— kyan joepie91, http://musicbrainz.org/artist/2eb55bd9-cfbf-44fd-a5da-92dd825284c7
03:49 πŸ”— arkhive People that have the DS/DSi/3DS demo/download station/kiosk game packs need to dump/copy/upload them.
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 unrelatedly, holy shit, telegraph.co.uk actually _gets_ it
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/jamiebartlett/100011868/one-day-amazon-will-accept-bitcoins-thats-when-central-banks-and-governments-get-nervous/
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 "As a result of manic currency speculation, its value against the dollar is highly erratic."
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 not "value"
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 but "value against the dollar"
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 probably the first time I've seen any media outlet do this right
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 ever
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 arkhive: there's a bunch floating around on shitty ROM sites
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 and in ROM packs
03:49 πŸ”— joepie91 in torrents
03:50 πŸ”— arkhive oh
03:50 πŸ”— joepie91 they're not very hard to find, just a pain to actually download
03:50 πŸ”— joepie91 because of these shitty "vote for us first" ROM sites and such
03:50 πŸ”— joepie91 and sometimes you'll need to download a 1k ROM pack to find a few kiosk packs
03:50 πŸ”— kyan joepie91, discogs has only one thing http://www.discogs.com/artist/2308877-AJR
03:50 πŸ”— joepie91 because they're all 7z'd or whatever
03:50 πŸ”— kyan that I see
03:50 πŸ”— joepie91 and have no game listing
03:51 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: hm, that seems a false positive
03:51 πŸ”— kyan no, I'm pretty sure that's them
03:51 πŸ”— joepie91 really? hm
03:51 πŸ”— kyan they are into ukelele
03:51 πŸ”— kyan in a big way
03:51 πŸ”— kyan so I would not be surprised
03:52 πŸ”— kyan I'll see if I can find another connection
03:52 πŸ”— arkhive and these. http://www.ebay.com/itm/16gbit-Nintendo-3DS-Development-Cartridge-/221338243453?pt=Video_Games_Games&hash=item3388c9917d people who buy these should dump 'em
03:52 πŸ”— arkhive i don't know if they do usually
03:52 πŸ”— kyan their official website: http://ajrbrothers.com/
03:52 πŸ”— kyan I have a bit of their old music, and some of their newer that has gotten pulled from youtube
03:53 πŸ”— kyan but what I have is by no means comprehensive, and is mostly just mp3s/mp4s or burned CDs, no WARCs
03:53 πŸ”— kyan joepie91, http://thebeatlescompleteonukulele.com/2011/06/128-the-night-before-ajr/ Not a false positive.
03:53 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: doesn't have to be WARC :)
03:53 πŸ”— kyan Well it's a lot nicer that way
03:53 πŸ”— joepie91 WARC is really just for web stuff
03:53 πŸ”— joepie91 don't need that for music
03:53 πŸ”— kyan I got it all from the web
03:54 πŸ”— joepie91 well yes, but for actual web archives I mean :P
03:54 πŸ”— kyan and now wish I had known about warcs when I got it
03:54 πŸ”— joepie91 not just something that happens to be on the web as a file
03:54 πŸ”— joepie91 but actual pages
03:54 πŸ”— joepie91 also, kyan, a shitty MP3 is better than nothing
03:54 πŸ”— joepie91 :)
03:54 πŸ”— kyan lol
03:54 πŸ”— joepie91 so by all means upload it to IA if you can
03:54 πŸ”— kyan I'm not so sure about copyright, I'll probably ask to have it darked I guess
03:55 πŸ”— kyan re warcs, I'm youtube-dl-ing a few channels right now and running it all through warcprox
03:55 πŸ”— kyan I think warcs are nice to have for everything
03:55 πŸ”— kyan heh
03:55 πŸ”— kyan although I' m no expert
03:58 πŸ”— DFJustin well worst case IA gets a letter and it gets darked later
03:58 πŸ”— DFJustin so why dark pre-emptively
03:58 πŸ”— joepie91 ^
03:58 πŸ”— joepie91 basically, just upload
03:58 πŸ”— joepie91 if the artists care, they'll get it darked
03:59 πŸ”— kyan well worst case I get my ass sued
03:59 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: doubtful
03:59 πŸ”— joepie91 just a moment :)
03:59 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: http://falkvinge.net/2013/02/09/youre-still-more-likely-to-get-hit-by-lightning-than-convicted-from-sharing-culture/
04:00 πŸ”— kyan How does that compare in the US?
04:02 πŸ”— kyan I hear about cases with thousands of defendants, I don't like the sound of that
04:10 πŸ”— chavezery i listened to one song by ajr and now i can't stop ;_;
04:19 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: like what cases?
04:19 πŸ”— joepie91 because the only case I am aware of is the porn troll case
04:19 πŸ”— joepie91 everything else is just lawyers barking
04:22 πŸ”— kyan joepie91, I don't know the details of it, but I just found this http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/blogs/thr-esq/class-action-targets-law-firm-49753
04:23 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: that was killed off some time ago afaik
04:23 πŸ”— joepie91 anyway
04:23 πŸ”— kyan hmm
04:23 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: let's assume that there are currently 50,000 running cases for copyright infringement against individuals
04:24 πŸ”— joepie91 which is likely faaaaaaar more than the actual amount of serious cases
04:24 πŸ”— joepie91 how many people live in the US?
04:26 πŸ”— kyan 300 million or so
04:27 πŸ”— kyan what would need to be compared is the rate of people sharing copyright-restricted content to the rate of cases
04:27 πŸ”— kyan rather than population
04:28 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: yes, I was going to get there in a moment
04:28 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: let's take a very conservative estimate; 25% of the population 'pirates' on average one thing a month
04:29 πŸ”— joepie91 in some way, shape or form
04:29 πŸ”— joepie91 that's 75 million cases of 'infringement' per month
04:29 πŸ”— joepie91 court cases typically drag on for at least 6 months
04:29 πŸ”— joepie91 so for court cases currently running, we assume that's comparable with 6 months of piracy overall
04:30 πŸ”— joepie91 6 * 75 = 450 million cases
04:30 πŸ”— joepie91 of which 50,000 would have gone to court
04:30 πŸ”— joepie91 0.00011111111111111112
04:30 πŸ”— joepie91 >>> 50000 / 450000000.0
04:30 πŸ”— joepie91 so that'd be a 0.01% chance of getting in trouble, even with these worst-case estimates
04:31 πŸ”— kyan Hmm
04:31 πŸ”— joepie91 seems like an okay chance to take for archiving something that's not otherwise available :0
04:31 πŸ”— joepie91 :) *
04:31 πŸ”— kyan Suppose so.
04:32 πŸ”— joepie91 hell, I'll even upload it for you if you want
04:32 πŸ”— joepie91 then it won't even have your email on it
04:32 πŸ”— kyan Hehe, it's an option
04:32 πŸ”— kyan XD
04:34 πŸ”— kyan I've got several things that could use to be archived though, I should probably go through all my data and archive it somehow
04:34 πŸ”— joepie91 :P
04:34 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: meh, if you want me to upload it, let me know and I'll get you an rsync endpoint on my archiving box that you can send stuff to
04:34 πŸ”— joepie91 preferably with some kind of metadata in a file so I don't have to figure that all out by myself :)
04:35 πŸ”— joepie91 (title/artist/date/description/blah)
04:35 πŸ”— kyan Even the most popular of media should be archived. It would be nice if there was a method of recording what has been sent to IA
04:35 πŸ”— kyan Right
04:35 πŸ”— joepie91 how do you mean recording what has been sent to IA?
04:35 πŸ”— kyan so that it could be tracked what files are available, even if darked
04:35 πŸ”— joepie91 ah, in that sense
04:35 πŸ”— joepie91 m
04:35 πŸ”— joepie91 hm *
04:35 πŸ”— kyan Keep a database somewhere with a list of identifiers and descriptions
04:36 πŸ”— joepie91 not sure about the legal consequences of something like that, but you could email them
04:36 πŸ”— joepie91 (IA)
04:36 πŸ”— kyan (and quality)
04:36 πŸ”— joepie91 did I mention that I fucking despise copyright and other "intellectual property" law? :P
04:36 πŸ”— kyan Hm. Or even leave off the identifiers, just do it on the honor system
04:36 πŸ”— chavezery joepie: most sensible people hate those :v
04:37 πŸ”— kyan any time there's something that should be archived, could just send it out, request it be darked, and mention the item and the quality
04:37 πŸ”— kyan I think copyright is a necessity, in a certain form
04:37 πŸ”— kyan otherwise plagiarism would be all over the place
04:37 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: "plagiarism" is an invented problem
04:37 πŸ”— kyan but I think copyright should a) legally require archiving and b) require attribution and c) have that be just about it
04:38 πŸ”— kyan no it's not, it's terrible for record keeping
04:38 πŸ”— joepie91 it isn't a real problem
04:38 πŸ”— joepie91 nor a justification for copyright
04:38 πŸ”— joepie91 nor the reason copyright exists in the first place
04:38 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: that is the problem of the record keepers
04:38 πŸ”— joepie91 let's not make that the problem of all of society
04:39 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: IP was originally introduced to provide a monopoly period in which the creator could recoup their investments (whether financial or in time), and to encourage them to release it publicly so that it'd eventually end up in the public domain
04:39 πŸ”— joepie91 the final goal was to accelerate progress in science and arts
04:39 πŸ”— kyan ok, but I think it should be to enforce good record keeping
04:39 πŸ”— joepie91 there is no conclusive evidence that IP legislation is doing that
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 there IS conclusive evidence that it's doing the opposite
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 ergo, IP law has no right of existence
04:40 πŸ”— kyan oh current legislation is all bullsh#7
04:40 πŸ”— kyan it's got too much complication
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 it's not the complication
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 it's the core idea
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 that doesn't work
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 there is no point in "reforming copyright law"
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 the base premise is still broken
04:40 πŸ”— kyan hmm, I disagree with that
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 and has always been broken
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 it's a failed experiment
04:40 πŸ”— joepie91 which is fine, but it's time to abandon that experiment and move on
04:41 πŸ”— joepie91 also, kyan: I have absolutely no idea at this point what exactly your problem re: record-keeping is
04:42 πŸ”— kyan hmm. I think the laws should be: Attribution is necessary for any derivative work. Any information published must be added to a centralized archival system upon publication.
04:42 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: that is absolutely ridiculous
04:42 πŸ”— joepie91 and completely not scalable
04:42 πŸ”— kyan When a creator wants this information removed, it must be removed from public view but retained in the archive
04:42 πŸ”— joepie91 again, nonsense
04:42 πŸ”— kyan Hmm isn't that pretty much what IA is doing
04:43 πŸ”— joepie91 if you do not want something to be public, don't make it public
04:43 πŸ”— joepie91 it's as simple as that
04:43 πŸ”— joepie91 you've also omitted any reasoning as to why "attribution is necessary"
04:43 πŸ”— kyan people make mistakes, the law should respect that
04:43 πŸ”— kyan people have a right to their privacy
04:43 πŸ”— joepie91 ...
04:43 πŸ”— joepie91 that's two false arguments
04:43 πŸ”— kyan even if they screw up
04:43 πŸ”— kyan attribution: necessary so that incorrect assumptions regarding authorship are avoided
04:44 πŸ”— joepie91 1. people make mistakes, the law DOES NOT normally respect that - and it's madness to respect it for certain mistakes but not for others, especially when that has other social implications
04:44 πŸ”— joepie91 2. people have a right to their privacy, but that is ENTIRELY unrelated to this
04:44 πŸ”— kyan What's the other mistake?
04:44 πŸ”— joepie91 privacy is the ability to choose for yourself whether to reveal certain information or not
04:44 πŸ”— joepie91 when you make something public, you have made that decision
04:44 πŸ”— kyan Privacy: On the contrary, quite related.
04:44 πŸ”— joepie91 and any privacy arguments fail to apply
04:44 πŸ”— kyan I would have to disagree
04:44 πŸ”— joepie91 disagree with?
04:45 πŸ”— kyan "when you make something public, you have made that decision"
04:45 πŸ”— kyan I think people should have a right to remove information, to a limited extent, from the public eye
04:45 πŸ”— joepie91 what is there to disagree with? that is a logical conclusion
04:45 πŸ”— joepie91 because?
04:45 πŸ”— joepie91 what gives them that right?
04:46 πŸ”— kyan If they are the creators: it is their work and that right should be inseparable from the act of authorship.
04:46 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: says who?
04:46 πŸ”— joepie91 and it's not "their work"
04:46 πŸ”— joepie91 it's the work of them and everybody who made something that it derives from
04:46 πŸ”— joepie91 which is quite literally always the case
04:47 πŸ”— kyan I think the originality qualifications in current copyright law should be applied to the determining of authorship
04:47 πŸ”— kyan While a work may not be entirely non-derivative, it can still be an original work showing sufficient creativity to distinguish it from previous works
04:47 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: irrelevant
04:47 πŸ”— joepie91 it's still a derivative
04:48 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: you seem to be arguing not from reason or moral viewpoints, but from a "this is what we consider important right now" point of view
04:48 πŸ”— joepie91 that doesn't work when you're trying to come to a reasonable conclusion
04:48 πŸ”— joepie91 because you're always going to be stuck with things that somehow were a consequence of past mismanagement
04:48 πŸ”— kyan I don't generally worry too much about reasonable conclusions
04:48 πŸ”— joepie91 I do.
04:48 πŸ”— kyan I just have opinions lol
04:49 πŸ”— kyan and because I'm awesome, they must be right. Hey, it's a pretty good rationale if you ask me XD
04:49 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: my point is, there ARE no original works - it is futile to try and indicate authorship, and society has no benefit from this
04:49 πŸ”— joepie91 additionally, there is nothing that inherently gives somebody the right to remove particular information from public view after exposure
04:49 πŸ”— kyan I think there are derivative works with originality.
04:49 πŸ”— joepie91 feel free to argue those points, but with something other than how it is right now, or consequences thereof
04:50 πŸ”— kyan I don't much care how it is right now, beyond that it's all screwed up.
04:50 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: I said "original works", not "with originality"
04:50 πŸ”— joepie91 you do care how it is right now
04:50 πŸ”— kyan Which is why I said originality.
04:50 πŸ”— joepie91 your previous arguments were built on it
04:50 πŸ”— kyan Not with pertinence to this discussion
04:50 πŸ”— joepie91 <kyan>If they are the creators: it is their work and that right should be inseparable from the act of authorship.
04:51 πŸ”— joepie91 the only basis I can find here is how "authorship" is perceived -right now-
04:51 πŸ”— joepie91 which is colored by existing IP law
04:51 πŸ”— kyan Ok.
04:51 πŸ”— kyan I'll revise that statement to clarify.
04:52 πŸ”— kyan If someone has created a work that shows substantial distinction from existing works, he or she has a right to remove this new work from public circulation.
04:53 πŸ”— kyan (on the other hand, this creator would not necessarily have a right to remove derivative works thereof from public circulation.)
04:53 πŸ”— joepie91 kyan: because?
04:54 πŸ”— kyan Because they made it what it is.
04:54 πŸ”— kyan Not a good answer, but it's late at night.
04:54 πŸ”— joepie91 indeed not a good answer :P
04:54 πŸ”— joepie91 perhaps get back to me later with an answer to that
04:54 πŸ”— kyan lol ok, I'll sleep on it
04:55 πŸ”— kyan also an issue: misrepresentation of a creator's intention in a derivative work: should be illegal
04:55 πŸ”— joepie91 ?
04:56 πŸ”— kyan I'll be back in the morning with a fresh rant prepared on this discussion.
04:56 πŸ”— kyan XD
04:57 πŸ”— kyan I love ranting, it's so much fun. And now I'm getting punchy, so ttyl
04:58 πŸ”— joepie91 :)
04:58 πŸ”— joepie91 goodnight
04:59 πŸ”— kyan_away :)
05:48 πŸ”— godane i'm grabbing the wall builders live podcast
06:09 πŸ”— godane it start in 2006 but i can only go as far back as 2012
09:15 πŸ”— godane i'm emailing the wall builders live people
09:15 πŸ”— godane i'm hoping to know why old links are removed
09:28 πŸ”— godane emailed sent
13:26 πŸ”— godane i'm uploading 2 pc novice magazines
13:26 πŸ”— godane 1996-05 and 1996-06 issues
13:27 πŸ”— godane there going into my godaneinbox
13:39 πŸ”— godane uploaded: https://archive.org/details/pc-novice-1996-05
13:39 πŸ”— godane uploaded: https://archive.org/details/pc-novice-1996-06
13:47 πŸ”— joepie91 lol
13:48 πŸ”— joepie91 As a thank you for being one of our earliest customers, we're offering you a special discount: $10 off the regular price of $49.95 per year - just $39.95 for a year of Mailstrom! (And save $19.45 over a $4.95 per month standard subscription!)
13:48 πŸ”— joepie91 As one of our earliest users and advocates, your free access to Mailstrom will continue through January 6, 2014 Ҁ” after that, Mailstrom will become a subscription service in order to continue to expand and add great new features!
13:48 πŸ”— joepie91 GOSH THANKS FOR THE GREAT OFFER
13:48 πŸ”— joepie91 asshats, lol
13:49 πŸ”— joepie91 it'd be a drop in the financial bucket to grandfather in the "earliest users"
13:49 πŸ”— joepie91 into a free plan
14:27 πŸ”— godane i'm grabbing the blackcats-games forums
15:48 πŸ”— arkiver sorted the projects list to the dates when they are closing:
15:48 πŸ”— arkiver http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Projects
19:40 πŸ”— chavezery i don't much care for liberals or conservatives (at least the politicians) :|
19:46 πŸ”— chavezery http://liberapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Libertarianism
19:46 πŸ”— chavezery :|||||||||
22:26 πŸ”— Coderjoe http://boingboing.net/2013/12/21/discordian-archive-rescued-fro.html
22:34 πŸ”— Coderjoe http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2013/12/20/politwoops-2013-the-years-top-politicians-and-their-best-deletions-from-twitter/

irclogger-viewer