[00:50] looks like a lot of flak in the ars technica article... :/ [00:53] which one? [09:31] http://whois.domaintools.com/107.175.255.255 [09:31] grrrr [09:31] ? [09:31] Kenshin: ColoCrossing [09:31] look at the size of that range [09:32] yes can see that, lol [09:32] /14 [09:32] wtf. [09:32] they apparently had that assigned today [09:32] well, probably cooked up enough justification [09:32] ip hoarding [09:32] yeah [09:32] I assume you've followed the drama? [09:32] about their IP allocation crap [09:32] yeah, but again there's not much anyone can do [09:33] if not (and for anybody else): https://vpsboard.com/topic/3026-colocrossing-makes-list-of-largest-arin-free-pool-ip-acquirers-in-2013 [09:33] ARIN approved it, they aren't going to eat their words [09:33] Kenshin: mm, ARIN can [09:33] idk about that [09:33] they just approved it, lol [09:33] u think they're going to say "we made a boo boo" [09:33] ARIN can (and has) withdrawn ranges [09:34] well, u guys can try to raise a case [09:34] i've done this with APNIC in the past [09:34] so i know it's possible to smoke your way through [09:34] when i was still starting out, i had ONE rack and i managed to get a /20 [09:35] that was some good 8 years ago, where virtualiation was just vmware [09:36] so really, i'm not surprised they can get away with this :) [09:37] mmm [09:38] Kenshin: I'll just continue digging around people I know, to try and see if any of them has a direct line to ARIN [09:38] I'm sure that others have filled in the fraud reporting form already [09:38] but I'd imagine that those might get drowned in a lot of non-sense reports [09:38] (as is usually the case for abuse/fraud forms) [09:42] yeah but in cc's case, they probably already submitted the documentation [09:42] for the usage [10:07] Kenshin: that doesn't mean that the allocations cannot be revoked if the documentation turns out to be manufactured and/or pumped up to look bigger than it really is [10:53] so i'm going to be going after kcm.org now [10:53] it has videos going back to 2002 [11:25] CelestialIntervention is ready :) [11:27] uploaded: https://archive.org/details/Believers_Voice_of_Victory_Video_20020922 [11:31] uploaded: https://archive.org/details/Believers_Voice_of_Victory_Video_20020929 [12:03] so Kenneth Copeland Ministries will be getting a full backup at some point: [12:03] https://archive.org/search.php?query=creator%3A%22Kenneth%20Copeland%20Ministries%22 [13:02] http://owely.com/433GAe [15:14] http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Drunken_Archiving [15:18] what [15:19] meta-archiving [15:23] and at the next wikiteam cronjob' run [15:23] at' wiki will be uploaded to archive.org [19:55] http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/kungfury/kung-fury [19:55] Ravenloft: that looks awesome [19:55] also, the Power Glove [20:45] http://sprunge.us/FBHS?php [20:45] wtfphp [20:52] so I've taken a bunch of photos of a manual. They aren't cropped or anything (still have background and such visible). Some have two pages per photo; some have one (for fine print parts lists, warranty card, etc.). How can I go about turning them into a more useful format (a PDF with an OCRed clear text layer, or something)? Thanks. [20:54] kyan: Scan Tailor is probably a good start, though scans really are better than photos for things that aren't purely text :) [20:55] ahhh I don't have a scanner really big enough for most stuff [20:56] I'll look at scan tailor, thanks :) [21:02] kyan: if you need a cheap A4 scanner, the Canon LiDes are pretty good [21:02] and cheap [21:02] like 30 or 40 bucks or something stupid like that [21:02] reasonably fast, USB-powered, and pretty good scan quality [21:04] it's no professional scanner, but I did scan these with one of them: https://archive.org/stream/DonaldDuckNL-1989-04/dd-1989-04 [21:04] (that's a donald duck magazine from 1989) [21:04] Thanks. Mine is long enough for a4, and theoretically wide enough for letter, but it misses about â" of each side of the sheet [21:05] which isn't a problem for most things, but since I'm archiving stuff I want to get all of the margins included (even if it's blank) [21:05] looks like gamepro issue 5 and 12 are now scanned by retromags [21:05] kyan: wait, how big is taht manual [21:05] grabbing issue 12 of gamepro now [21:05] I haven't ever seen manuals larger than A4 [21:05] it's letter size [21:06] (8.5"x11") [21:06] nor scanners long enough for A4 but not wide enough [21:06] I think [21:06] it doesn't hit A4 width? [21:06] no it hits a4 width fine [21:06] as well as letter width [21:06] I'm confused as to how it doesn't fit then [21:06] but I'm not very good at US sizes [21:06] lol [21:06] the glass is letter width, but the image only picks up about letter width minus 3/8" on each side [21:07] wha [21:07] are you sure you haven't misconfigured it [21:07] nope [21:07] it should pick up the entire glass [21:07] I know nothing at all about configuring things lol [21:07] what scanning software are you using? [21:07] I bought it off New Egg for a discount [21:07] Simple Scan. [21:07] hmm, can you try xsane? [21:07] I've had good luck with xsane for stubborn scanners in the past [21:08] including strange size auto-configurations [21:08] sure, I don't have the scanner with me (in my dorm room, Im' on Christmas break) but when I get back to school I will [21:08] alright :) [21:08] Cool. I'll definitely try it out. Simple Scan doesn't really have any configuration [21:08] just choose Text or Photo and it rocks and rolls [21:08] and leaves off the margins [21:09] Thanks :) [23:27] http://s23.postimg.org/6d6621r8b/Windows2k_get_owned.jpg [23:27] lol [23:30] Schbirid: how much data is it in total or do you have the possibility to keep this machine up after 30c3? [23:34] it's spread over 3 harddisks atm, 1.9T, 719G and 222G. [23:34] i could keep it up with 50kilobytes/s upstream :P [23:35] i guess i could try to ask the local ccc verein if i could host them there for a while but i have no time for that in january and need the free space [23:35] how slow is the rsync for you? [23:37] about .6MB/s [23:38] if needed i can send you a harddrive to copy the data and send it back to me [23:41] hm, it easily maxes out my 6mbit (~650kilobytes/s). and i tried some networkingo on it earlier where i got full 100mbit [23:44] thats about the max im getting now. 650KB/s [23:45] is that your home connection's limit? [23:45] short bursts to 1.5Mbit [23:45] limited to 20MB/s [23:45] that being about 180Mbit [23:46] sounds like shit routing :( [23:46] hrm, trying on some of my servers i only get ~1.5Mbyte/s [23:49] shit :( [23:49] i'll launch a http server in ~10 minutes [23:49] bedtime, wont see anything here until tomorrow [23:50] ok [23:50] try http://151.217.55.80:12345 in an hour or so, then just wget -m or something smart with parallel download threads or something. later rsyncing is cheap if we get the data across [23:50] night y:) [23:50] nn [23:53] oh, i have irc on it :) [23:53] lol irc on the nas? [23:57] heh, that poor thing struggles making the directory index [23:58] some small meltdown issues might be expected [23:58] nas devices usally dont have the cpu power for this