Time |
Nickname |
Message |
00:19
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
Apparently, Windows has a problem with environmental variables allowing execution as well: http://thesecurityfactory.be/command-injection-windows.html |
00:35
🔗
|
joepie91 |
ha |
00:43
🔗
|
godane |
SketchCow: i'm going to be upload twit episodes from 2010 |
00:44
🔗
|
godane |
just know there are 2009 episodes that i uploaded to community videos |
00:45
🔗
|
godane |
also episodes NSFW_161 and NSFW_162 was uploaded by someone else so they have to be moved to the NSFW collection |
01:01
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
Someone may want to let the IA know that they have been added to a blacklist somewhere. My ISP sent me an email about going to a website that serves malware. When I tried to email them, I got an email stating it was blocked as it was to a known spammer. |
01:02
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
On second reading, it mentioned something called SORBS. |
01:05
🔗
|
Diesel_ |
SORBS is an email black list |
01:08
🔗
|
Diesel_ |
I'm not seeing them on any email black lists |
01:08
🔗
|
Diesel_ |
http://mxtoolbox.com/SuperTool.aspx?action=blacklist%3aarchive.org&run=toolpage# |
01:13
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/dfc0f5c1e1a6bf0152d65d16eead74361cf8f299f3b00616044e81f4004965f7/analysis/ shows two warnings |
01:14
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
maybe my ISP is just behind on the delisting due to caching the list or something. |
01:15
🔗
|
joepie91 |
aaaaaaaaa: IA ends up on spam/malware lists sometimes |
01:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
had them removed from a list a few weeks ago |
01:16
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
why? |
01:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
(you can generally just email them and go "hey, this is the internet archive, probably shouldn't be on a list") |
01:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
aaaaaaaaa: because sometimes people upload malware to IA |
01:16
🔗
|
joepie91 |
lol |
01:17
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
yeah, obvious answer. I guess I just expected the list people to know about them, especially if this has happened before. |
01:23
🔗
|
joepie91 |
aaaaaaaaa: these lists are typically automatically compiled, using honeypots etc |
04:51
🔗
|
godane |
so in the last day i have uploaded over 2k items |
07:28
🔗
|
ersi |
damn godane. damn. |
07:28
🔗
|
ersi |
That's plenty many |
07:42
🔗
|
godane |
ersi: thats cause of the ERIC archives collection will have over 40k pdfs |
16:48
🔗
|
joepie91 |
.tw https://twitter.com/joepie91/status/521703527480311810 |
16:48
🔗
|
botpie91 |
"Asset seizures fuel police spending" http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2014/10/11/cash-seizures-fuel-police-spending/ Seizures? There's a much more appropriate word for this practice: Theft. (@joepie91) |
16:51
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
You should read some of the case names in asset forfeiture proceedings. Some are quite humorous. |
16:52
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
a good one is United States v. Article Consisting of 50,000 Cardboard Boxes More or Less, Each Containing One Pair of Clacker Balls. |
16:52
🔗
|
xmc |
they redeem the whole practice |
16:54
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
Here are some of the more famous ones: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_civil_forfeiture_case_law |
16:54
🔗
|
joepie91 |
aaaaaaaaa: hahaha what |
16:54
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
Of course, there is also the ones where they take people's homes. |
16:55
🔗
|
joepie91 |
wat |
16:57
🔗
|
joepie91 |
aaaaaaaaa: wat? |
16:58
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
http://www.forbes.com/sites/instituteforjustice/2014/08/26/philadelphia-civil-forfeiture-class-action-lawsuit/ |
16:58
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
that is just one example of when forfeiture turns evil. |
16:59
🔗
|
godane |
so i got another 2TB hard driv |
16:59
🔗
|
godane |
*drive |
17:01
🔗
|
joepie91 |
aaaaaaaaa: *turns* evil? |
17:01
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I'm having a hard time finding a way in which it wasn't evil to begin with |
17:01
🔗
|
godane |
i just noticed byte magazine collection really doesn't have much past 1987 |
17:10
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
What about huge drug busts or illegal weaponry or cases of fraud? |
17:11
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
At a minimum, I would support disgorgement |
17:11
🔗
|
joepie91 |
aaaaaaaaa: aside from the entire concept of forfeiture in the US (apparently) not requiring conviction and thus being extra evil regardless of the alleged (or non-alleged?) crime being committed |
17:11
🔗
|
joepie91 |
I fail to see how seizure of assets in those cases is desirable for anybody other than the entity profiting off it |
17:12
🔗
|
joepie91 |
the common argument is "well, it deters criminals" |
17:12
🔗
|
joepie91 |
but that one gets a very big [citation needed] stamp from me |
17:12
🔗
|
joepie91 |
especially because that argument does not /at all/ align with how markets work |
17:12
🔗
|
joepie91 |
(which is to say that such seizures are just considered a risk of business, and thus just become a part of the price that the end user pays for the products or services being sold, not harming the people perpetrating the "crime", but the customers) |
17:14
🔗
|
joepie91 |
and on top of all that, the question "are drug busts even a good thing?" |
17:14
🔗
|
joepie91 |
which I'd tend to answer with "no" |
17:23
🔗
|
balrog |
godane: do you scan magazines that people mail to you? |
17:24
🔗
|
balrog |
have a pile of old dr. dobbs journals |
17:28
🔗
|
godane |
i have not scanned in close to a year |
17:28
🔗
|
balrog |
ahhh, ok |
17:31
🔗
|
xmc |
joepie91: we should use civil asset forfeiture against companies that are about to delete data |
17:32
🔗
|
xmc |
"sorry, that data might have involved a crime, hand it over" |
17:33
🔗
|
aaaaaaaaa |
US v. 2,000 hard drives of various sizes approximating 350 TB of data |
17:49
🔗
|
joepie91 |
hahaha |
23:06
🔗
|
APerti_ |
http://www.thesimm.org/temp/ff_x_redux.jpg |