[00:29] SketchCow: another twit podcast called fourcast: https://archive.org/search.php?query=subject%3A%22fourcast%22%20collection%3Agodaneinbox [00:49] Thanks [11:51] any special tags i should use for some random forum warc upload? [11:51] or are warc's automatically added some day [11:51] (great potential for abuse there :o ) [11:56] warc's are added if: [11:57] - Have "web" as mediatype [11:57] - Are in the "web" collection (or a subcollection from the "web" collection) [12:00] schbirid: iirc just upload them and tell sketchcow [12:00] :p [12:00] afaik the web collection isn't publicly uploadable [12:01] i'll give it a try tonight [12:01] thanks [12:34] I'm going to use the archive.org tag "dec31needs" for collections containing WARC & CDX files I want injected into the Wayback Machine. Please check it every so often, as these site crawls can help this little "collection" of yours. :P [12:37] Just do shit there and when you got plenty, come on and say it needs moving [12:38] No one is going to periodically do that for you. That only happens for godane, because he's a freaking monster at ingesting content [12:38] ie. seriously badass [12:40] I think he's still scared after the whole 'im going to kill everybody in #archiveteam' issue he had [12:41] Oh yeah, that was dec31 [12:42] yeah [12:42] Loonie cartoony. [12:44] Wait, scratch that. The tag's name will be "dec3199". If it has enough contents, why not inject it in the Wayback Machine? C'mon, you cowards. I might be your foe, but you can't hide from my helpful archives!!! >:D [12:45] dec31: come back to us when you actually have a few tens of files uploaded [12:49] Yeah, you're not godane. Just come back later when you have a lot of stuff in dec3199 or whatever you tag the stuff with. And remember to not be crazy and stuff. [12:49] oh he parted again [12:49] well fuck you dude [12:55] Don't worry, I'll make perfectly sure to not have insanity when I upload. I pop in & out to prevent bans. And yeah, it's the "dec3199" tag you'll be seeing from, ersi. [12:57] I know you're reading this though. [12:59] I'm curious to see him evade the bans. [13:03] probably going to use tor again [13:04] poor bugger [13:06] meh, i have no hard feelings for the guy, just a kid that went bezerk and should just do what he wants to do now. [13:07] I guess. He should dial down the crazy tone though [13:07] yeah [13:07] Pretty silly to try to prevent bans by popping in and out, from the same host though :D [13:08] that made me want to test him a little [13:08] he's probably reading this from another client that's in here, anyhow. As he answers stuff I said while he wasn't joined [13:08] or through http://badcheese.com/~steve/atlogs/?chan=archiveteam-bs&day=2014-10-17 [13:09] lol [13:10] this is the greatest tune ever http://spoomusic.com/a-zot/funkymuskrat_inphinity.mp3 [13:10] (that one was redundant) [13:10] yes, we are all jasonphiles here [13:11] Yeah, I just remembered that he goes by dec31somethingsomething so I made a more general one afterwards [13:11] Yup. You'll be seeing from me, alright! >:D And I'm also using that Warrior thing-a-magig of yours to help download sites in danger. But definitely not for that ugly bastard leader of yours. I also am tagging my completely innocent, formal, uninsane crawls under the "archiveteam" tag! MUHAHAHA! [13:11] dec31, you're not going to accomplish anything with this [13:11] people here are not going to respond to your silly trolling [13:12] if you join back and just be a nice guy, everything will be fine [13:12] this is the internet [13:12] random people say shitty things [13:12] and the day after, it's a new day [13:12] move on from your anger [13:12] and we can all live happily ever after [13:12] zomg ersi you cunt stop breaking my lines i hate you you so ugly [13:12] probaby forget about it in the next 10 minutes anyway [13:12] Heh, was a bit more people here than I initiallty thought. [13:13] There we go [13:13] not a fan of +m myself :\ [13:13] Enjoy joining and not saying anything, dec31 [13:15] heh [13:16] Ha-ha! *points* [13:16] But he has all the IPs in the wurld! [13:21] [15:11] Yup. You'll be seeing from me, alright! >:D And I'm also using that Warrior thing-a-magig of yours to help download sites in danger. But definitely not for that ugly bastard leader of yours. I also am tagging my completely innocent, formal, uninsane crawls under the "archiveteam" tag! MUHAHAHA! [13:21] so, basically, he's still doing archiveteam stuff while pretending not to be doing archiveteam stuff? [13:21] alright then [13:21] sounds like an okay deal to me [13:21] :p [13:24] Ha-ha! [13:25] Interesting that it takes about 10 minutes for him to switch relay. [13:25] Can't hear you cry. [13:31] i love weechat's smartfilter [13:33] You do know that you continue to look pretty immature and somewhat crazy, right? [13:34] Or rather, batshit insane. [13:37] Well, he's quiet at least. *snickers* [13:39] lol [13:39] btw dec3199 small tip [13:40] your warc doesnt seem to be complete afaik [13:40] oh wait, it seems to be [13:40] didnt see the warc file [13:42] lol, he joined quitpic just to inform well, im leaving. [13:53] how about we just pull a everett and send an abuse letter or two [13:54] pretty easy way to take out the trash [13:54] wp494: ? [13:56] IIRC he got pissed at a vps for assisting in the early efforts of archiving twitpic [13:56] so he sent an abuse letter [13:57] and then the offending node got terminated [13:57] abuse letters are a double-edged sword, so why not use the other edge in our favor [13:58] wp494: why did he get pissed about that? [13:58] who? [13:58] noah everett, the founder of twitpic [13:58] AKA public enemy #2 [13:58] #1 being yahoo [13:59] haha [14:01] wp494: everett genuinely abusemailed an archiving VPS? [14:01] * joepie91 puts on shitlist [14:01] does he have an ED article yet? [14:01] lol [14:06] wp494: panic bought out twitpic, right? [14:06] uh looks like it didn't work out [14:06] FYI, we're all fucked [14:06] .tw joepie91 [14:06] Sorry, couldn't get a tweet from https://twitter.com/joepie91?1413554812.7 (@joepie91) [14:06] ... [14:06] UPDATE: Itâs with a heavy heart that I announce again that Twitpic will be shutting down on October 25th. We worked through a handful of potential acquirers and exhausted all potential options. We were almost certain we had found a new home for Twitpic (hence our previous tweet), but agreeable terms could not be met. Normally we wouldnât announce something like that prematurely but we were hoping to let our users [14:06] know as soon as possible that Twitpic was living on. [14:07] .tw https://twitter.com/joepie91/status/523112387889860608 [14:07] Um, I think we're all fucked (again). hostapd_cli remote command execution issue [..] by attacker within radio range https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2014-3686 (@joepie91) [14:07] meh [14:07] careball [14:23] not using hostap [14:29] midas: wpa_supplicant [14:29] apparently mis-copypasted [14:29] also not using that [14:29] wpa_supplicant and hostapd: wpa_cli and hostapd_cli remote command execution issue [14:29] midas: you sure? [14:30] mac and linuxbox without wifi [14:30] right :P [14:30] (fwiw, if you use networkmanager and you have a wifi card, you use wpa_supplicant) [14:34] osx doesnt use wpa_supplicant and my linux boxes are all wired without wireless ;) [14:36] i'm not sure if anyone has actually looked at dec31's WARC in that collection, but it is probably tremendously incomplete [14:36] look at the warcinfo record [14:36] you'll see: [14:36] wget-arguments: "http://biology.arizona.edu/" "-m" "-e" "robots=off" "--warc-file=wwwbiologyarizonaedu-20141017" "--warc-cdx" "--continue" [14:38] --mirror might drag in page requisites but wget manpage doesn't state that [14:39] actually I guess it does drag in some GIFs [14:51] yipdw: afaik --mirror implicitly sets --page-req? [15:41] joepie91: wget manpage just says "currently equivalent to -r -N -l inf --no-remove-listing", I'm not sure if that implies -p [15:41] anyway one reason why archivebot exists is to forget about what all the switches do, so good job to dec3199 for doing what a program can do [15:44] :D [15:49] i wonder if dec3199919233 grabbed all the pages all by himself [15:49] took him long enough, probably whacked a load of tabs up in chrome and went through spamming ctrl-s, enter [16:45] wow, did a wget mirror to my ramdisk [16:45] 232K left [16:45] :) [16:45] i should pick some lottery numbers [16:46] haha [16:47] also http://www.newnownext.com/christmas-tree-accused-of-being-80-foot-tall-inflatable-butt-plug-in-paris/10/2014/ [16:47] I... what [16:47] just the URL alone [16:47] lol [16:49] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1fPM0KRcRc [17:23] does it make sense to run DOSBox inside a virtual machine? [17:43] Considering it's ported to almost every OS in the known universe and the source code is available -- kinda, not really, shannon. [17:47] It only makes sense if you're doing a bunch of post-setup arrangement. [17:47] I.e. if you create a virtual machine image that has DOSBOX along with a pile of materials, allowing you to use a menu system to interact with the large set, then it makes sense. [17:48] A "here's virtualbox GO" makes a lot less sense. [17:51] i want to run DOSBox inside another virtual machine so I can build a BBS and when i connect it to the internet it will not expose the host OS [17:51] that's my thinking [17:52] or i would just abandon that completely and use FreeDOS [17:52] seems reasonable [17:53] Why not just get a virtual instance somewhere for a nickel. [17:55] because i want it to be part of a network i am building at home [17:55] otherwise, i would just do that, pay someone a dollar a month [17:56] my goal is to learn things and re-experience the technology that was available when i first started online [17:56] "online" [17:56] now i dont have to go to the library to get a book about an OS or scour BBSes for software or beg people for diskettes ... [17:56] so i want to learn the things that were really hard for me then [17:57] basic networking [18:07] shannon: should be reasonable; doesn't seem different from e.g. running a JVM in a VM [18:08] dosbox has a GUI, not sure if you have to use it [18:08] "have" meaning "the program doesn't work any other way" [20:37] dosbox doesn't require using a gui. [20:38] It just makes changes for particular programs and games easier to manage. [20:43] http://vimeo.com/98092121 [20:56] Nice. I always wondered if the old scribes of the past would cry at the sight of modern printing presses and their ability to make knowledge so accessible to many. [23:07] just got view 1,000,000 http://twitpic.com/135xa [23:07] i SHOULD have played the lottery today