[00:50] http://data.london.gov.uk/dataset [02:16] If you've been having a bad day, cheer up- you (probably) didn't push out a driver update that purposefully bricked counterfeit copies of your chip [02:20] eh I call that a win [02:20] take that, bastards! [02:20] (sorry poor deluded people) [03:22] I feel like I'm getting short-tempered and/or there are more people showing up complaining about this [03:22] things [03:22] :( [03:26] probably both due to all the high profile stuff the past few months [03:28] you can only see the same complaint so many times before it gets to you [03:28] possibly [03:54] I don't really care about the services going offline, that's sort of a whatever [03:56] there just seems to be an expectation about archive team services that someone is maintaining and improving them as their full-time job and I really have no idea where that conception comes from [03:56] and it's frustrating as hell [03:56] People like to think that the Archive Team is some sort of well-funding organization I guess? [03:57] Rather than what it is, which is a bunch of volunteers with an IRC channel and a wiki. :) [03:57] I don't recall it being that way, and maybe that's when it was a smaller group and it was understood that these software tools had limitations, sharp edges, etc and people fixed them as they found time and motivation to do so [03:57] of course the usual disclaimer about romantization of the past applies [03:58] the other possibility, which is simpler and therefore probably more correct, is that I just really have to step away for a bit [03:59] (disclaimer, I'm not exactly a long-time participant, just this guy with a Warrior who decided maybe he should actually show up and possibly donate some meaningful after the TwitPic bs) [03:59] *meaningful effort [03:59] part could also be the archive.org and Archiveteam confusion [03:59] it's fine, this is just me trying to introspect [04:00] in #-bs [04:00] Dear Diary, ... [04:02] Does make me realize how much software has sort of become the modern voodoo with apps [04:02] https://m.xkcd.com/1425/ comes to mind [04:08] I wonder if you could somehow fashion reverse image searching into a way of identifying objects on the internet [04:08] *through the internet I should say [04:10] google has a reverse image search that can be startlingly accurate [04:13] it still falls down pretty hard if there's no exact match [05:22] joepie91: Yeah, I understood. In Sweden, it's same - but with an exception :) [05:59] boingboing'd [05:59] http://boingboing.net/2014/10/23/twitpic-to-vanish-taking-800.html [07:43] waiting to hear reports of riots in New York [07:48] ebola? [13:25] huh, does www.quake.de resolve for you guys? [13:27] A record is gone [13:27] without www still exists though [13:29] starting to upload NPR Morning Edition for 2002-01 [17:33] sup [17:33] TFGBD: ohai, let's continue here [17:33] #archiveteam is only for low-volume conversation, generally :) [17:33] i was going to tyr it in a ubuntu with colinux [17:34] should it matter if the os is 64bit ot 32bit? [17:34] I see :P [17:34] go with 64 bit if you have a choice [17:34] 32 bit does come with some limitations and I don't know the code you're using well enough to say whether it's going to be affected by those [17:34] Is there any way to get the web service to work on windows nt? [17:34] so best to just go with 64 bit [17:35] I have no clue, not a Windows user :) [17:35] I tried but it seems there is no procfile runner that works on windows [17:36] I'll try with ubuntu and see what happens [17:37] the online web service from archive.org ddoesn't work with 10gb files either [17:37] though, i get slightly larger files with that before it fails [17:38] i was told there is no fix for the web service but there is one for warctozip.py and thats what i applied [17:38] but it still didn't work [17:38] at least on winnt [17:38] cc yipdw [17:38] (I still read your nick as yip yip yip yip from that sesame street thing) [17:38] TFGBD: all I have is generic troubleshooting steps, really [17:39] ok so what WARC is this [17:39] specifically, try another huge file and see whether and how the result differs from the first one [17:39] URL please [17:39] from that you can often deduce details [17:52] is there any huge file fix for the service version [17:53] i'm not good with python [18:13] shrug, windows. That's cute. [18:15] TFGBD: So what's the problem you're encountering? That a WARC file is too big? [18:24] yeah [18:25] for warctozip.py on win32 python 2.7 [18:27] Yeah, you're gonna have a bad time with Windows. No one here uses Windows for any activities so nothing is tested on win [18:46] i assume cygwin or interix might work, though [18:47] i'm trying with ubuntu for now [18:52] If you're not all that savvy, I'd bet using either the pre-built warrior or installing ubuntu in a VM would work out the best [18:53] I have it setup up with colinux [18:53] Didn't feel like makinganother vm [18:54] It's a local install that cna also be booted in CoLinux [18:54] which is pretty neat [18:56] As long as it's not freaking Windows, hehe. [18:58] bt isn't the whole pont of using python to be cross platform [18:59] no [19:00] just because you can, doesn't mean you're forced to - thankfully [21:14] hmm... sf has a pumpkin fucking contest [21:15] I wonder how the judging works [21:16] https://twitter.com/docpop/status/525747233346846720 [21:16] nws-ish [21:24] I'm sure the judges work to very scientific rules. [21:32] halp appreciated: https://www.reddit.com/r/buildapcforme/comments/2k7u48/cheap_500_linux_system_primarily_for_development/ [21:36] joepie91: both monitors being VGA may be an issue. [21:36] Jonimus: I was just informed as such, regarding DVI-I vs DVI-D [21:36] the card in that currently posted build, however, seems suitable [21:37] as far as I can tell, it has 2 x DVI-I [21:37] and I'm okay with the specs I think [21:37] yeah that should work [21:37] the build that was posted there is generally okay, just the price and the case concern me, really [21:37] I'm also not sure that RAM is the most bang-for-the-buck option there is [21:38] and it concerns me that there's 0 noise level info there [21:39] you might be able to do 4x4GB for cheaper than the 2x8GB, but if you plan to upgrade later the 2x8GB is the better choice [21:44] Jonimus: I do plan to upgrade later, probably [21:44] I intend for this box to last at least 7-8 years :) [22:44] whoa- kernel 3.17 will have USB over IP- you can share locally attached USB devices [22:47] so you can share usb over local lan? [22:47] *usb hard drives [22:58] certainly sounds like it [22:58] http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_3.17 [22:59] if you'r looking for dope silkroadlrz.do.am [22:59] if you'r looking for dope silkroadlrz.do.am [23:02] cute [23:02] dashcloud: sounds like that's going to open a whole new can of 0days :)