#archiveteam-bs 2016-07-01,Fri

↑back Search

Time Nickname Message
00:08 🔗 JesseW has joined #archiveteam-bs
00:22 🔗 mr-b has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
00:27 🔗 ris has quit IRC ()
00:29 🔗 mr-b has joined #archiveteam-bs
00:58 🔗 BlueMaxim has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
00:59 🔗 DoomTay What time zone does Wayback Machine go off of? It's only 8:58 over here and Wayback Machine seems to think it's July 1st
01:01 🔗 DoomTay Hmm...guess it's UTC
01:02 🔗 j08nY has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
01:04 🔗 godane i'm at 733k items now
01:05 🔗 godane i'm up 4k from just 6 days ago
01:35 🔗 JesseW has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 370 seconds)
01:46 🔗 schbirid has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
01:57 🔗 DoomTay You know, I have a feeling that DeviantArt made an announcement of official closure, the window they would be given would be too small to crawl everything
02:00 🔗 schbirid has joined #archiveteam-bs
02:15 🔗 VADemon has quit IRC (left4dead)
02:22 🔗 wumpus DoomTay we have been chasing that robots.txt bug for a week now, sorry. We'll fix it eventually.
02:22 🔗 DoomTay Huh
02:24 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: on which note, I sent a robots.txt bug to info@, was that the most effective address to send it to? :P
02:25 🔗 wumpus vitzli I believe that yes, djvu is not expected to be the primary format for an uploaded item. My guess would be that converting to pdf before uploading is a good idea, and I'm not sure what you should do with the djvu, if it really is the primary document it should be uploaded... we aren't creating djvu anymore in derives, but to be safe(r) you might want to give it a different filename from the PDF.
02:25 🔗 wumpus and yes, Wayback is UTC.
02:25 🔗 wumpus joepie91 yes. Probably all that happened is that you're added to our list of testcases once we find the &#&$&@#@# bug
02:27 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: anything I can do to help locate the bug?
02:28 🔗 wumpus joepie91 no, test cases are about all you can do. It's something dumb in our code. Remember, redis is not the service, the freaking service is the service. (One of our daemons is putting bogus info in redis and we can't figure out which one.)
02:30 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: ah. well, I'll ask some people to forward testcases if they run into the bug, but aside from that, if you run into anything I can help with, let me know :P
02:30 🔗 joepie91 (debugging is half of my day job, heh)
02:48 🔗 wumpus I need a clue. I need to know a site which is (1) currently dead (2) has a LOT of content (recipes, fan fic, whatever) that is (3) SFW (4) interesting that (5) would probably attract a lot of traffic if it was indexed by Google. The BBC food site would count if it was dead, but it is not dead.
02:48 🔗 wumpus This is for a wayback experiment.
02:50 🔗 DoomTay Ooh, that's a good one
02:50 🔗 * joepie91 think
02:50 🔗 DoomTay Would an older incarnation of a currently living site count?
02:50 🔗 joepie91 DoomTay: then it'd compete in the google rankings, I'd imagine
02:51 🔗 DoomTay Ooh, there was an art site that used to exist, but the name escapes me
02:51 🔗 joepie91 (perhaps I'm guessing at the intent of the experiment a bit too much here :P)
02:52 🔗 wumpus joepie91 is guessing correctly
02:52 🔗 wumpus I don't want an angry site owner
02:53 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: the problem I'm seeing is that Google rankings are still fairly heavily influenced by linkbacks, and so even for interesting/popular content, you'd have trouble getting ranked high enough to attract a lot of traffic if you don't own the original domain... unless the content in question is also relatively rare or unique to find
02:53 🔗 joepie91 or unless the visitor is searching explicitly for that particular site
02:54 🔗 joepie91 recipes are relatively unique so that'd still make BBC Food a good candidate if it weren't alive
02:54 🔗 wumpus joepie91 you can leave the SEO to me.
02:54 🔗 wumpus (read my linkedin profile.)
02:54 🔗 BlueMaxim has joined #archiveteam-bs
02:54 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: I have no idea about what your non-IRC identity even is, realy :P
02:54 🔗 joepie91 really*
02:55 🔗 DoomTay CGHub.com?
02:56 🔗 joepie91 DoomTay: what am I looking at
02:56 🔗 joepie91 oh
02:56 🔗 joepie91 hold on!
02:56 🔗 DoomTay That's a stretch. It USED t obe a gallery site. Now it's used for conspiracy BS
02:56 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: something that offers game content, like maps?
02:56 🔗 joepie91 like, community-based game content sites
02:56 🔗 joepie91 relatively unique, can attract a bunch of content, are dying by the dozens
02:56 🔗 joepie91 er
02:56 🔗 joepie91 a bunch of traffic*
02:57 🔗 wumpus text content is best
02:57 🔗 joepie91 ah
02:57 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: the only other thing I can think of then, off the top of my head, is Q&A sites
02:57 🔗 joepie91 of the yahoo answers variety
02:57 🔗 wumpus or if the maps were well-described by the text on the pages, maybe that would work. The game would have to be current, tho.
02:57 🔗 joepie91 (though with slightly less crazy, usually)
02:57 🔗 wumpus yahoo answers, uh, yeah.
02:57 🔗 joepie91 that content is pretty timeless
02:58 🔗 wumpus "I'm pregnant, what's the most paracetamol can I take without killing my baby?"
02:58 🔗 joepie91 yeah... :P
02:58 🔗 joepie91 that seems like one of the more well-informed questions to be honest
02:58 🔗 joepie91 for yahoo answers
02:58 🔗 wumpus it was the one we used in our pitch deck. there are worse ones, but that one seemed realistic
02:59 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: so I went to the Yahoo Answers frontpage to see how alive it still was
02:59 🔗 joepie91 one of the top questions: "Should I forgive my boyfriend for killing my dog?"
02:59 🔗 DoomTay Okay, I'm pretty sure CGHub is the site I'm looking for in the first place. Just....don't go to the site as it is presently
02:59 🔗 joepie91 not much has changed :P
02:59 🔗 wumpus what's the last good date for cghub?
03:00 🔗 wumpus 1st cghub capture of the frontpage now shows a soft 404
03:00 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: how about http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Formspring ?
03:01 🔗 wumpus Hm, that may do. Let me play with it.
03:01 🔗 DoomTay Well, it closed April 13, 2014
03:03 🔗 wumpus I'll try cutting it at 5/8/13
03:04 🔗 wumpus fuck me it's affected by the robots.txt bug
03:08 🔗 joepie91 hah
03:08 🔗 joepie91 typical
03:10 🔗 DoomTay This seems to be a different situation. robots there is live and it blocks everything
03:13 🔗 wumpus oh wait, I misread it.
03:14 🔗 wumpus I guess they deleted all of their content, so why let anyone crawl them other than adsense
03:14 🔗 joepie91 <.<
03:15 🔗 DoomTay Assholes
03:17 🔗 wumpus ah well, looks like a lot of content.
03:19 🔗 JesseW has joined #archiveteam-bs
03:39 🔗 wyatt8740 has joined #archiveteam-bs
03:41 🔗 wyatt8740 sketchcow: web.archive.org claims my site has a robots.txt when a) there isn't one and b) there never has been one. http://wyatt8740.no-ip.org
03:41 🔗 wyatt8740 (my site's down atm and I'm trying to view the archive)
03:41 🔗 wyatt8740 https://web.archive.org/web/*/wyatt8740.no-ip.org
03:41 🔗 joepie91 cc wumpus
03:42 🔗 wyatt8740 ah wumpus is at archive.org too?
03:43 🔗 DoomTay I think they're aware of that bug
03:43 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: wumpus is currently trying to track down a robots.txt bug in the wayback, and needs more testcases, so maybe your issue relates to that as well
03:43 🔗 joepie91 :P
03:43 🔗 DoomTay Is it me or is your site currently dead?
03:43 🔗 wyatt8740 uts dead
03:43 🔗 wyatt8740 but I still have the subdomaim
03:43 🔗 DoomTay Sounds a lot like the same situation I'm faced with
03:43 🔗 wyatt8740 *subdomain
03:43 🔗 DoomTay Hope Wayback doesn't delete stuff in this kind of situation
03:44 🔗 wyatt8740 it doesnt
03:44 🔗 wyatt8740 but sketchcow (or someone else, I forget) won't tell me the backdoor that apparently exists :p
03:46 🔗 JesseW wyatt8740: wayback has 4 versions of your (non-existant) robots.txt file
03:47 🔗 wyatt8740 srsly?
03:47 🔗 wyatt8740 what's it say according to wayback
03:48 🔗 DoomTay https://web.archive.org/web/20150415000000*/http://wyatt8740.no-ip.org/robots.txt
03:48 🔗 JesseW they are all 404s
03:48 🔗 DoomTay So wyatt8740's point still stands
03:49 🔗 JesseW yep
03:50 🔗 JesseW amusingly, the only *visible* difference appears to be the version of Apache you were running.
03:50 🔗 DoomTay Was that from a manual scan or some diffing tool?
03:52 🔗 JesseW manual scan
03:52 🔗 wyatt8740 as in when I scanned in atari service manuals? or triggered archivebot/
03:53 🔗 wyatt8740 I have a warc but it's extremely inconvenient since there's no C program to unpack it and I don't have maven to compile the java tools
03:55 🔗 JesseW no, I mean I visually looked at the differences in what it gave back
03:56 🔗 wyatt8740 ohh
03:56 🔗 wyatt8740 (I'm on an android phone with a C toolchain and nothing else)
03:58 🔗 RavetcoFX has joined #archiveteam-bs
03:59 🔗 BlueMaxim has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
03:59 🔗 Frogging RavetcoFX: yeah I do like the archiving scene though. I've always been one to try and preserve things that were in danger of disappearing, even long before I found Archive Team
03:59 🔗 RavetcoFX Frogging: I've been archiving/hording a bit for last 4-5 years
04:00 🔗 RavetcoFX not to the extent you guys do though
04:00 🔗 JesseW RavetcoFX: glad to hear it -- please dump copies of what you have on IA if you can
04:00 🔗 JesseW (and *make* copies of stuff on IA you think is neat, if you have the space, also)
04:00 🔗 RavetcoFX here's my random garbage so far :o) https://archive.org/details/@ravetcofx
04:01 🔗 JesseW nice
04:02 🔗 RavetcoFX Frogging: if I remember correctly, you were one of the only others from Canada right?
04:02 🔗 wumpus wyatt8740 not the usual platform for manipulating warcs.
04:03 🔗 Frogging RavetcoFX: The only others?
04:03 🔗 Frogging I am from Canada though yes
04:03 🔗 wyatt8740 wumpus: I know. Still shocked there's no C program to do it yet
04:03 🔗 RavetcoFX Frogging: in mint-dev
04:04 🔗 Frogging ah yeah
04:04 🔗 JesseW wyatt8740: I mean, they are just plain text -- you could *write* one.
04:04 🔗 wyatt8740 Is binary encoded in base64 or something>
04:04 🔗 wyatt8740 ?
04:04 🔗 JesseW or hack something together with shell scripting
04:04 🔗 wumpus code it in C, it's not hard
04:04 🔗 Frogging on his phone? :p
04:05 🔗 JesseW wyatt8740: ah, fair point -- no, binary data is not encoded as anything, it's just there directly
04:05 🔗 wyatt8740 Again, are binaries in base64? also yeah I'd be writing a C program in GNU nano on my phone
04:05 🔗 Frogging do you have a physical keyboard at least :p
04:05 🔗 JesseW so if you wanted a particular payload, you just need to chop it out of the stream
04:05 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: WARC is a HTTP-like format
04:06 🔗 * Frogging hugs his BlackBerry PRIV
04:06 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: headers, double newline I believe, content length
04:06 🔗 joepie91 everything up to end of that content length is the record payload
04:06 🔗 joepie91 usually containing a HTTP request or response with its respective headers
04:06 🔗 joepie91 or DNS requests, in the case of heritrix
04:06 🔗 wyatt8740 I have absolutely no idea how HTTP works on the protocol level
04:06 🔗 wumpus there's an rfc ;-)
04:06 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: okay, so basically
04:06 🔗 joepie91 header\n
04:06 🔗 joepie91 header\n
04:06 🔗 wyatt8740 is it base64 for non-ascii?
04:06 🔗 joepie91 header\n
04:06 🔗 joepie91 \n
04:06 🔗 joepie91 payload here
04:06 🔗 joepie91 there's no base64 involved
04:06 🔗 RavetcoFX Frogging: what are your teams stance on archiving hard to obtain copyright material?
04:06 🔗 joepie91 it's literally just the payload itself
04:06 🔗 wyatt8740 ascii is 7 bit though
04:06 🔗 joepie91 content-length is used to determine where it starts and ends
04:06 🔗 Frogging RavetcoFX: archive first, ask questions later
04:06 🔗 wumpus you might see base64 in some headers but that's because they're arbitrary.
04:07 🔗 RavetcoFX Frogging: cool
04:07 🔗 yipdw I put base64 in headers just so people can ask if base64 is used in HTTP headers
04:07 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: honestly, just open a WARC in something like `less` and you'll see :P
04:07 🔗 joepie91 WARC is a very trivial format to recreate a parser for, even without a spec
04:07 🔗 wyatt8740 this WARC is 1gb
04:07 🔗 JesseW or zless if it is compressed :-)
04:07 🔗 joepie91 sure, less will read selectively
04:07 🔗 wyatt8740 I dont think nano will take that well
04:07 🔗 joepie91 hence, less
04:07 🔗 joepie91 not nano
04:07 🔗 joepie91 nano doesn't take anything well
04:08 🔗 joepie91 :P
04:08 🔗 Frogging haha
04:08 🔗 joepie91 you'll have no issues less'ing a 1GB WARC on a memory-constrained device though
04:08 🔗 wyatt8740 actually I got a bug fixed so it runs well on my IBM 3161 terminal
04:08 🔗 joepie91 also yeah, the gz might be a problem
04:08 🔗 joepie91 can always gzip -cd | head -n 1000
04:08 🔗 joepie91 or so
04:08 🔗 wyatt8740 I have busybox
04:08 🔗 wyatt8740 so yes
04:08 🔗 joepie91 and then pipe to less
04:08 🔗 wyatt8740 or zcat
04:09 🔗 joepie91 right, something that lets you `head`
04:09 🔗 joepie91 :P
04:09 🔗 wyatt8740 zcat file.warc.gz |less
04:09 🔗 joepie91 that will likely stream the entire file into RAM
04:09 🔗 joepie91 selectively reading the file only works if you specify a path to less
04:09 🔗 joepie91 not via stdin
04:09 🔗 JesseW anyone know of another domain without a robots.txt file, btw?
04:09 🔗 joepie91 iirc
04:09 🔗 wyatt8740 head -n 10;head -n 20; and so on. -_-
04:09 🔗 joepie91 yeah that'll work
04:09 🔗 joepie91 safe to say a thousand or so though
04:09 🔗 wumpus why are there 47 different python warc libraries?!
04:09 🔗 joepie91 JesseW: pdf.yt, HTTPS-only
04:09 🔗 wyatt8740 47 python warc libraries and zero in C
04:10 🔗 wyatt8740 it's depressing
04:10 🔗 JesseW wumpus: because, as we were just saying, it's really easy to write one :-)
04:10 🔗 joepie91 (custom error page but it correctly sends 404)
04:10 🔗 JesseW so lots and lots of people have
04:10 🔗 JesseW joepie91: ok, will check
04:10 🔗 joepie91 JesseW: mind, strict TLS settings
04:10 🔗 joepie91 old Java crap and WinXP will likely fail
04:10 🔗 wyatt8740 kids these days with their python and their JIT interpreted languages
04:10 🔗 joepie91 also HSTS
04:10 🔗 joepie91 :P
04:11 🔗 wyatt8740 I bet they don't even know what a segfault looks like
04:11 🔗 Frogging HSTS is annoying
04:11 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: oh trust me, Python devs know what segfaults look like
04:11 🔗 joepie91 lol
04:11 🔗 wyatt8740 and their object oriented language constructs spoiling them and confusing me :\
04:11 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: how so?
04:11 🔗 Frogging joepie91: if I want http:// then give it to me dammit!
04:11 🔗 Frogging :p
04:12 🔗 yipdw holy shit did I walk into #fsf by accident
04:12 🔗 wumpus frogging is a dinosaur. https is the way forward.
04:12 🔗 joepie91 don't see why I would
04:12 🔗 joepie91 there's a very good reason HSTS is a thing
04:12 🔗 JesseW hm, well pdf.yt isn't blocked on wayback, even though it gives a 404 for robots.txt
04:12 🔗 Frogging it probably isn't as good of a reason as you think it is
04:12 🔗 wyatt8740 yipdw: do they share my dislike of high level programming and OOP?
04:12 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: are you _sure_ you want to have this discussion? :)
04:12 🔗 Frogging i'm thinking I don't actually :p
04:13 🔗 DoomTay JesseW: Are we still looking for the "currently dead" requirement?
04:13 🔗 yipdw they share a tendency for polarization yeah
04:13 🔗 RavetcoFX I do worry of what could happen to the Internet Archive though :/
04:13 🔗 Frogging yeah it's quite a SPOF RavetcoFX
04:13 🔗 wyatt8740 (I should warn you I'm the type that uses goto to annoy teachers in programming assignments)
04:13 🔗 Frogging RavetcoFX: we have this though fwiw http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=INTERNETARCHIVE.BAK
04:13 🔗 JesseW RavetcoFX: have you heard of http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=INTERNETARCHIVE.BAK ?
04:13 🔗 Frogging lol
04:13 🔗 wumpus hence the decentralizedweb summit that we recently had, but I digress
04:14 🔗 * JesseW ah, ninja'ed
04:14 🔗 Stiletto that actually sounds similar to something I came across recently. balrog helped me archive a site last year, now archive.org is claiming robots.txt issue. No server is currently answering the domain, though we own the domain still. Domain hosted by GoDaddy. :-/
04:14 🔗 wumpus yes, the bug is related to sites which time out.
04:14 🔗 wyatt8740 stiletto: join the club
04:14 🔗 Frogging joepie91: I use plaintext IRC because fuck the SSL police
04:14 🔗 JesseW hm, interesting
04:14 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: fwiw, I'm not somebody who blindly shouts "everything must be TLS 100% of the time right now without exceptions": http://cryto.net/~joepie91/blog/2015/05/01/on-mozillas-forced-ssl/
04:14 🔗 * Stiletto joins club
04:14 🔗 wyatt8740 my server's dead but the domain's still in my control
04:14 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: but essentially all of the anti-TLS arguments that don't pertain to the CA model are outright wrong
04:15 🔗 DoomTay wumpus: have you looked at foxbox.tv? Another potential use case, I think
04:15 🔗 wyatt8740 forcing SSL will kill people like me that can't pay people to "trust" then
04:15 🔗 wyatt8740 them*
04:15 🔗 joepie91 so I'm very, -very- skeptical of people demanding plaintext connections
04:15 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: and that would be the CA model
04:15 🔗 joepie91 and that's precisely the issue
04:15 🔗 joepie91 and why it shouldn;t be enforced on a browser level (yet)
04:15 🔗 joepie91 but that doesn't mean that it shouldn't be enforced on a *server* level
04:15 🔗 wyatt8740 I self sign
04:16 🔗 wyatt8740 :\
04:16 🔗 Frogging joepie91: because the wikipedia page I'm loading can be loaded by anyone and there is no reason to protect its content in transit
04:16 🔗 joepie91 which is a separate discussion entirely
04:16 🔗 wumpus woah
04:16 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: just use let's encrypt then?
04:16 🔗 wumpus just because you want bad data, frogging, doesn't mean anyone else should
04:16 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: yeah, no, that's not even remotely correct and shows a complete misunderstanding of what TLS is *for*
04:16 🔗 wyatt8740 Indo not know what "let's encrypt" is
04:16 🔗 pikhq wyatt8740: Why don't you use Let's Encrypt these days? It's definitely an improvement over self signing.
04:16 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: hold on, I will explain in a bit
04:16 🔗 pikhq https://letsencrypt.org/
04:16 🔗 joepie91 this is not going to mix well with a discussion about what TLS is for
04:16 🔗 Frogging wumpus: I didn't say anyone else should
04:16 🔗 joepie91 :p
04:17 🔗 * pikhq holds off on everything else
04:17 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: the problem is that you didn't argue why you want HTTP. you argued why you don't think you need HTTPS.
04:17 🔗 joepie91 that's an entirely different discussion
04:17 🔗 wumpus frogging: you will learn I am not a fan of 1-offs ;-)
04:17 🔗 JesseW wumpus: so the bug isn't triggered by the statuscode, but rather by a timeout when making the connection?
04:17 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) "free certificate that automatically renews itself"
04:17 🔗 Frogging joepie91: what's it for then, if not to um... encrypt things
04:17 🔗 wumpus jessew: yes.
04:17 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: encrypting things is just the means, not the goal.
04:17 🔗 joepie91 part of the means, in fact
04:17 🔗 joepie91 authentication is another part of that
04:17 🔗 Frogging oh dear, what's the goal
04:17 🔗 wyatt8740 does lets encrypt have backing from major browsers yet?
04:17 🔗 yipdw wyatt8740: yes
04:17 🔗 wyatt8740 I use seamonkey so Mozilla'd probably have to adopt it
04:17 🔗 JesseW wumpus: and that fact isn't stored in the (public) parts of the cdx, right?
04:18 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) mozilla is founding member
04:18 🔗 wumpus jessew: this is a bug in a redis cache.
04:18 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: the goal of TLS is two-fold: 1) preventing passive attackers 'on the wire' from seeing your traffic and deducing information from that about you, your habits, interests, position, relationships, and so on. 2) preventing active attackers from pretending to be the server and the client (MITM attack) and thus circumventing 1
04:18 🔗 Stiletto BTW: any work towards a facebook-dl equiv of youtube-dl that archivebot can use, or something? Getting ready to kill off a page and knowing that archive.org preserved the entire thing would be cool :)
04:18 🔗 yipdw Stiletto: no
04:18 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: it's primarily about privacy, not secrecy
04:18 🔗 pikhq wyatt8740: All of 'em. Cross-signed by an already adopted CA, so it works in all browsers including fairly old versions of IE (IE 6 SP3, IIRC).
04:18 🔗 wyatt8740 that said I bet seamonkey gets killed off when mozilla puts a machine gun to its foot and removes XUL
04:18 🔗 joepie91 it's just that privacy helps with secrecy
04:19 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: so the public availability of wikipedia is irrelevant, because that's a secrecy argument, not a privacy argument
04:19 🔗 joepie91 the data you're protecting isn't the wikipedia content
04:19 🔗 Stiletto @yipdw :( well i understand how it could be challenging
04:19 🔗 joepie91 it's the fact that you're *looking* at it
04:19 🔗 Frogging I see
04:19 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) that's happening right now; they're moving away from XUL already. e10s requires it
04:19 🔗 pikhq Frogging: Additionally, it prevents any outside party from falsely *claiming* to be Wikipedia.
04:19 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: this is also why the rationale of a lot of website operators - "I don't think my site is sensitive so it doesn't need TLS" is wrong - this is simply not a consideration that you can make for your users
04:19 🔗 JesseW wumpus: wow -- I wouldn't have expected that would have an effect like this. I'll be very curious to read whatever public or semi-public writeup gets made when the bug is figured out.
04:19 🔗 wumpus frogging: not only do I not want my ISP spying on me, I want them to not spy on my friends, too.
04:19 🔗 wyatt8740 aranje: not for seamonley
04:19 🔗 wyatt8740 seamonkey*
04:20 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) yes, I mean firefox, but I'm not aware that mozilla even works on seamonkey much anymore
04:20 🔗 wyatt8740 also say goodbye to total customizability :\
04:20 🔗 wumpus jessew: it's a garden-variety bug, we stupidly have multiple codebases talking to the same cache and one of them has a bug, we aren't sure which.
04:20 🔗 wumpus jessew: and the fix is DON'T DO THAT YOU FOOLS
04:20 🔗 wyatt8740 It's mostly done by a small group of insane people like me that think chrome is the worst thing to ever happen to GUI design
04:20 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: in the end, it comes down to what the *user* wants to keep private, and to that end, there must always be a possibility for encryption. further, to make this work on an internet-wide basis, it needs to be the *default*, because otherwise people will either fuck up or not care enough, often because they haven't really considered the consequences of not keeping this information private
04:20 🔗 RavetcoFX when it's financially feasible one day, I'd love to help fund some kind of long term archival project, like burying a few hundred PB on the moon
04:21 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) heh
04:21 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: unfortunately the CA model gets into the way of that "must always be a possibility", but it's slowly improving
04:21 🔗 JesseW wumpus: lol
04:21 🔗 pikhq Frogging: I will note, of course, that it actually prevents anyone who's not a CA or in cahoots with a CA from doing that, not prevents it entirely.
04:21 🔗 joepie91 in the way*
04:21 🔗 pikhq Buuut that's at least a limitation.
04:21 🔗 RavetcoFX or even shooting an archive out of the solar system
04:21 🔗 wumpus jessew: redis is not a service. the service is the service.
04:21 🔗 wumpus ravetcofx already done, voyager 1 and 2
04:21 🔗 DoomTay What good is an archive if you can't get to it?
04:22 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: now a lot of people think that TLS will be a burden resource-wise, but that hasn't really been true for a while now
04:22 🔗 joepie91 not to a point that it matters
04:22 🔗 RavetcoFX wumpus: only a small sample of humanity on the vinyl
04:22 🔗 JesseW DoomTay: other people can get to it later, even if you can't
04:22 🔗 joepie91 integration is now also readily available for almost all software, so that's usually not an argument anymore either
04:22 🔗 yipdw the third secret goal of TLS is awesome error messages
04:22 🔗 pikhq Google increased load by about 1% in their servers by turning it on, IIRC.
04:22 🔗 wumpus note that the usual librarian definion of archive is not about access.
04:22 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: so in summary: TLS is essentially free for the user, we want it to be enabled by default, there are clear privacy benefits, and not really any real-world drawbacks anymore.
04:22 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: and from that perspective, "give me HTTP if I want HTTP" makes no sense
04:23 🔗 wyatt8740 aranje thus my browser looks like netscape communicator in 2016 (bookmarks bar collapsed) http://i.imgur.com/zsYmHsx.png
04:23 🔗 joepie91 and it makes much more sense to ensure that every client will always use HTTPS regardless of any downgrade attacks that might occur on their network
04:23 🔗 Frogging maybe I don't care about my privacy
04:23 🔗 Frogging maybe I'm crazy and want to destroy it
04:23 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: sure, but that's irrelevant
04:23 🔗 wumpus frogging: we don't care that you don't care ;-)
04:23 🔗 RavetcoFX DoomTay: an archive for distant ancestors to find I suppose?
04:23 🔗 joepie91 if you're crazy then I shouldn't let you make decisions ;)
04:23 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) hehehe that's a hilarious look :>
04:23 🔗 wyatt8740 I love it.
04:23 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: and you can always voluntarily publish your browsing history
04:23 🔗 joepie91 if you intend on destroying your privacy
04:23 🔗 joepie91 several people have done so
04:24 🔗 joepie91 (to make a point, primarily)
04:24 🔗 wyatt8740 It works and DOESN'T CHANGE EVERYTHING with each update
04:24 🔗 Aranje and I recommend you use tls for that copy of your browsing history, so somebody doesn't insert fake pages
04:24 🔗 pikhq wyatt8740: If you don't have it already: Let's Encrypt is free secure certs, forever, for everyone, that are accepted in all relevant TLS users. And it's easy to set up as well.
04:24 🔗 joepie91 Aranje: that's an interesting threat model :P
04:24 🔗 Aranje joepie91:) :D
04:24 🔗 JesseW Frogging: then make a proxy that accepts HTTPS and outputs HTTP, and put that as far away (network wise) from you as you can gt
04:24 🔗 wyatt8740 Seamonkey follows the principle of least astonishment
04:24 🔗 pikhq wyatt8740: So there's essentially no reason to use self-signed certs anymore.
04:25 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: okay, so to get back to Let's Encrypt, now that the "what is TLS for" thing has been covered... Let's Encrypt is a CA that gives out free domain-validated certificates, that are considered valid by browsers, in an automated manner.
04:25 🔗 joepie91 pikhq: there are a few
04:25 🔗 joepie91 but not any that wyatt8740 is likely to encounter
04:25 🔗 wyatt8740 pikhq: okay except maybe I want to scare off people who use HTYPS
04:25 🔗 wyatt8740 HTTPS
04:25 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) nothing in chrome changes from version to version because there's no UI to change :D
04:25 🔗 wyatt8740 aranje: mainly referring to firefox transforming more and more into chrome each release
04:25 🔗 pikhq joepie91: Well, sure. Things like "not on the public Internet at all" or "using it in a closed system with only one key trusted" or the like.
04:25 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: anyway, if you want automagical browser-valid TLS that takes you 0 effort to configure, there's even things like Caddy - a HTTPd that, for every hostname you configure, *automatically* obtains and periodically renews a Let's Encrypt certificate, sets it up, and so on
04:26 🔗 Aranje joepie91:) side question: do you think the kazakh government's legal requirement of a root cert on every browser for tls stripping is a CA model failure or
04:26 🔗 joepie91 pikhq: also wildcard scenarios, API servers, etc
04:26 🔗 pikhq Right, yes.
04:26 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) oh, haha, indeed
04:26 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: ref https://caddyserver.com/
04:26 🔗 wyatt8740 'we have deprecated everything our user base stayed with us for so we could become chrome which other users like' - mozilla
04:26 🔗 pikhq But not for the common case of "I want a secure website". There, Let's Encrypt is better and easier.
04:26 🔗 joepie91 Aranje: I wouldn't consider that a CA model failure, no
04:26 🔗 joepie91 that's essentially just a client compromise
04:27 🔗 joepie91 by legal means
04:27 🔗 Aranje wyatt8740:) they also helped standardize addons to be cross browser and are finally going to have the capacity to sandbox the browser
04:27 🔗 joepie91 could've happened for any auth model
04:27 🔗 Aranje joepie91:) heh, alright
04:27 🔗 wyatt8740 However they destroyed customizabiluty
04:27 🔗 wyatt8740 *customizability
04:27 🔗 yipdw changes topic to: Archive Team: Oh Yeah, Negotiation is the Answer | <SketchCow> Shut Up | Strike Up A Conversation With These Three Amazing Letters
04:27 🔗 wyatt8740 since sandboxing and 100% configurability are mutually incompatible
04:27 🔗 Aranje aye
04:27 🔗 joepie91 Aranje: now if kazakh CAs were coerced to sign certificates for third-party sites when they are served within kazakhstan using MITM, then -that- is what I would consider a CA model failure
04:27 🔗 joepie91 but also likely a very short-lived one
04:28 🔗 joepie91 that doesn't really work at scale, tends to get you noticed
04:28 🔗 joepie91 :P
04:28 🔗 RavetcoFX has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed)
04:28 🔗 JesseW wyatt8740: why are those incompatible?
04:28 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: anyway, anything unclear about LE, or? :P
04:28 🔗 Aranje joepie91:) yeah I don't know what the super detailed specifics of their legal requirements are, I just saw in passing that they asked for inclusion into the root store because kazakh law requires ssl stripping ability. browsers are notably reticent
04:28 🔗 wyatt8740 jesseW: look at something like downthemall.
04:28 🔗 wumpus what's this +t bullshit? the topic would be more interesting if I could set it.
04:29 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: I think that's precisely why the +t is there ;)
04:29 🔗 Aranje wumpus:) you don't have operator
04:29 🔗 wyatt8740 they can add special javascript functions to allow that particular adon to adapt, but a download accelerator is simply one of infinite use cases
04:29 🔗 Aranje you need +h or +o to edit topic
04:29 🔗 wumpus aranje I am the wumpus who formed EFNET. I am aware of how irc works.
04:29 🔗 wumpus the code is GPL because of me.
04:30 🔗 wumpus (server)
04:30 🔗 * JesseW is actually rather surprised to see wumpus breaking his no-EFNET rule...
04:30 🔗 wumpus and I'm the guy who mis-designed kick and ban.
04:30 🔗 Aranje wumpus:) excellent, I would have no idea about that since it's 10 years before I had an internet connection
04:30 🔗 wumpus yeah yeah rules are made to be broken, more than a decade later
04:30 🔗 wumpus more than 2 decades, sheesh
04:31 🔗 wyatt8740 Unless you can arbitrarily inject code into any point of the browser userspace you're going to meet things you can't do in the new model.
04:31 🔗 wyatt8740 wumpus: gonna say thanks for efnet then
04:31 🔗 joepie91 no-EFNET rule?
04:31 🔗 Aranje oh, founded 1990
04:31 🔗 wumpus Hi, my name's Greg and I'm an IRC addict.
04:31 🔗 Aranje okay, 15 years before internet
04:31 🔗 wumpus WHAT
04:31 🔗 joepie91 lol
04:31 🔗 wumpus oh, just your internet.
04:31 🔗 Aranje I did not have internet until 2005
04:31 🔗 wyatt8740 26 years old if 1990
04:32 🔗 wyatt8740 I'm 19 years old:\
04:32 🔗 Aranje :)
04:32 🔗 wumpus The Intenet didn't exist in 1990, I was on NSFNet
04:32 🔗 wyatt8740 (late 1996)
04:32 🔗 wyatt8740 BBSes existed though right
04:32 🔗 Aranje I'll leave the internet vs web out on thetable
04:32 🔗 wyatt8740 usenet
04:32 🔗 JesseW wyatt8740: well, until the inclusion of things like EME, you can still build a custom browser, no?
04:33 🔗 wyatt8740 not entirely
04:33 🔗 wumpus wyatt8740 before the internet, we had interconnected networks with the same tech that just weren't named "the internet"
04:33 🔗 ravetcofx has joined #archiveteam-bs
04:33 🔗 Frogging [00:33:31] <JesseW> [00:24:37] Frogging: then make a proxy that accepts HTTPS and outputs HTTP, and put that as far away (network wise) from you as you can gt
04:33 🔗 wyatt8740 If they remove XUL entirely then the cross platform UI design idea will be gone
04:33 🔗 Frogging good idea :v
04:34 🔗 Frogging wow double timestamp
04:34 🔗 yipdw I injected it into your packets
04:34 🔗 wyatt8740 wumpus: so you mean the 'world wide web'?
04:35 🔗 JesseW Frogging: it's the sensible way to give entertainment to your ISP
04:35 🔗 wyatt8740 I'm gonna miss XUL a lot.
04:35 🔗 * joepie91 lost faith in Mozilla a good while ago
04:35 🔗 * wyatt8740 uses SeaMonkey after losing faith in mozilla proper but hating chrome and what it stands for
04:35 🔗 Frogging remember when they changed the .bro file extension because some keyboard warriors complained
04:35 🔗 Aranje I'm stoked on writing the entire UI in js/html/canvas
04:36 🔗 Frogging about "rape culture" or something
04:36 🔗 wyatt8740 (also chrome can't use APNGs still)
04:36 🔗 Aranje cause realistically that's what it'll end up
04:36 🔗 * wumpus finds that mozilla is the best initial organization for Internet Archive to work with to integrate the Wayback into all browsers
04:36 🔗 joepie91 regardless, their organizational direction has been disappointing to say the least
04:36 🔗 * Aranje nods
04:36 🔗 Aranje wayback all the things ++
04:36 🔗 wyatt8740 especially past 2009
04:37 🔗 DoomTay Wait, how?
04:37 🔗 joepie91 they most certainly don't fit into the "community project" category anymore
04:37 🔗 * wumpus used to like puerile jokes when he was 14
04:37 🔗 DoomTay I mean, how would a browser "integrate" Wayback?
04:37 🔗 wumpus whenever you get a 404 or soft 404, hit the wayback
04:37 🔗 joepie91 and I still haven't forgiven them for their tonedeaf advertising tiles bullshit (and subsequent feel-good marketing blather on the blog_ either
04:37 🔗 joepie91 )*
04:37 🔗 Frogging sounds like IA server suicide :p
04:37 🔗 wyatt8740 I wish I could go back to 2009 and get them to stop changing shit and show them how frustrated their user base is now
04:37 🔗 wumpus we'll have to buy some new servers.
04:38 🔗 * Frogging ups his donation
04:38 🔗 wyatt8740 ^
04:38 🔗 Aranje I'd put an advanced option to have a date scroller like the current wayback header so you can slide back in history of the page you're on
04:38 🔗 wyatt8740 I'd suggest a button "view this site on the Wayback Machine"
04:38 🔗 Frogging i may be crazy but I still donate to good causes :p
04:38 🔗 DoomTay I think there's an addon that does that kind of thing
04:38 🔗 Aranje yeah that's the easy/safest
04:38 🔗 joepie91 or the killing off of FirefoxOS for being "not commercially successful"
04:38 🔗 wyatt8740 rather than automatic redirect
04:38 🔗 DoomTay I thought htey arlready killed that off
04:38 🔗 joepie91 which is pretty much the opposite of what Mozilla was originally founded for
04:39 🔗 wyatt8740 Whoa, when'd they kill firefoxOS
04:39 🔗 Frogging >commercial success
04:39 🔗 Frogging >non profit
04:39 🔗 joepie91 or their blind "let's require TLS for everything" while completely ignoring the real-world concerns with that
04:39 🔗 Aranje well and it's even weirder because they announced its death but appear to continue working on it
04:39 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: yeah, precisely
04:39 🔗 wyatt8740 I thought some panasonic TVs used firefoxOS
04:39 🔗 joepie91 they seem to have just started ignoring their userbase completely
04:39 🔗 Frogging oh and the plugins thing
04:39 🔗 DoomTay Hmm...it seems they just stopped selling FirefoxOS phones
04:39 🔗 wyatt8740 (all my TVs are old CRT broadcast monitors so IDK)
04:39 🔗 joepie91 and effectively act as a commercial corporation now, from an organizational perspective
04:40 🔗 joepie91 DoomTay: they announced ceasing development, then un-announced it, then announced it again
04:40 🔗 joepie91 with some drivel about IoT applications
04:40 🔗 joepie91 which has precisely nothing to do with what drove the team behind Firefox OS
04:40 🔗 joepie91 and for all intents and purposes, is a separate project entirely
04:40 🔗 Aranje though tbh iot on rust stuffs would probably be awesome
04:41 🔗 wyatt8740 the forcing extensions to be signed by mozilla with no about:config option to say "let me do what the fuck I want to" is what made me givenup entirely on mozilla
04:41 🔗 Aranje and by awesome I mean deterministically crashy
04:41 🔗 Frogging IoT anything is not awesome. It's a security nightmare
04:42 🔗 DoomTay It makes developing addons you're only going to use for yourself is a lot harder wit hthat, I'll admit
04:42 🔗 joepie91 honestly, the moment an organization starts using dark patterns in their design, that's pretty much a death sentence
04:42 🔗 joepie91 from a 'community project' perspective
04:42 🔗 Aranje I will mostly defend mozilla's decisions re: user safety. they're following chrome's footsteps for sure, but the internet's fucking retarded if you don't know how a computer works at this point. and so they have to handle that for the user.
04:42 🔗 joepie91 and Mozilla has gotten beyond that point
04:42 🔗 joepie91 Aranje: that argues for defaults, not removal of a feature
04:42 🔗 joepie91 I'm fine with defaulting to signed-only
04:42 🔗 yipdw who really knows how a computer works at this point
04:42 🔗 wyatt8740 so I'm hanging onto seamonkey for dear life and bracing for impact when they remove XUL from gecko instead of building it with '--without-xul'
04:42 🔗 joepie91 I'm not fine with removing the ability to opt in to unsigned thbings
04:42 🔗 joepie91 things*
04:42 🔗 Frogging yipdw: no single person that's for sure
04:43 🔗 wyatt8740 yipdw: I know how a computer works. But not all the proprietary bullshit in a _new_ computer
04:43 🔗 wyatt8740 give me a VIC-20 and I can tell you though
04:43 🔗 Aranje yeah what exactly does an ime do
04:43 🔗 Frogging Aranje: not even Intel knows
04:43 🔗 Frogging :p
04:43 🔗 Aranje :D
04:43 🔗 Aranje I'll take 3, then
04:44 🔗 Aranje layer the backdoors on top of eachother
04:44 🔗 wyatt8740 intel management engine(tm) is a proprietary driver that does magical things
04:44 🔗 Aranje I actually know the answer to my own question
04:44 🔗 Aranje lol
04:44 🔗 Frogging I heard some scary things about it. I doubt Intel would be stupid enough to put something on ALL their CPUs that listens to the network
04:44 🔗 joepie91 isn't that precisely what they did
04:44 🔗 joepie91 lol
04:44 🔗 Aranje the thing that freaks people out about it is the capacity for remote contact
04:44 🔗 wyatt8740 Yep
04:44 🔗 joepie91 like, literally
04:44 🔗 joepie91 word for word
04:44 🔗 Aranje yes
04:45 🔗 wyatt8740 Yep
04:45 🔗 Aranje it's actually the point
04:45 🔗 Frogging joepie91: well that's what people said they did.. It just seems so counter-intuitive to me
04:45 🔗 Aranje remote attestation is the feature, if you wanna google
04:45 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: why?
04:45 🔗 Frogging it'd be an existence-ending disaster for them if it fucked up
04:45 🔗 wyatt8740 So tragically my Netburst Xeon IBM server is my mewest hardware I can mostly trust
04:45 🔗 Frogging why would they take that risk
04:45 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: they have an effective duopoly on x86
04:45 🔗 yipdw I heard it uses nanomachines
04:45 🔗 joepie91 and a monopoly on highly-performant x86
04:45 🔗 wyatt8740 *newest
04:45 🔗 wumpus is there an irc channel about archiveteam which is NOT populated with people second-guessing firefox management?
04:46 🔗 joepie91 they can do pretty much whatever the hell they want and get away with it
04:46 🔗 Aranje wumpus:) heh
04:46 🔗 Frogging joepie91: I'm aware but if someone cracked it then they would die quickly
04:46 🔗 JesseW wumpus: #urlteam is quiet :-)
04:46 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: nope, it won't end their existence
04:46 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: it probably wouldn't
04:46 🔗 wyatt8740 wumpus #archiveteam Proper?
04:46 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: you have to understand that x86 is riddled in patents and other bullshit
04:46 🔗 joepie91 there are essentially no competitors to Intel
04:46 🔗 DoomTay And here I was thinking off-topic stuff wasn't tolerated
04:46 🔗 joepie91 and never can be unless AMD shapes up
04:46 🔗 Frogging it would if suddenly every x86 processor they made was insecure, nobody would trust them
04:46 🔗 wyatt8740 joepie:x'the 8086 is out of the patent period
04:46 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: and what would their alternative be?
04:47 🔗 JesseW DoomTay: this is *why* it isn't tolerated :-P
04:47 🔗 Aranje AMD has a similar feature these days, though I forget the name
04:47 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: I'm talking about all the bits and pieces of design involved in developing an efficient x86 proc
04:47 🔗 Frogging joepie91: literally anything that doesn't have a giant hole in it
04:47 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: like?
04:47 🔗 Frogging AMD?
04:47 🔗 wyatt8740 also my NEC V20 is 8088 compatible :)
04:47 🔗 Frogging (before you mention PSP, that's a different thing)
04:47 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: have you checked their benchmarks lately?
04:47 🔗 Aranje joepie91:) the one coming out this fall will be nice, but it's the first competitive one in 10 years
04:47 🔗 joepie91 they've been lagging behind on power:performance for the past 5 years or so
04:47 🔗 joepie91 if not more
04:48 🔗 joepie91 lagging behind far enough that realistically, they're not a mainstream alternative
04:48 🔗 Frogging joepie91: I think all their enterprise customers would take that over something totally broken
04:48 🔗 JesseW wumpus: I think we've moved on to second-guessing Intel's management now :-)
04:48 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: I doubt it
04:48 🔗 wyatt8740 joepie: keyword being 'efficient'?
04:48 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: enterprise will just put a firewall around it
04:48 🔗 joepie91 ie. how all the other 'security issues' are resolved
04:48 🔗 joepie91 because it's cheaper
04:48 🔗 wumpus I tell you, this would be funnier if I could set channel topics.
04:48 🔗 yipdw sets mode: +o wumpus
04:48 🔗 joepie91 heh
04:48 🔗 wyatt8740 do eeeet
04:48 🔗 wumpus sweet zombie jeebus
04:48 🔗 Frogging lmao
04:48 🔗 Aranje wumpus:) fix it
04:49 🔗 wumpus changes topic to: Wumpus is in charge. No more SketchCow!
04:49 🔗 joepie91 round 1... fight!
04:49 🔗 * bwn popcorn
04:49 🔗 joepie91 :P
04:49 🔗 wumpus he's not even present, not much of a fight.
04:49 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: isn't that how all of history's victors won
04:49 🔗 joepie91 basically
04:49 🔗 wumpus OMG my first channel oper in 20 years
04:49 🔗 joepie91 picking the right moment for an unfair fight
04:49 🔗 Frogging hitler was AFK
04:49 🔗 Aranje people at wrong spot
04:49 🔗 Aranje lol
04:50 🔗 wyatt8740 godwin's law
04:50 🔗 Frogging wyatt8740: yass
04:50 🔗 wumpus I wonder if they ever fixed ban...
04:50 🔗 * joepie91 has a bad feeling about this
04:50 🔗 joepie91 :P
04:51 🔗 wyatt8740 I get randomly banned from prison.net upon login sometimes for no reason
04:51 🔗 wyatt8740 so I dont think so
04:51 🔗 wumpus sets mode: +b *?*?*?*DO!*@*
04:51 🔗 wumpus not fixed
04:51 🔗 wumpus jesus
04:51 🔗 wyatt8740 lol
04:51 🔗 wumpus 20 years nobody fixed that fucking bug
04:51 🔗 Aranje lol
04:51 🔗 Sk1d has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
04:51 🔗 wumpus sets mode: -b *?*?*?*DO!*@*
04:51 🔗 wyatt8740 what did you type to get that?
04:51 🔗 wyatt8740 what's the buf
04:51 🔗 Frogging what the hell
04:52 🔗 wyatt8740 *bug
04:52 🔗 wumpus I forgot about the length limit!
04:52 🔗 wumpus mode #archiveteam-bs +b *?**?**?**DOESNOTMATCHANYONE
04:52 🔗 wyatt8740 heh
04:52 🔗 wumpus oh, that's the fix
04:52 🔗 wumpus stupid
04:52 🔗 joepie91 LOL
04:52 🔗 wumpus I was going to just reduce the regular expression
04:52 🔗 wyatt8740 my username==length limit
04:52 🔗 Frogging now overflow the buffer
04:52 🔗 Frogging perform hax
04:52 🔗 wumpus omg that's a dangerous way to fix it
04:52 🔗 wyatt8740 9n0 chars
04:52 🔗 wyatt8740 9*
04:53 🔗 Aranje lol
04:53 🔗 Aranje welcome to 2016
04:53 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: I feel like basically everything you've said for the past 5 minutes perfectly illustrates efnet
04:53 🔗 joepie91 :P
04:53 🔗 wumpus RESPECT MAH AUTHORIATAE
04:53 🔗 Frogging the wild west of IRC
04:53 🔗 wumpus I'm just glad that the doucebag squatting on my nick doesn't come on efnet anymore
04:53 🔗 wyatt8740 are two-byte characters treated as one for nicks?
04:54 🔗 wumpus irc predates utf8 by a long time
04:54 🔗 wyatt8740 so you mean 'no'
04:54 🔗 wyatt8740 :p
04:54 🔗 wumpus I'm saying, if they implemented it they fucked it up
04:55 🔗 Frogging sets mode: +o arkiver
04:55 🔗 wumpus 🙃
04:55 🔗 wumpus holy shit
04:55 🔗 wumpus whew. not allowed in nics
04:55 🔗 Aranje :D
04:55 🔗 Frogging I see a box that describes 0x01F643
04:56 🔗 joepie91 I see a box
04:56 🔗 ravetcofx Frogging: would it be appropriate to make a wiki entry somewhere in regards to the Channel?
04:56 🔗 joepie91 mine doesn't have a sticker on it
04:56 🔗 wumpus yeah, that's the client chaos that I would expect.
04:56 🔗 joepie91 :p
04:56 🔗 DoomTay 回線が込み合っております。時間をおいて再度アクセスしてください
04:56 🔗 Frogging ravetcofx: I am not sure, I don't think that's generally done but maybe?
04:56 🔗 Aranje upside down smiley
04:56 🔗 Aranje heh
04:56 🔗 wyatt8740 wyatt8740 わやと :Erroneous Nickname
04:56 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: we have http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=IRC ?
04:56 🔗 Frogging wumpus: mostly the fact that on most Linux desktop environments, unknown characters display their hex value in a box
04:57 🔗 wyatt8740 doomtay: If I could read kanji I'd respond
04:57 🔗 Frogging JesseW: he means the YouTube channel mentioned earlier
04:57 🔗 wumpus mozilla then amd, anyone else we want to have pointless venting about? amiga marketing failures?
04:57 🔗 DoomTay It basically says "The pipes are full. Please try again later"
04:57 🔗 Frogging which I'm still downloading to a drive that's too small for it and I need to move things off it
04:57 🔗 Frogging and fucking buy more hard drives too
04:57 🔗 Frogging and another computer to put them in
04:57 🔗 joepie91 wumpus: I think the complaints were more about Intel then about AMD :P
04:57 🔗 ravetcofx I would consider his channel a very valuable educational resource
04:57 🔗 wyatt8740 wumpus: I love my amiga 500
04:57 🔗 Frogging how do I money
04:57 🔗 joepie91 ...
04:57 🔗 joepie91 than*
04:57 🔗 joepie91 what the hell
04:57 🔗 joepie91 I've never misspelled that before, what is this
04:57 🔗 wumpus changes topic to: Amiga lovers, oh, and SketchCow is history
04:58 🔗 ravetcofx Frogging: doesn't help our dollar is still in the shitter
04:58 🔗 wyatt8740 wumpus http://i.imgur.com/w5ilCal.jpg
04:58 🔗 SketchCow Whut.
04:58 🔗 Frogging ravetcofx: I know :/
04:59 🔗 wyatt8740 thats my desk
04:59 🔗 SketchCow sets mode: -o wumpus
04:59 🔗 Frogging ravetcofx: slightly less so than before, I guess
04:59 🔗 ravetcofx I keep seeing amazing deals on /r/datahorder, but never for Canadians
04:59 🔗 wyatt8740 circa two weeks ago
04:59 🔗 wumpus EGADS
04:59 🔗 Frogging those speagers!
04:59 🔗 Frogging speakers
04:59 🔗 wumpus stabbed in the back
04:59 🔗 SketchCow changes topic to: Off-topic and lengthy Archive Team items
04:59 🔗 joepie91 oh no, datahoarder crossover
04:59 🔗 Frogging joepie91: ikr?
04:59 🔗 joepie91 ravetcofx: you're not in the datahoarder IRC channel!
04:59 🔗 Frogging I was
04:59 🔗 joepie91 unacceptable
04:59 🔗 Frogging then I left because I have too many channels
04:59 🔗 wumpus sketchcow I hope you're leaving NYC June 1-4 because I'm going to be there
04:59 🔗 ravetcofx Pfff same thing
05:00 🔗 wumpus and we aren't allowed to both be in NYC at the same time
05:00 🔗 wyatt8740 wumpus: that pic's missing the big speakers http://i.imgur.com/za1zWdD.jpg
05:00 🔗 wyatt8740 oh sorry frogging
05:00 🔗 Frogging heh
05:00 🔗 ravetcofx when friends ask why I have so many harddrives, you always say you archive, hording sounds gross :)
05:00 🔗 Sk1d has joined #archiveteam-bs
05:00 🔗 joepie91 ... in my case, it actually -is- archival
05:00 🔗 joepie91 <.<
05:00 🔗 Frogging "I hoard. *room is spotless* it's really subtle"
05:00 🔗 joepie91 I tend to prune data once it's been put somewhere permanently
05:00 🔗 joepie91 :p
05:01 🔗 wyatt8740 http://i.imgur.com/j3HqWbN.jpg my oldest hard drive. 8 bit XT IDE.
05:01 🔗 joepie91 of course the "put somewhere permanently" is permanently delayed
05:01 🔗 Frogging joepie91: somewhere permanent like iCloud!
05:01 🔗 * joepie91 glare
05:01 🔗 wyatt8740 I do not trust the 'cloud'
05:01 🔗 Frogging (joke)
05:01 🔗 wyatt8740 and hate the term
05:01 🔗 Frogging fuck the cloud
05:01 🔗 joepie91 the cloud is the thing that doesn't have enough mass to put things on them
05:02 🔗 joepie91 that should tell you enough
05:02 🔗 joepie91 :p
05:02 🔗 Frogging hehe
05:02 🔗 ravetcofx Frogging: anyways, make an entry on Fire watch or small projects perhaps?
05:02 🔗 wyatt8740 it's like how OS/2 got marketed as 'the totally cool way to use your computer'
05:02 🔗 wyatt8740 I hope that made you cringe
05:02 🔗 wyatt8740 that's actual IBM marketing
05:02 🔗 Frogging let me see if I have a wiki account
05:02 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: that seems reasonable, yeah
05:02 🔗 Frogging actually you can do it if you want
05:02 🔗 ravetcofx which one?
05:03 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: Fire watch, I'd say
05:03 🔗 ravetcofx ok
05:04 🔗 Frogging I see "fire drill" and "death watch"
05:04 🔗 Frogging I assume you mean the latter
05:04 🔗 JesseW death watch, yes
05:04 🔗 Frogging or maybe you mean this http://static1.gamespot.com/uploads/screen_kubrick/1551/15511094/3003451-firewatch.jpg
05:04 🔗 Frogging ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
05:04 🔗 JesseW Frogging: I do rather want to play that game, yes
05:05 🔗 ravetcofx such a pretty game, great story and acting
05:05 🔗 ravetcofx so deathwatch though?
05:05 🔗 Frogging yeah
05:07 🔗 wyatt8740 anyway sketchcow my site's not got a robots.txt but web.archive.org claims it does again
05:07 🔗 wyatt8740 http://wyatt8740.no-ip.org/
05:07 🔗 DoomTay So, wait, what's going to go on deathwatch again?
05:08 🔗 wyatt8740 (site is currently offline but the subdomain's still mine)
05:08 🔗 SketchCow mm
05:09 🔗 ranma do you guys not back up what's on IA?
05:09 🔗 ranma (AT)
05:09 🔗 ranma usually
05:09 🔗 wyatt8740 I still think robots.txt should be abolished or there shouldnne a way for a site owner to specifically request in a special robots.txt that archive.org ignore future revisions of the file
05:10 🔗 SketchCow I'm tiring of this discussion, so let's summarize in three points. Quote at will.
05:10 🔗 wyatt8740 i've read the policy
05:10 🔗 SketchCow 1. The robots.txt policy for IA goes back to 1990s when it wasn't even clear what web archiving WAS
05:11 🔗 SketchCow 2. In the interim time, IA has archived tons of things and pretty much every co-signer to that policy has dropped away
05:11 🔗 SketchCow 3. Shaking up how robots.txt should be treated is a fundamental to-do item that requires Brewster to decide, and as of yet he has not
05:12 🔗 SketchCow Any other information is redundant, malinformed, or wishes
05:12 🔗 Frogging sorry to interject SketchCow, but I thought the issue here was to do with a bug rather than a policy decision
05:12 🔗 SketchCow You are wrong.
05:12 🔗 * wyatt8740 will hold prayers every friday so that brewster may revoke this policy
05:12 🔗 ranma my question is separate from the current convo
05:13 🔗 SketchCow Perhaps some minor thing you're dealing with has some strangeness but it all stems back to the open item of the robots.txt policy
05:13 🔗 Frogging maybe I'm thinking of a different thing that joepie91 (?) and wumpus were discussing earlier
05:13 🔗 wyatt8740 sketchcow: previously my page was accessible via web.archive.org, and the supposed robots.txt file links to a 404
05:13 🔗 joepie91 ranma: do you mean keeping a non-IA copy around of archiveteam stuff, or do you mean backing up IA itself?
05:13 🔗 JesseW ranma: the basic answer to your question, as I understand it, is http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Ia.bak
05:14 🔗 ranma ah, will check it out
05:14 🔗 ranma thanks!
05:14 🔗 wyatt8740 sorry make that no resolution since the server's down now
05:14 🔗 JesseW ranma: we can always use more hard drive space if you can afford it
05:15 🔗 wyatt8740 but not being able to resolve is different from if a robots.txt actually existed
05:15 🔗 Frogging you guys need a Windows client
05:15 🔗 ranma I'd contribute if I could afford to :(
05:15 🔗 ranma HDD wise
05:15 🔗 wyatt8740 you need to stop using windows :p
05:15 🔗 Frogging wyatt8740: I did years ago but sadly not everyone else did :p
05:15 🔗 ranma you need to stop expecting everyone to switch
05:15 🔗 Frogging I do plan to contribute to that when I have the time to expand my storage capacity
05:15 🔗 wyatt8740 I've not had to use windows in nine months.
05:16 🔗 Frogging ranma: hence my comment that they need a windows client
05:16 🔗 ranma I'd love to if "everything just worked"
05:16 🔗 wyatt8740 Cygwin not good enough?
05:16 🔗 JesseW Frogging: we know. Please write one. :-)
05:16 🔗 wyatt8740 debian works fine ;)
05:16 🔗 ranma no dx10 in Linux AFAIK
05:16 🔗 ranma or 12
05:17 🔗 ranma or FFDShow
05:17 🔗 wyatt8740 >proprietary APIs in an open OS
05:17 🔗 Frogging JesseW: I hate writing GUIs >.>
05:17 🔗 wyatt8740 also via wine yes
05:17 🔗 ranma sorry, I game wyatt8740
05:17 🔗 JesseW Frogging: this should have a really minimal UI, AFAIK...
05:17 🔗 Aranje yes wine is quite performant and has pretty decent support these days
05:17 🔗 wyatt8740 cygwin with an X server not enough?
05:17 🔗 Aranje they got an entire dx stack donated a year ago
05:17 🔗 ravetcofx Frogging: we may also want to archive his website https://www.rossmanngroup.com/
05:17 🔗 JesseW and if you write all but the UI parts, that would be quite helpful in any case
05:18 🔗 ravetcofx and https://mailin.repair/
05:18 🔗 ranma including 12, Aranje?
05:18 🔗 Aranje ranma:) I don't know, but it had 10
05:18 🔗 ranma I wanna play quantum leap
05:18 🔗 wyatt8740 I just play minecraft and emulate a wii
05:18 🔗 ravetcofx I'm not sure how to go about that
05:19 🔗 ranma well, wine app db doesn't have gold + for half of my fave games
05:19 🔗 wumpus the bug I mentioned is a minor thing. SketchCow mentioned the overall issue, which is what it is.
05:19 🔗 wyatt8740 which are?
05:19 🔗 joepie91 ranma: fwiw, have you looked at playonlinux?
05:19 🔗 ranma never heard of it
05:19 🔗 wyatt8740 and how old are the games' ratings
05:19 🔗 joepie91 it gets a lot of shit to work that is either a pain with WINE itself, or that's even rated below-silver on winehq
05:19 🔗 joepie91 ranma: basically a wrapper for WINE and doxbos that has pre-set profiles for games
05:20 🔗 wyatt8740 PoL is a professionally supported version of wine
05:20 🔗 joepie91 and will manage a separate WINE/dosbox instance for each game with its optimal settings
05:20 🔗 joepie91 out of the box
05:20 🔗 joepie91 wyatt8740: it's not, you're confused with crossover I think
05:20 🔗 wyatt8740 oh dur
05:20 🔗 wyatt8740 yeah
05:20 🔗 joepie91 ranma: it doesn't support -everything- but it gets a lot of stuff to work out of the box, using community-provided setup scripts
05:20 🔗 wyatt8740 winetricks sounds a lot like PoL
05:20 🔗 joepie91 (plus basically almost all of GOG's catalog works with it, because GOG itself contributes scripts to PoL)
05:20 🔗 Frogging it's not, but it is used by PoL
05:20 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: I've put both of those into #archivebot
05:21 🔗 wyatt8740 The last time I bought a windows PC game was in 2005
05:21 🔗 joepie91 hm, does PoL still use winetricks?
05:21 🔗 joepie91 I thought they do that themselves now?
05:21 🔗 wyatt8740 Star Wars Battlefront II
05:21 🔗 ravetcofx JesseW: thanks, I should look into getting that set up
05:21 🔗 joepie91 anyhow, winetricks is only part of the story :P
05:21 🔗 wyatt8740 works great in wine
05:21 🔗 joepie91 ranma: https://www.playonlinux.com/en/supported_apps-1-0.html
05:21 🔗 ravetcofx I added the blurb on the Deathwatch page
05:22 🔗 Aranje indeed
05:22 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: well, archivebot is commanded just from the #archivebot channel -- but if you would be willing to run a pipeline for it, that would be very welcome!
05:23 🔗 ravetcofx JesseW: I would definatly be willing to do that, can I limit how much space gets used up?
05:23 🔗 joepie91 ranma: anyway, I won't claim that every Windows application will run on Linux, but in -many- cases, you can get very far if not all the way, with PoL+WINE, open-source alternatives for things, or even a VM with GPU passthrough
05:24 🔗 joepie91 so I wouldn't disclaim the possibility until you've determined that it really won't work
05:24 🔗 yipdw JesseW: I'd prefer to hold off on the new pipelines for now
05:24 🔗 joepie91 :p
05:24 🔗 Frogging ravetcofx: the requirements are a bit steep, really
05:24 🔗 ravetcofx I have a free TB
05:24 🔗 ravetcofx need to get more hdd's
05:24 🔗 JesseW yipdw: ah, good to know -- I won't invite people to make them, then.
05:25 🔗 JesseW AFAIK, HCross is still looking for more newsgrabber pipelines, though.
05:25 🔗 wumpus newsgrabber is one of my favorite projects
05:30 🔗 ravetcofx I don't know if you guys saw my other post, but has anyone managed to grab sunrise calendar?
05:30 🔗 ranma will check it out, joepie91
05:34 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: I'm not sure how we'd grab that... http://calendar.sunrise.am
05:35 🔗 JesseW ranma: did you mean me, not joepie?
05:35 🔗 ravetcofx I know :/
05:36 🔗 ranma was referring to the PoL thing
05:37 🔗 ranma reading the article now, JesseW
05:38 🔗 DoomTay Funny, I think it was pretty recently thar Louis Rossmann said he would keep making videos in spite of Apple's thing
05:38 🔗 ravetcofx JesseW: I'll try grabbing the sources, then try to see if it's plausible to strip server auth
05:39 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: great
05:40 🔗 DoomTay and IA is being real slow at the worst time
05:40 🔗 ravetcofx I don't know if it'll have much cultural significance though
05:43 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: where did it announce it was shutting down?
05:43 🔗 JesseW how long do we have?
05:43 🔗 ravetcofx http://blog.sunrise.am/post/144196642739/its-almost-time-to-say-goodbye
05:44 🔗 ravetcofx JesseW: till Aug 31st
05:45 🔗 JesseW Ah, then yeah, grabbing everything we can is a good idea just so people with personal stuff they care about can get it from our copy (hopefully).
05:45 🔗 JesseW Any wider cultural benefit is secondary.
05:46 🔗 ravetcofx JesseW: it doesn't seem to actually hold any data, it's a front end for other cloud based calendars
05:46 🔗 ravetcofx so personal data isn't of concern
05:47 🔗 JesseW Yeah, I saw that. Well, that's much better then.
05:47 🔗 JesseW http://support.sunrise.am/article/95-how-does-sunrise-work
05:47 🔗 JesseW So aside from the web site (which I'll grab with #archivebot) what else is there?
05:47 🔗 ravetcofx the android APKs
05:48 🔗 ravetcofx maybe screen shots of the calendar and how it worked for cultural significance
05:48 🔗 DoomTay In other news, Wayback Machine is being ridiculous right now. If I have a certain number of tabs open, they take forever to load, but if I have only 5 at once, everything is nice and fast
05:49 🔗 ranma JesseW, is there a preferred time frame that the storage be available?
05:49 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: I'm not sure what the best way to grab the APKs is -- if you figure out how, do upload them
05:49 🔗 JesseW ranma: for IA.BAK?
05:50 🔗 schbirid has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
05:50 🔗 ranma or is that elsewhere in the faq?
05:50 🔗 ravetcofx JesseW: http://www.apkmirror.com/apk/microsoft-corporation/sunrise/sunrise-4-2-0-release/sunrise-4-2-0-android-apk-download/
05:50 🔗 ranma I know permanent is preferred
05:51 🔗 ravetcofx JesseW: and you were grabbing support.sunrise as well?
05:54 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: yep
05:55 🔗 JesseW ranma: for IA.BAK, as I understand it, the longer the better, but permanent is not required (the tracker will notice and adjust)
05:55 🔗 ravetcofx JesseW: let me know if you make a collection on the Internet Archive so I can add the APK's
05:56 🔗 JesseW ravetcofx: I can't make IA collections -- but you can still upload them just to the general software collection, I think.
05:56 🔗 yipdw cross-compiling with cmake to make debian packages is a special kind of software development hell
06:00 🔗 yipdw screw this
06:00 🔗 * yipdw wires up an ARM board
06:00 🔗 dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
06:04 🔗 dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
06:16 🔗 wyatt8740 has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
06:17 🔗 DoomTay has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed)
06:17 🔗 BlueMaxim has joined #archiveteam-bs
06:47 🔗 JesseW has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 370 seconds)
07:25 🔗 wumpus has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed)
07:37 🔗 SketchCow IA.BAK needs to go to the next level.
07:37 🔗 SketchCow I have faith
07:39 🔗 joepie91 yipdw: you know how there are multiple circles of hell?
07:39 🔗 joepie91 yeah, well. :P
07:47 🔗 yipdw joepie91: fortunately this one ended up being a missing CMAKE_C_COMPILER setting
08:08 🔗 joepie91 (ignore the repos I just created on github, they're an experimental thing)
08:14 🔗 tomwsmf-a has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
09:09 🔗 dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
09:21 🔗 dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
10:31 🔗 BlueMaxim has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
10:42 🔗 HCross Do we have an easy way to download Simple Machines forums?
10:44 🔗 r3c0d3x has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
10:51 🔗 kristian_ has joined #archiveteam-bs
11:14 🔗 mls has joined #archiveteam-bs
11:14 🔗 r3c0d3x has joined #archiveteam-bs
11:23 🔗 r3c0d3x has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
11:26 🔗 joepie91 http://rosalindgardner.com/blog/where-to-buy-content-for-your-site/ <- sigh
11:26 🔗 joepie91 these kind of things just make me sad
11:27 🔗 joepie91 HCross: any particular reason they need special treatment...?
11:27 🔗 HCross I dont know, probably the ordinary forums igset would work
11:28 🔗 joepie91 it should :P
11:35 🔗 r3c0d3x has joined #archiveteam-bs
11:35 🔗 dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
11:36 🔗 dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
11:42 🔗 mls Heya HCross, fancy seeing you here
11:42 🔗 HCross hi. trying to think where I remember you from now
11:43 🔗 mls Don't, you'll melt your brain :P
11:43 🔗 mls Different nick, different ident
11:43 🔗 HCross yea.. ive just been through a load of chans trying to work it out
11:44 🔗 mls I still have it on log in case you really want to see for yourself
11:44 🔗 HCross nah, idc
11:44 🔗 mls =)
11:45 🔗 mls You might recall Kksmkrn, been on very briefly when telenor went bust
11:47 🔗 j08nY has joined #archiveteam-bs
11:50 🔗 mls Actually home.no went bust, I'm remembering it wrong
11:57 🔗 joepie91 mls: vaguely recall you
11:57 🔗 joepie91 very very vaguely
12:03 🔗 SketchCow Hey, was added to three more repositories for a project? Cross?
12:04 🔗 HCross joepie91, didnt you say you were doing something?
12:04 🔗 joepie91 yeah, those are my repos
12:05 🔗 joepie91 that's just github sending out dumb notices
12:05 🔗 joepie91 it seems to do that for any newly created repo
12:05 🔗 joepie91 (I didn't explicitly add anybody)
12:05 🔗 joepie91 cc SketchCow
12:05 🔗 SketchCow Got it
12:06 🔗 godane hey SketchCow
12:07 🔗 godane i'm up to 11k items in my inbox
12:08 🔗 godane i'm grabbing those Flight International Mgazines
12:09 🔗 godane they only made one pdf per a page
12:09 🔗 godane so i have to grab them then then make pdfs for each of the magazine dates
12:22 🔗 SketchCow Nice
12:25 🔗 arkiver has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
12:27 🔗 remsen has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
12:28 🔗 superkuh has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
12:29 🔗 superkuh has joined #archiveteam-bs
12:30 🔗 arkiver has joined #archiveteam-bs
12:33 🔗 remsen has joined #archiveteam-bs
13:40 🔗 mls joepie91: Glad to hear, especially since I was here for such a short time
13:43 🔗 Yoshimura has joined #archiveteam-bs
14:18 🔗 Igloo luckcolor: a wget recursive works
14:18 🔗 kristian_ has quit IRC (Leaving)
14:18 🔗 Igloo So not sure why the crawl wont
14:18 🔗 luckcolor mmh
14:25 🔗 bzc6p has joined #archiveteam-bs
14:25 🔗 swebb sets mode: +o bzc6p
14:25 🔗 Igloo working on the domain whole it pulls correly luckcolor
14:25 🔗 luckcolor good
14:25 🔗 Igloo Weird why it won't pull the subdomain
14:25 🔗 Igloo We could just pull the whole site
14:25 🔗 Igloo it suggests a region of 500million + items though
14:31 🔗 dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
14:40 🔗 dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
14:44 🔗 bzc6p Discussion moved to #greatlookup
15:10 🔗 PurpleSym Igloo: There’s two pages for dnshistory now. See above.
15:14 🔗 Igloo Lol, we were doing it at the same time ¬_¬
15:14 🔗 Igloo I'll tidy up.
15:15 🔗 Igloo PurpleSym: the apge I made has more information in it. Which one do you want to keep?
15:16 🔗 PurpleSym I’d keep your, but move it to “DNS History”.
15:17 🔗 PurpleSym *yours
15:19 🔗 Igloo I can only move, I can't delete the other one
15:20 🔗 PurpleSym Yeah, same for me. Not sure who’s got delete privileges on the Wiki.
15:22 🔗 bzc6p Blank the page, put Template:deleteme on it and one day it will be deleted
15:23 🔗 Igloo Ok, I can't move the page to the right URL because of the redirect page still.
15:25 🔗 bzc6p has left
15:30 🔗 JesseW has joined #archiveteam-bs
15:36 🔗 DoomTay has joined #archiveteam-bs
15:43 🔗 DoomTay Uh?
15:43 🔗 DoomTay Why is the page on DNS History to be deleted
15:47 🔗 PurpleSym There are two pages, the other one is http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Dnshistory
15:48 🔗 DoomTay Just by visiting the site I think the other "spelling" is more accurate
15:56 🔗 JesseW has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 370 seconds)
15:59 🔗 arkiver2 has joined #archiveteam-bs
16:00 🔗 Yoshimura has quit IRC (http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client)
16:03 🔗 arkiver2 has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
16:06 🔗 DoomTay Damn, it looks like Arkiver was right. A plain old page crawl seems to have failed to save the flash stuff
16:43 🔗 kvieta has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
16:43 🔗 SamiPiplu has joined #archiveteam-bs
16:46 🔗 SamiPiplu Ugh, using on my phone. Anyways, there's this small but deticated community you could help possibly, but first, I have a question. If a site has downloadable files on it, and you back it up, do you backup the downloads too?
16:47 🔗 Igloo Depends
16:47 🔗 Igloo What are they?
16:50 🔗 SamiPiplu You see, there was a popular 90's game called Petz. It was a virtual pet game that had dogs and cats that were stored as files you could send to other people. Y
16:51 🔗 ravetcofx Frogging: hey, calexil a moderator on some subreddits and also from the Linuxmint rooms created a torrent for all the Louis Rossmann videos
16:51 🔗 Frogging ravetcofx: really?
16:51 🔗 Igloo Go on SamiPiplu...
16:52 🔗 ravetcofx Frogging: yeah, one issue though is it doesn't have any metadata https://kat.cr/louis-rossmann-backup-t12864278.html
16:52 🔗 dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
16:53 🔗 SamiPiplu The game was easily moddable, and people took advantage of that. Files for mods were on like, every Petz centered website. But most Petz sites have died out, and the files have been lost.
16:53 🔗 Frogging ravetcofx: my download died overnight, I resumed it and it's currently at 242/703 and 116G
16:53 🔗 ravetcofx so i'm still downloading on my end at 250/700 videos
16:54 🔗 ravetcofx Frogging: got to love our shit ISP's
16:54 🔗 Frogging it was my router's fault actually
16:54 🔗 Frogging not their router either
16:55 🔗 Igloo SamiPiplu: in that case if we were to archive one of the modding sites, downloads would be preserved yes
16:55 🔗 ris has joined #archiveteam-bs
16:55 🔗 Igloo (Assuming it's not a horrendous pain in th arse to to do so)
16:55 🔗 joepie91 Petz!
16:56 🔗 joepie91 SamiPiplu: generally, the approach is "archive first, ask questions later"
16:56 🔗 joepie91 :P
16:56 🔗 ravetcofx Frogging: I'm with Telus here in Alberta, supposedly 20 down, but I never see it go higher than 2
16:56 🔗 Frogging I think we get 35 down
16:57 🔗 Frogging which is what we pay for
16:57 🔗 RedType has quit IRC (Quit: leaving)
16:57 🔗 dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
16:57 🔗 Frogging or maybe it's 30 or 25
16:57 🔗 Frogging all I know is it's "fast enough"
16:58 🔗 ravetcofx no such thing as fast enough, we shouldn't settle till we have google fibre up here
16:59 🔗 SamiPiplu So if anyone can find intact files that end in .pet, .cat, or .dog, you might have a lost file. Or maybe an already recovered one. Either way, it would be awesome if any can be found?
16:59 🔗 Frogging I don't really care for giving Google any more power
17:00 🔗 Igloo That's a bit of an open ended query SamiPiplu, Do you have any sites in particular you would like saving?
17:00 🔗 SamiPiplu http://laf.simplesuccess.us Here's a site that 's looking for files. They only accept submissions of files they are actively seeking out, though.
17:01 🔗 Frogging And 35/30/whatever really is fast enough for me.
17:01 🔗 kvieta has joined #archiveteam-bs
17:01 🔗 Frogging I have remote servers for when I really need bigger pipes
17:02 🔗 SamiPiplu There's one called faerie barn dance. Loads of files were on it, but it was shut down years ago, and only a small fraction of the files have been recovered.
17:02 🔗 JW_work SamiPiplu: if you have any ideas of possible domain names, you could look them up on the Wayback Machine and see what's there. If they were grabbed by ArchiveTeam's #archivebot directly, you can also search (by domain name) on the archivebot viewer, http://archive.fart.website/archivebot/viewer/
17:03 🔗 Frogging unfortunately my dedicated server has been blocked by YouTube
17:03 🔗 SamiPiplu The site itself is found and archived, but not the downloads.
17:03 🔗 JW_work you could also download all the index files for all of the #archivebot material, and do a local search for the extensions you mentioned.
17:05 🔗 JW_work also, you may be able to use IA's search interface to see if anyone has uploaded files with those extensions as items (not as part of the Wayback Machine), although I'm not sure exactly how to make such a search
17:06 🔗 joepie91 [19:03] <Frogging> unfortunately my dedicated server has been blocked by YouTube
17:06 🔗 joepie91 how.. did you manage that
17:06 🔗 Frogging I have no clue
17:06 🔗 Frogging I imagine something to do with ArchiveBot
17:06 🔗 Frogging but like
17:06 🔗 joepie91 that's seriously impressive
17:06 🔗 joepie91 I've downloaded hundreds of pages of search results in hours
17:06 🔗 joepie91 and I've never gotten blocked
17:07 🔗 Frogging john@alopex:~$ curl -I https://www.youtube.com/
17:07 🔗 Frogging HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
17:07 🔗 joepie91 literally sometimes pulling in a few hundred gigs in one go
17:07 🔗 joepie91 heh
17:07 🔗 Frogging I know, it makes no sense at all
17:07 🔗 Frogging and it's been like this for months
17:07 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: what provider?
17:07 🔗 Frogging Kimsufi (OVH's budget brand)
17:08 🔗 ravetcofx has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 506 seconds)
17:08 🔗 Frogging maybe it's not me but the subnet
17:08 🔗 joepie91 yeah
17:08 🔗 Frogging but still, it's weird
17:08 🔗 joepie91 I'm thinking they're on the sketchy list
17:08 🔗 joepie91 :p
17:08 🔗 Frogging I guess I could proxy through my VPS, but that's in the US and the server is in France
17:08 🔗 Frogging and TCP across oceans is garbage
17:08 🔗 joepie91 yeah
17:08 🔗 joepie91 say bye bye to your bandwidth
17:09 🔗 joepie91 :p
17:09 🔗 metalcamp has joined #archiveteam-bs
17:09 🔗 Frogging bandwidth wouldn't be an issue, the VPS has more than the dedi
17:09 🔗 Frogging it's just the wildly inconsistent throughput
17:10 🔗 joepie91 Frogging: yes, I did mean bandwidth
17:10 🔗 joepie91 not traffic
17:10 🔗 joepie91 :p
17:10 🔗 Frogging I did too but maybe I'm getting confused on some finer points :p
17:11 🔗 Frogging Dedicated server has symmetrical 100Mbit. VPS has 125Mbit out and 40Gbit in
17:11 🔗 Igloo I have an OVH server in france
17:11 🔗 Igloo 46.105.103.x subnet
17:11 🔗 Frogging dedicated server has unmetred traffic and the VPS has a 2TB incoming limit
17:11 🔗 Igloo that can curl youtube
17:12 🔗 Frogging john@spydo ~/gits/muffin $ dig +short alopex.fastquake.com
17:12 🔗 Frogging 91.121.76.34
17:13 🔗 Igloo matt@dedicated1:~$ curl -I https://www.youtube.com/
17:13 🔗 Igloo HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
17:13 🔗 Igloo Mines just gone for the 2nd attempt
17:13 🔗 Frogging wow
17:13 🔗 Igloo MegaWarrior:/home/archiveteam/heritrix/heritrix-3.1.1/jobs# curl -I https://www.youtube.com/
17:13 🔗 Igloo HTTP/1.1 200 OK
17:14 🔗 Igloo Kimsufi server in Canada is OK though
17:14 🔗 Igloo Guess people haven't been norty there yet
17:15 🔗 SamiPiplu has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 268 seconds)
17:16 🔗 ravetcofx has joined #archiveteam-bs
17:19 🔗 HCross YouTube works fine from my OVH.com server - using Opera 38
17:22 🔗 closure has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
17:22 🔗 joepie91 you might just be throttled more quickly on OVH ranges
17:22 🔗 joepie91 not outright blocked
17:24 🔗 mls has quit IRC (Quit: Lost terminal)
17:25 🔗 mls has joined #archiveteam-bs
17:31 🔗 RedType has joined #archiveteam-bs
17:55 🔗 Frogging joepie91: I'm at 259/703 with 128GB
17:57 🔗 ndiddy has joined #archiveteam-bs
18:43 🔗 ring has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
18:43 🔗 ring has joined #archiveteam-bs
19:28 🔗 ivan` you need youtube-dl -4 on OVH because the IPv6 ranges are blocked
19:28 🔗 ivan` and testing with curl is pointless because there's probably a UA filter
19:30 🔗 ivan` Google has a really sophisticated firewall at their edge that combines IP address & your TCP characteristics & early data sent in the HTTP request
19:31 🔗 Igloo That's fair enough, Good to know
19:31 🔗 Igloo Wonder why the IPV6 ranges are blocked?
19:31 🔗 ivan` one way you can get on the No Route list is by logging into your own youtube account for every video via youtube-dl option
19:31 🔗 ivan` Igloo: heh probably because tracking the reputation of IPv6 space is a lot more troublesome than IPv4 space
19:32 🔗 ivan` people get too many IPv6 IPs
19:32 🔗 Igloo a /64 for every vm / dedicated? Naaah ;)
19:40 🔗 JW_work has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 370 seconds)
19:45 🔗 JW_work has joined #archiveteam-bs
19:48 🔗 DoomTay Does it mean anything that something's up with DNS History's SSL credentials?
19:49 🔗 DoomTay At least, if it includes www.?
20:39 🔗 DoomTay has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed)
20:46 🔗 ravetcofx has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 506 seconds)
20:50 🔗 ravetcofx has joined #archiveteam-bs
21:01 🔗 JesseW has joined #archiveteam-bs
21:05 🔗 dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
21:07 🔗 metalcamp has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
21:13 🔗 dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
21:32 🔗 JesseW has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 370 seconds)
21:44 🔗 JesseW has joined #archiveteam-bs
21:45 🔗 DoomTay has joined #archiveteam-bs
21:52 🔗 BlueMaxim has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:25 🔗 tomwsmf-a has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:36 🔗 JesseW1 has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:37 🔗 JesseW2 has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:37 🔗 JesseW3 has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:38 🔗 JesseW3 has quit IRC (Client Quit)
22:38 🔗 JesseW1 has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
22:38 🔗 JesseW1 has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:39 🔗 JesseW has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
22:41 🔗 JesseW2 has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
23:00 🔗 SmileyG ltiscreen setup?
23:00 🔗 SmileyG [23:19:05] < arvut> as in more than 3
23:00 🔗 SmileyG https://www.reddit.com/r/privacy/comments/4q840n/terrorism_blacklist_i_have_a_copy_should_it_be/
23:01 🔗 JesseW1 edocr -- lololol
23:06 🔗 SmileyG people still fighting about that?
23:07 🔗 SmileyG re: talking in #archiveteam
23:09 🔗 SmileyG #NoFightinInTheWarRoom
23:10 🔗 Frogging The guy who posted that is somewhat of an attention whore
23:10 🔗 Frogging not because of this but because he does this all the time
23:11 🔗 SmileyG just fucking ban his ass.
23:12 🔗 SmileyG he can come and bitch here instead
23:12 🔗 Frogging no I meant the reddit guy :p
23:12 🔗 Frogging sorry
23:14 🔗 SmileyG ojh hahaah
23:14 🔗 SmileyG oh right
23:14 🔗 SmileyG Does he find a lot of 'stuff' then?
23:14 🔗 SmileyG Wow
23:14 🔗 SmileyG I just platinum'ed peggle 2
23:14 🔗 xmc ...
23:14 🔗 Frogging yes he does
23:28 🔗 SmileyG yah
23:28 🔗 SmileyG :/
23:29 🔗 dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
23:30 🔗 dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
23:31 🔗 JesseW1 is now known as JesseW

irclogger-viewer