#archiveteam-bs 2016-07-13,Wed

↑back Search

Time Nickname Message
00:27 πŸ”— tomwsmf has joined #archiveteam-bs
00:43 πŸ”— JesseW has joined #archiveteam-bs
00:48 πŸ”— ring has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 633 seconds)
01:01 πŸ”— ring has joined #archiveteam-bs
01:06 πŸ”— JesseW has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 370 seconds)
01:13 πŸ”— ring has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 632 seconds)
01:32 πŸ”— ndiddy has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
01:35 πŸ”— tomwsmf has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
01:36 πŸ”— ring has joined #archiveteam-bs
01:47 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
01:50 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
01:52 πŸ”— ravetcofx has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
01:54 πŸ”— tomwsmf has joined #archiveteam-bs
01:56 πŸ”— ravetcofx has joined #archiveteam-bs
02:01 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
02:05 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
02:09 πŸ”— JesseW has joined #archiveteam-bs
02:38 πŸ”— tomwsmf has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
03:12 πŸ”— RichardG has quit IRC (Quit: Keyboard not found, press F1 to continue)
03:15 πŸ”— aschmitz_ is now known as aschmitz
03:16 πŸ”— aschmitz joepie91: Is it possible to archive IPFS? Not that I'm saying we should, but can you enumerate objects even if you don't know about them in advance?
03:32 πŸ”— RichardG has joined #archiveteam-bs
03:32 πŸ”— joepie91 aschmitz: not reasonably
03:33 πŸ”— joepie91 it's content-addressable, so by definition it should have unpredictable/unguessable hashes to make it secure enough
03:33 πŸ”— joepie91 so unless you have friends at the NSA... :)
03:34 πŸ”— joepie91 that having been said, there are several mechanisms for providing indexes/structure to IPFS objects
03:34 πŸ”— joepie91 that might be more enumerable
03:46 πŸ”— * Frogging googles IPFS
03:46 πŸ”— Frogging this looks like unreliable cansur
03:47 πŸ”— espes__ has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
03:47 πŸ”— Frogging lol TechCrunch article
03:47 πŸ”— Frogging "IPFS isn't exactly a well-known technology yet, even among many in the Valley"
03:47 πŸ”— Frogging >the Valley
03:48 πŸ”— Frogging oh please
03:49 πŸ”— JesseW joepie91: First of all, I think you are right to worry about the effects that making it easier to rely on peers for distribution will have on reliability. However, I don't think the new distributed protocols themselves *require* this abdication of responsibility for backups, and they do make it easier to regularly check that backups are in sync.
03:50 πŸ”— JesseW Also, I'm not sure I (yet) understand what you mean by "this trend of building everything on top of IPFS". Can you expand on that?
03:59 πŸ”— joepie91 JesseW: there's been a lot of hype amongst devs lately to redesign everything on top of IPFS
03:59 πŸ”— joepie91 image hosts, Git, NPM
03:59 πŸ”— joepie91 basically, lots of things that host user content
03:59 πŸ”— joepie91 it's been a thing of the past year or so
03:59 πŸ”— joepie91 but there are working prototypes
04:00 πŸ”— joepie91 and while i agree that the protocols don't require it, it's the default
04:00 πŸ”— joepie91 and it needs to be explicitly mitigated against before adopting said protocols
04:03 πŸ”— Frogging is reinventing the wheel trendy nowadays
04:03 πŸ”— Frogging I feel like it is
04:03 πŸ”— JesseW Frogging: reinventing the wheel has always been trendy
04:03 πŸ”— JesseW joepie91: Hm. What do you see as possible "explicit mitigations"?
04:04 πŸ”— Frogging long retention time baked in?
04:04 πŸ”— JesseW Frogging: I'd say that's the opposite of a mitigation -- that makes it *easier* to not think explicitly about reliablity
04:04 πŸ”— JesseW (whee, spelling)
04:05 πŸ”— Frogging hmm. perhaps
04:06 πŸ”— Frogging you can't really mitigate the fact that people just don't care
04:06 πŸ”— Frogging though
04:06 πŸ”— JesseW I'm not sure, but I lean more towards explicit support for agreements between peers to keep copies of each others material, and
04:08 πŸ”— JesseW automatic trawlers that make offline copies of material with alarmingly few seeds, then ransom it
04:08 πŸ”— JesseW (thereby discouraging people from letting them be the only holders of copies)
04:08 πŸ”— Frogging what's the ransom bit needed for
04:08 πŸ”— Frogging Or how does that work
04:09 πŸ”— JesseW otherwise people would just rely on the trawlers, which would raise their costs too high to run
04:09 πŸ”— Frogging people wouldn't do so regardless?
04:10 πŸ”— JesseW what I was thinking of is -- a program that looks for things with, say, 3 seeds -- and makes a copy of the thing, but *offline*. Then, if/when there are *no* seeds, it advertises that it will seed the thing after a specific payment is made.
04:11 πŸ”— JesseW So, if you want something distributed, you can either make sure there are always enough seeds -- or you can pay the ransom.
04:12 πŸ”— JesseW And the trawler would only seed for a fixed period of time -- if no-one else picks up a copy soon enough, back down it goes, and the next ransom is higher.
04:12 πŸ”— Chorca has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
04:15 πŸ”— joepie91 JesseW: freenet solves this with a balancing mechanism that tries to replicate rare content, iirc
04:15 πŸ”— joepie91 but I'm fuzzy on the specifics
04:15 πŸ”— joepie91 I haven't thought into this particular case *too* far though
04:15 πŸ”— joepie91 or how to solve it
04:15 πŸ”— joepie91 problem is that IPFS intends to be a set of building blocks
04:15 πŸ”— joepie91 for other applications
04:15 πŸ”— joepie91 so there's not really a one-size-fits-all solution
04:16 πŸ”— espes__ has joined #archiveteam-bs
04:16 πŸ”— JesseW Nods. That makes sense
04:16 πŸ”— Chorca has joined #archiveteam-bs
04:37 πŸ”— espes__ has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
04:38 πŸ”— espes__ has joined #archiveteam-bs
04:58 πŸ”— Sk1d has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 250 seconds)
05:05 πŸ”— Sk1d has joined #archiveteam-bs
05:23 πŸ”— JesseW joepie91: I was talking about what you brought up elsewhere, and someone mentioned that IPFS explicitly doesn't make any guarantee of peers storing data -- so that may help at least somewhat in regards to discouraging irresponsibility with backups
05:24 πŸ”— JesseW maybe relevant link: https://github.com/ipfs/faq/issues/93
05:25 πŸ”— superkuh has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
05:27 πŸ”— joepie91 JesseW: yeah, but people don't read docs
05:27 πŸ”— joepie91 that's why I said this is a game theory problem
05:27 πŸ”— joepie91 it's not based on what people *understand* about the technology, but how people *perceive* it
05:28 πŸ”— joepie91 (I also think that the descriptor of "permanent" is incredibly confusing here and shouldn't ever have been used - deterministic would've been much more appropriate, for example)
05:29 πŸ”— JesseW I certainly agree with you about the permanent vs deterministic vocab choice, yes.
05:30 πŸ”— JesseW most people don't read most docs, but some people read some docs -- so docs do have some effect
05:32 πŸ”— joepie91 'some effect' isn't enough here
05:32 πŸ”— joepie91 and even if they do
05:32 πŸ”— joepie91 that does not necessarily change their behaviour
05:32 πŸ”— joepie91 example: good luck obtaining the second email dump from the hbgary hack
05:32 πŸ”— joepie91 it was all over the internet
05:32 πŸ”— joepie91 exemplary of an era
05:33 πŸ”— joepie91 it's completely impossible to find an intact copy
05:33 πŸ”— joepie91 all the torrents are dead
05:33 πŸ”— joepie91 all those who had an interest in it thought that somebody else would seed it
05:33 πŸ”— joepie91 despite being fully well aware of how torrents do not provide persistence either
05:40 πŸ”— davidar_ joepie91: are you suggesting it's less likely that content would have disappeared if it was served from a central host?
05:41 πŸ”— superkuh has joined #archiveteam-bs
05:41 πŸ”— JesseW I'm not sure a definitively illegal, nontrivially-sized piece of content is a particularly good example
05:41 πŸ”— davidar_ mm
05:41 πŸ”— JesseW And just because none of the people who downloaded are currently seeding it doesn't mean that none of them don't still have copies offline.
05:42 πŸ”— JesseW hi davidar_
05:42 πŸ”— Aranje has quit IRC (Quit: Three sheets to the wind)
05:43 πŸ”— davidar_ given the amount of content that goes missing from the web normally, I'm having trouble seeing how ipfs will cause massive data loss in comparison
05:44 πŸ”— davidar_ even when people know they have to make backups they don't
05:47 πŸ”— joepie91 davidar_: no, not necessarily. I'm just pointing out that the "if people know there's no permanence guarantee, they will keep it around" reasoning doesn't work in practice
05:47 πŸ”— joepie91 people don't make decisions that way
05:48 πŸ”— godane i just noticed now that i put the john legere videos as being from 2015-01-07
05:48 πŸ”— joepie91 and if you compare unintentional unavailability of torrents to unintentional unavailability of centralized content... then torrents fare *far, far* worse
05:48 πŸ”— godane when there from 2016-01-07
05:48 πŸ”— godane i fixed the metadata now: https://archive.org/details/john-legere-twitter-periscope-video-2015-01-07
05:49 πŸ”— joepie91 JesseW: fwiw, I've been looking for this particular piece of data for the past... 1-2 years now?
05:49 πŸ”— joepie91 so if you can find an offline copy, that would be much appreciated ;)
05:49 πŸ”— JesseW joepie91: are you sure that is *unintentional* unavailability
05:50 πŸ”— davidar_ I didn't argue that - if nobody keeps a copy of content, then it's gone (ipfs or not)
05:50 πŸ”— JesseW joepie91: I doubt I know the right people. But if I do, I'll let you know
05:50 πŸ”— joepie91 JesseW: am I sure that *what* is unintentional unavailability?
05:50 πŸ”— davidar_ and centralised webpages disappear all the time (hence wayback)
05:50 πŸ”— JesseW "if you compare unintentional unavailability of torrents to unintentional unavailability of centralized content"
05:50 πŸ”— joepie91 davidar_: 'unavailability' isn't a useful metric
05:51 πŸ”— joepie91 intentional vs. unintentional unavailability are two completely different things
05:51 πŸ”— joepie91 the only thing they have in common is that you can no longer access it
05:51 πŸ”— JesseW I agree that lots more torrents become unavailable -- but I suspect a lot of that is intentional
05:51 πŸ”— joepie91 JesseW: I doubt that
05:51 πŸ”— JesseW why?
05:51 πŸ”— joepie91 torrents simply die out as they become less popular
05:51 πŸ”— joepie91 public torrents, that is
05:51 πŸ”— joepie91 there are entire TV series that are nigh impossible to torrent
05:51 πŸ”— joepie91 because they die out 2-3 months after broadcast
05:52 πŸ”— joepie91 because nobody feels responsible for keeping it around
05:52 πŸ”— JesseW and why do you think this is unintentional?
05:52 πŸ”— joepie91 and "I can just torrent it again later" is a common refrain
05:52 πŸ”— joepie91 JesseW: because each individual peer did not decide to "make the torrent unavailable"
05:52 πŸ”— joepie91 they just decided that their seeding was not necessary
05:52 πŸ”— joepie91 unlikely to be with the intention to affect the torrent as a whole
05:52 πŸ”— JesseW and their keeping a local copy, also
05:53 πŸ”— joepie91 yes, but then the above comes into play.
05:53 πŸ”— JesseW because if they still had a local copy, and noticed there were no seeds, they could just reseed
05:53 πŸ”— joepie91 lots of people thinking "oh I don't need to back this up, I can torrent it later"
05:53 πŸ”— joepie91 JesseW: that doesn't happen in practice.
05:53 πŸ”— joepie91 look, we can go on about "in theory" until we're blue in the face, but that doesn't change how people actually use these technologies
05:53 πŸ”— davidar_ if nobody cared about the content enough to host it, it's irrelevant what distribution system people are using
05:54 πŸ”— davidar_ if nobody cares enough to keep a web server running, that website disappears
05:54 πŸ”— joepie91 and how people actually use these technologies, is that the general public does not feel responsible for the data they are seeding, even if they know that there is a risk of it disappearing, and EVEN if they (rationally) know that that means that they might not be able to get a copy later even if they want it
05:54 πŸ”— joepie91 sigh
05:54 πŸ”— joepie91 if you're going to ignore the entire psychological aspect of this, then I'm going to step out of this discussion
05:54 πŸ”— joepie91 because clearly there's no useful discussion to be had
05:55 πŸ”— joepie91 I'm not talking about fucking technology here
05:55 πŸ”— JesseW I don't dispute the psychology is the central point
05:55 πŸ”— joepie91 I'm talking about _human behaviour_
05:55 πŸ”— joepie91 how people interact with shit
05:55 πŸ”— joepie91 and I end up having to repeat the same shit over and over again and I'm getting tired of it
05:55 πŸ”— davidar_ Yes, clearly i was using the word "care" in technological sense...
05:56 πŸ”— davidar_ *in the
05:56 πŸ”— joepie91 davidar_: the problem is that you're not making an effort to understand the problem. rather, you're looking for ways in which you can declare that it *isn't* a problem.
05:56 πŸ”— joepie91 this doesn't help anybody
05:57 πŸ”— joepie91 I'm not here to try and convince you *that* it is a problem
05:57 πŸ”— joepie91 if that's how this discussion is going to go, then I'm just going to go sleep
05:57 πŸ”— joepie91 because I should have been asleep an hour ago
05:57 πŸ”— JesseW with regards to torrents of illegal material, I suspect that at least part of the psychological reason for people avoiding acting as seeds for rare material is that they are worried about being targeted, because there is less of a crowd to hide in
05:57 πŸ”— joepie91 the problem is there, it exists, and I have no problem explaining the details of it, but I'm not going to waste my time having a fruitless argument based on superficial interpretations
05:58 πŸ”— JesseW but I don't want to keep you awake when you'd be better asleep. The discussion will keep.
06:00 πŸ”— joepie91 night
06:01 πŸ”— JesseW 'gnight
06:02 πŸ”— bwn has joined #archiveteam-bs
06:06 πŸ”— metalcamp has joined #archiveteam-bs
06:06 πŸ”— JesseW hi bwn
06:07 πŸ”— bwn *waves* mm, comcast decided to lose it
06:09 πŸ”— JesseW lose what?
06:12 πŸ”— xmc our confidence in their ability to route packets
06:13 πŸ”— JesseW They've lost that a long time ago
06:14 πŸ”— JesseW Every time a packet goes through comcast, I'm surprised
06:14 πŸ”— Zebranky has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
06:15 πŸ”— Zebranky has joined #archiveteam-bs
06:17 πŸ”— bwn an angel gets its wings too
06:18 πŸ”— JesseW Yes, and *that's* what comcast uses to route packets -- angels!
06:19 πŸ”— JesseW How many packets can be routed by one angel?
06:21 πŸ”— yeoldetoa has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 258 seconds)
06:22 πŸ”— yeoldetoa has joined #archiveteam-bs
06:22 πŸ”— DoomTay 5?
06:22 πŸ”— espes__ has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
06:22 πŸ”— espes__ has joined #archiveteam-bs
06:23 πŸ”— bwn I think the archangels are enterprise ready and cloud certified
06:26 πŸ”— JesseW Hm, but are the thrones and dominions compatible with Azure and Bing?
06:27 πŸ”— JesseW btw, have you all seen http://kingjamesprogramming.tumblr.com/ ?
06:34 πŸ”— DoomTay I should read that sometime
06:36 πŸ”— JesseW It's quite entertaining
06:37 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
06:40 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
06:44 πŸ”— bwn these are great
06:46 πŸ”— SketchCow I am uploading.... a lot of stuff tonight
06:50 πŸ”— DoomTay What time is it over there?
06:50 πŸ”— pikhq_ 23:50
06:51 πŸ”— DoomTay Because it's past midnight here and the only reason I havne't gone to bed yet is because I'm waiting for some stuff to finish
06:53 πŸ”— SketchCow It's Jason time.
06:53 πŸ”— SketchCow It's always Jason time.
07:00 πŸ”— JesseW you are often uploading ... a lot of stuff. :-)
07:06 πŸ”— HCross2 Morning all :)
07:07 πŸ”— JesseW has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 370 seconds)
07:19 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
07:22 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
07:33 πŸ”— ndiddy has joined #archiveteam-bs
07:33 πŸ”— ndiddy has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
07:34 πŸ”— ravetcofx has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
07:40 πŸ”— ravetcofx has joined #archiveteam-bs
07:44 πŸ”— BlueMaxim has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
07:44 πŸ”— schbirid has joined #archiveteam-bs
07:44 πŸ”— BlueMaxim has joined #archiveteam-bs
08:12 πŸ”— RichardG has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
08:13 πŸ”— RichardG has joined #archiveteam-bs
08:17 πŸ”— DoomTay has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed)
08:22 πŸ”— bwn has quit IRC (Quit)
08:51 πŸ”— ravetcofx has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
09:01 πŸ”— ravetcofx has joined #archiveteam-bs
09:17 πŸ”— RichardG has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)
09:26 πŸ”— ravetcofx has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
09:41 πŸ”— ravetcofx has joined #archiveteam-bs
10:52 πŸ”— Fusl has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
10:59 πŸ”— BlueMaxim has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
11:32 πŸ”— Fusl has joined #archiveteam-bs
11:59 πŸ”— kristian_ has joined #archiveteam-bs
11:59 πŸ”— kristian_ :command MarkNonASCII /[^\x00-\x7F]
11:59 πŸ”— botpie91 kristian_: 10 Jun 11:32Z <joepie91> tell kristian_ that I was just passing on the message from bzc6p because I wasn't sure that it registered correctly
11:59 πŸ”— kristian_ joepie91, huh?
12:00 πŸ”— kristian_ anyway, I have what I just pasted in my vimrc ... but how do I make it ignore certain characters? Γ¦ ΓΈ Γ₯ Γ† Ø Γ… specifically ...
12:19 πŸ”— yipdw oh nice, AWS 2FA doesn't generate recovery codes
12:19 πŸ”— yipdw Stack Overflow answers recommend saving the 2FA secret or QR code "somewhere", nice
12:20 πŸ”— yipdw AWS: Why Would You Need That But Check Out This Scaling Thingy since 2006
12:26 πŸ”— kristian_ ah, sorry ... wrong channel for Vim questions :)
12:41 πŸ”— Atluxity :P
12:59 πŸ”— joepie91 kristian_: that was a very old message
12:59 πŸ”— kristian_ so it seems ... it does not ring a bell
12:59 πŸ”— kristian_ probably not important
13:00 πŸ”— ring has quit IRC (Quit: http://quassel-irc.org - Chat comfortably. Anywhere.)
13:25 πŸ”— kristian_ has quit IRC (Leaving)
13:59 πŸ”— phuzion has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection)
13:59 πŸ”— phuzion has joined #archiveteam-bs
14:29 πŸ”— Start has quit IRC (Quit: Disconnected.)
14:35 πŸ”— robink has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 633 seconds)
14:39 πŸ”— VADemon has joined #archiveteam-bs
14:43 πŸ”— anjacks0n has joined #archiveteam-bs
14:50 πŸ”— anjacks0n has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 190 seconds)
14:57 πŸ”— metal_cam has joined #archiveteam-bs
15:00 πŸ”— metalcamp has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
15:23 πŸ”— Aranje has joined #archiveteam-bs
15:24 πŸ”— ravetcofx has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
15:24 πŸ”— ravetcofx has joined #archiveteam-bs
15:37 πŸ”— kristian_ has joined #archiveteam-bs
15:44 πŸ”— JesseW has joined #archiveteam-bs
15:46 πŸ”— DoomTay has joined #archiveteam-bs
16:03 πŸ”— JesseW has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 370 seconds)
16:22 πŸ”— Start has joined #archiveteam-bs
16:42 πŸ”— schbirid has quit IRC (Quit: Leaving)
17:00 πŸ”— metal_cam is now known as metalcamp
17:06 πŸ”— godane SketchCow: i found out that your putting Da Vincis Demons into the Saturday Morning Cartoons
17:06 πŸ”— godane thats a Showtime tv show
17:08 πŸ”— godane https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Da_Vinci's_Demons
17:10 πŸ”— SketchCow I know
17:10 πŸ”— SketchCow Here's the deal
17:10 πŸ”— SketchCow People are using me, occasionally, as "Let's just dump all the shit on FOS"
17:10 πŸ”— SketchCow And now I am just trying to slam through as much of it as possible
17:10 πŸ”— SketchCow Then a round of refinement
17:10 πŸ”— SketchCow This was a pile, a massive, insane pile of shows
17:10 πŸ”— godane ok
17:11 πŸ”— godane good news is the show ended last year
17:11 πŸ”— HCross new UK prime minister has just arrived at Downing Street. Time for a round of new archiving
17:17 πŸ”— Kazzy welp, snoopers charter
17:20 πŸ”— JW_work has left
17:23 πŸ”— godane looks like i was the one that give you the N64 Cartridge Art Collection
17:28 πŸ”— VADemon has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
17:43 πŸ”— Start has quit IRC (Quit: Disconnected.)
17:44 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
17:45 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
18:01 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
18:04 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
18:11 πŸ”— metalcamp has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
18:13 πŸ”— metalcamp has joined #archiveteam-bs
18:27 πŸ”— Yoshimura has quit IRC (hub.efnet.us irc.umich.edu)
19:06 πŸ”— metal_cam has joined #archiveteam-bs
19:07 πŸ”— DoomTay has quit IRC (Quit: Page closed)
19:08 πŸ”— metalcamp has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
19:15 πŸ”— Yoshimura has joined #archiveteam-bs
19:15 πŸ”— metal_cam has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
19:15 πŸ”— RichardG has joined #archiveteam-bs
19:17 πŸ”— metalcamp has joined #archiveteam-bs
19:18 πŸ”— Yoshimura has quit IRC (http://www.kiwiirc.com/ - A hand crafted IRC client)
19:24 πŸ”— kristian_ has quit IRC (Leaving)
19:41 πŸ”— RichardG has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
19:41 πŸ”— RichardG has joined #archiveteam-bs
20:00 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
20:03 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
20:10 πŸ”— VADemon has joined #archiveteam-bs
20:38 πŸ”— bwn has joined #archiveteam-bs
20:45 πŸ”— Smiley has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
20:49 πŸ”— Smiley has joined #archiveteam-bs
20:51 πŸ”— bwn_ has joined #archiveteam-bs
20:51 πŸ”— bwn has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer)
20:54 πŸ”— bwn_ has quit IRC (Client Quit)
21:10 πŸ”— DoomTay has joined #archiveteam-bs
21:19 πŸ”— metalcamp has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 244 seconds)
21:23 πŸ”— ranma FOS?
21:25 πŸ”— xmc some computer thing
21:28 πŸ”— Igloo Futuristic Operating System
21:28 πŸ”— ranma man, there are some tv shows i want to upload somewhere
21:28 πŸ”— ranma like IA
21:28 πŸ”— xmc https://archive.org/upload/
21:28 πŸ”— ranma but i fear for my account
21:28 πŸ”— Igloo Create another one?
21:29 πŸ”— xmc make a new account just for that then
21:29 πŸ”— ranma heh
21:29 πŸ”— ranma TIL IA was hosting Future Crew's Metropolis album https://archive.org/details/futurecrew-metropolis
21:38 πŸ”— fie has joined #archiveteam-bs
21:42 πŸ”— VADemon has quit IRC (Quit: left4dead)
21:53 πŸ”— Start has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:01 πŸ”— Yoshimura has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:21 πŸ”— kristian_ has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:24 πŸ”— tomwsmf has joined #archiveteam-bs
22:55 πŸ”— DoomTay Think 7xpbnywkyokg6yfgta96panc9 should get the "nogravatar" ignoreset?
22:56 πŸ”— FalconK is it stuck doing nothing but gravatars?
22:58 πŸ”— DoomTay Not at the moment, no
23:02 πŸ”— ErkDog it says it's already done anyway...
23:06 πŸ”— yipdw fos means "fortress of solitude"
23:10 πŸ”— ErkDog LOL
23:17 πŸ”— xmc aka the timeout corner
23:22 πŸ”— Frogging ^
23:24 πŸ”— RedType has left
23:29 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
23:30 πŸ”— yipdw it's not a joke, it's the truth
23:32 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
23:39 πŸ”— dashcloud has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out)
23:45 πŸ”— dashcloud has joined #archiveteam-bs
23:50 πŸ”— bwn has joined #archiveteam-bs

irclogger-viewer