[00:16] alard: Let me know if you need to be put in touch with internal archive.org guys about the whole integration of WARC thing. [00:18] so I uploaded http://www.archive.org/details/UpcDatabase2003-02-13 but there seems to be no way to select a media type of "data" [00:19] There's sort of. [00:19] I can add it into the archiveteam collection, if you're fine with that. [00:20] I don't really care [00:20] That's the spirit [00:20] SketchCow: any chance you can put up that ls -laR somewhere? [00:21] http://www.archive.org/details/UpcDatabase2003-02-13 [00:22] I was gonna do the latest dump from upcdatabase.com but they've turned gay and stopped offering it [00:23] I still get the "you must pick a collection" screen [00:25] Add &recache=1 [00:26] tried that [00:27] Archive.org has some very interesting approaches to making stuff available... after a few minutes it really should work for you. I can tell you, from the inside, it's working. [00:27] Going to http://www.archive.org/details/archiveteam will show it. [00:27] weird now it works [00:27] thank you [00:49] http://forums.lostlevels.org/viewtopic.php?t=2582 [01:55] Is there any website that we can do our own private archive? [01:59] I found FreezePage, 10MB of space for archiving pages. Any alternative? [06:09] :( [06:10] Message from syslogd@celebdil at Jul 4 23:09:12 ... [06:10] kernel:[705409.276363] Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP [08:03] SketchCow: I don't know if you're around, but I have finished uploading a dataset of the (more or less complete) Friendster social graph. http://ia700601.us.archive.org/14/incoming/gv/friendster-dataset-201107/ [10:08] http://www.virusbtn.com/news/2011/07_05.xml?rss [11:05] Thank you, alard. [11:08] Hola SketchCow [11:17] http://www.archive.org/details/friendster-dataset-201107 [11:17] Seems not to be touched yet [11:22] SketchCow: Link doesn't work? [11:26] (I think the question should be how to turn the upload from blindtiger to an item on archive.org.) [12:01] Oh, I see what you did. [12:01] Holy crap, everything on blindtiger is web viewable! [12:03] It is, yes. :) [12:04] It's quite useful to see if your upload has arrived. But I can imagine that it may be not how it should be. [12:06] Shall I upload the files again through the archive.org submission form? Or is there a simple way to move it there? [12:07] I have a way. [12:07] I will do it. [12:07] It's f'in awesome. [12:15] 226 3.363 seconds (measured here), 12.87 Mbytes per second [12:15] 226-File successfully transferred [12:15] 45367345 bytes sent in 3.36 secs (13202.1 kB/s) [12:16] So yeah, I'll have it over. [12:16] I'm splitting groups and the rest. [12:40] http://www.archive.org/details/friendster-groups-201107 [13:07] http://www.archive.org/details/friendster-dataset-201107 [13:42] Table Talk being uploaded into archive.org now [13:58] That's great, thanks. I'll submit the links to some of the network / social computing data repositories. [14:30] http://www.archive.org/details/archiveteam-tabletalk-panic [14:30] Please download that if you want a copy [15:05] hey [15:06] SketchCow: do you knwo if you get prior access to the tapes of your defcon appearance? [15:12] his 198th defcon [15:13] That's pretty awesome. [18:07] alard: awesome work [19:05] closure: thanks! [20:04] Anyone know the link for the google groups repo? [20:04] github google gargler iirc [20:04] i mean [20:04] google github google gargler ;) [20:05] It's on launchpad, I know that [20:05] Google gargler was the one for the videos [20:06] oops [20:07] http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Google_Groups_Files [20:07] Aha [20:09] Or for increased speed through ipv6: https://gist.github.com/30cff29b602b818d018c [20:12] alard: ooh [20:15] ideally, all AT-related stuff would go here: https://github.com/ArchiveTeam/ [20:16] but google groups files isn't there [20:16] * underscor frowns at ndurner [20:16] :D [20:16] ndurner likes his bazaar. [20:17] Oh man, 14.8Mbps [20:17] MBps* [20:17] I'm loving it [20:18] :-) [20:18] ndurner: how are the quota? [20:19] a bit high [20:19] ... the load, not the quota ;-) [20:20] Ah. I've started a few instances this morning, now that my Friendster project has finished. [20:20] yes, I have seen it. thanks for coming back! [20:21] oh, and good work on the social graph! [20:22] Gah [20:23] Damn college blocks inbound IMCP [20:23] ICMP* [20:23] And he.net won't allow you to set up an endpoint if they can't ping you [20:24] "for security!" [20:24] We need to establish JSON-based pings [20:24] and for broken shit [20:25] Yeah, apparently blocking ICMP is "secure" [20:25] Even though it breaks the internet [20:25] Well. not really "breaks" [20:25] But still [20:25] have I complained today about the crappy 2wire devices at&t insists on using [20:25] Not yet [20:25] but they're shit [20:25] You're preaching to the choir [20:26] (sure, you can escape them for plain DSL, but for U-Verse, you HAVE to use it, due to the 802.1X) [20:26] I can't traceroute from home because the stupid piece of shit doesn't know what to do with ICMP timeout notifications [20:27] haha [20:27] (funny... I had that problem with a cisco ISDN router at one point, but linux has no problem) [20:28] i would love it if I could set the thing to bridge-only and do pppoe or whatever on the linux box itself [20:29] Coderjoe: That'd be nice [20:29] ndurner: D: [20:29] --2011-07-05 16:28:55-- http://archiveteamorg.appspot.com/getgrp [20:29] 2011-07-05 16:28:55 ERROR 404: Not Found. [20:29] Connecting to archiveteamorg.appspot.com|72.14.204.141|:80... connected. [20:29] HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found [20:29] Resolving archiveteamorg.appspot.com... 72.14.204.141 [20:29] Error downloading group names [20:29] Error, waiting 4 seconds... [20:30] * ndurner nods [20:30] and if you have a business UVerse Internet account with multiple static IPs, don't even TRY assigning them to the same mac address... it REQUIRES the use of DHCP [20:30] hahaha [20:30] fun fun fun [20:30] if the system didn't do a DHCP request, the thing assumes the system is down [20:33] Yay, it works now, ndurner [20:33] it's back [20:40] ndurner: What does 501 Not Implemented mean? Did I break something? [20:40] Also, do I need to update to revision 23 from rev 21 if I only do discovery? [20:40] soultcer: no, it's actually 501: Internal Server Error: throttled [20:41] r21 is fine [20:41] http://washingtondc.craigslist.org/mld/sys/2478539974.html [20:41] Sata/IDE? [20:41] How does that work? [20:42] I could see that for confusion about power plugs [20:43] (several earlier SATA drives took either SATA power or regular 4pin) [20:43] but those are straight up PATA [20:43] perhaps he's confused about the jumper block? [20:43] or just trying to show up in more search results [20:48] Anyone interested in splitting a server 4 ways? [20:48] Bill is due sorta soon, and the other guy I was sharing it with bailed [20:49] and I'm having a hard time coming up with my half, let alone all of it [20:49] underscor: Sounds interesting, how does that work? [20:49] It's 4x2TB drives, 20TB of gbit bandwidth [20:49] 4GB RAM [20:49] soultcer: Uh, paypal, check, or concealed cash works for me [20:49] (I have to pay by wire) [20:50] (to the server company_ [20:50] )* [20:51] So each share is "1 GB of ram, 0,5 TB HDD (assuming RAID), 5 TB traffic"? How much do you pay for one share? [20:51] where is this? [20:51] euserv.de [20:51] soultcer: Basically [20:51] It's not rigidly separated hough [20:51] though* [20:51] I mean, it's just one debian system, with equally shared root access [20:52] ah [20:52] If I can get 3 other people, it's $50 a month/person [20:52] They allow bittorrent too, just as an aside [20:52] 20TB / ( 1Gbit/s) is approx. 1.851851852 days. [20:52] >_< [20:52] Coderjoe: I've used up to 60TB on that server [20:52] and not been ratelimited [20:52] So I think they secretly don't care [20:53] It's supposed to be 20TB of Gbit, then you get 10 more TB at 100Mbit, then unlimited 10Mbit [20:53] underscor: Check out http://kvm-hosting.org/ btw, it's a similar model, some people sharing a server, but split via virtualisation [20:53] soultcer: Yeah, I've a few virtual servers [20:53] I like bare metal though [20:55] KVM is pretty darn fast if you only have 4 virtualized machines running, and if you don't really know how to set it up I can recommend Proxmox, a debian-based virtual machine hosting system [20:56] oic [20:57] Do you have the "Filer L"? Do they offer IPv6 and/or multiple IPv4? [20:58] No native IPv6 support yet, but I've been pushing a good 4 or 5 TB with hurricane electric from it [20:58] It comes with a /29 [20:58] And yeah, it's the filer L [20:58] Oh, apparently they do offer IPv6 now [20:58] I see it on the page [20:58] Would have been nice if they had emailed me [20:58] lol [20:59] More IPv4 IPs are only 1 EUR/Month [21:04] does anyone know of a good, free DNS host? something like MyBind? [21:05] i am the worst git user ever [21:05] lol, what? you don't GIT it? [21:05] * underscor groans [21:06] Dinner time :V [21:06] "i fixed it" [21:06] "oops, a private path from my local machine" [21:06] "fixed" [21:06] "oops wait i did something else" [21:06] I have to say, the campus cafeteria is absolutely magnificent [21:06] "now it is really fixed" [21:06] Cowering: Did you try xname.org or he.net dns hosting? [21:16] underscor: which server? or is it custom? [21:17] my deutch is weak [21:18] Coderjoe: The Filer L: https://ssl.euserv.de/produkte/server/rootserver/filer-2011/filer_l_giga_2011.php [21:18] * filer does not endorse that product [21:19] aha [21:19] I tried looking at their UK page for english, which failed. the uk site has different servers [21:20] filer: Haha, why not? it has losts of diskspace for archiving and a kick-ass name ;-) [21:20] would be the Giga version for gigabit internets, if their limiting is working properly [21:21] no endorsement deal till I get free samples [21:25] Netzwerk + Traffic [21:25] [21:25] 1x 100Mbit/s [21:25] Netzwerkanbindung [21:25] Traffic inklusive Â¹ [21:25] garantierte Bandbreite 100Mbit/s Â¹ [21:25] RZ-interner Traffic kostenfrei [21:25] alternativ gegen Aufpreis: [21:25] "Filer L Giga" mit 1Gbit/s [21:25] underscor has the Gigabit version [21:26] which is 30EUR more expensive >_< [21:27] But has Gigabit speeds! Archiving with Gigabit speeds, fuck yeah [21:28] if the quoted prices were the same digits but in USD, then fuck yeah I would get one [21:28] but even the 100mbit one is a little pricy :( [21:47] In case there's anyone with wiki-admin-powers online: a certain Joeyboi has posted a valuable contribution about loan modification to the WikiTeam page. [21:47] Coderjoe: It's only a 1/4 of the price, though [21:47] If I can find two others who are interested [21:49] Did you already order the server? [21:49] I've had it for like 7 months now [21:49] i meant for it all to myself [21:49] Coderjoe: oic [21:50] soultcer: The previous person couldn't afford their portion, and I can't afford the whole thing [21:55] http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=File:This_Will_Only_Hurt_a_Bit.jpg O_O [21:55] haha [22:44] o_O [22:46] underscor: I still don't understand that plan [22:47] underscor: 8TB of disk space isn't a whole lot when you can download that fast [23:09] db48x: we need hvd discs bad [23:09] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_Versatile_Disc [23:15] or something [23:17] http://newscenter.lbl.gov/feature-stories/2009/06/03/billion-year-ultra-dense-memory-chip/ [23:35] underscor: you actually went ahead with the server plan?