Time |
Nickname |
Message |
00:38
🔗
|
chronomex |
underscor: you're interning at archive.org? awesome! |
00:39
🔗
|
underscor |
Yep :D |
00:39
🔗
|
* |
underscor is so excited |
00:44
🔗
|
chronomex |
are you going to sf for that? |
01:49
🔗
|
underscor |
chronomex: yeah, 2 weeks starting monday |
01:49
🔗
|
underscor |
(in like 3 days) |
02:10
🔗
|
dashcloud |
congrats underscor |
02:13
🔗
|
underscor |
thabkd |
02:13
🔗
|
underscor |
er, thanks |
02:14
🔗
|
dashcloud |
so will you be working on the same team/department as SketchCow ? |
11:43
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
wow. crazy |
11:44
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
this 3.5 inch drive has no high density detect switch |
11:45
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
though i suppose since the difference between hd and dd is sectors per track, it isn't needed if your controller is smart enough |
11:50
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
haha |
11:50
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
5V DC 1.44A |
11:56
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
hmm |
11:57
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
this other drive with less smarts seems to have done a better job of reading this troublesome disk |
12:05
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
i should probably take it in to the office and check the track alignment |
12:14
🔗
|
ats |
Coderjoe: does it use half as much current if you insert a double-density disk? |
12:50
🔗
|
alard |
underscor: thanks for your wget-warc bug report, but I think it's not a warc-specific problem (see https://github.com/alard/wget-warc/issues/13) |
12:50
🔗
|
alard |
db48x2: re extra metadata for wget-warc: see https://github.com/alard/wget-warc/issues/14 |
13:36
🔗
|
ats |
alard: yeah, regular wget uses lots of memory on big hierachies too |
15:46
🔗
|
w4r3zh4ck |
can somebody ban this user JackSavage ? He is spamming http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges |
17:11
🔗
|
chronomex |
what just happened? |
17:11
🔗
|
chronomex |
04:44:11 Coderjoe this 3.5 inch drive has no high density detect switch |
17:11
🔗
|
chronomex |
Coderjoe: I have a 2.88M drive somewhere if you find such a diskette |
17:50
🔗
|
Coderjoe |
chronomex: I have another drive that has two switches on each side, but is not an ED drive. just part count reduction. the second switch isn't connected to anything. |
23:28
🔗
|
chronomex |
hmmm interesting |
23:55
🔗
|
chronomex |
lemonkey: what is going on? |