[00:23] argh. [00:23] such a pain in the ass to find anything on youtube that you may have stumbled upon before, but is long gone from your history [00:26] yea, especially if all you can remember is a color, mood, effect, etc [00:27] not quite limited to youtube though [00:27] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhEBPgr6-Bs [00:27] O_o [00:28] db48x: well, I remember what I think was the title of the video. but knowing the title is worthless with youtube's search feature on heavilly-used words [00:36] also half the time the video is actually not there anymore [00:40] I just download every youtube vid I watch into my archive. (Don't watch many tho.) [00:40] for anyone that cares, rob malda of slashdot fame's city of Dexter was hit by a F2 tornado just outside of ann arbor michigan with F4/F5 damage reported just over an hour ago - he was one of the lucky ones. [00:41] I had not heard.. glad he's ok. (Ex cow-orker of mine) [00:56] which is it? F2 (do you mean EF2?) or F4/F5 (do you mean EF4/EF5?)? Also, tornadoes are rated by the damage done, and generally are not really classed until a damage survey is done. [00:58] wow [00:58] sudden outbreak [01:00] yow. that velocity imagery looks bad [01:04] tonado season is not even begun is it? [01:04] more like 3 hours ago [01:04] I had a close call last week, actually heard a storm 10 miles from me that indeed flattened several houses [01:04] closure: technically, not really, at least not in michigan. we're getting some early stuff with the early unseasonably warm stuff [01:05] This is in VA, which doesn't really have a tornado season as such, normally [01:11] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEJT6jEEqAg [01:47] pictures: http://interactives.woodtv.com/photomojo/gallery/2247/7/tornado-touches-down-in-dexter/emergency-crews-respond-to-tornado-damage/ [01:52] Coderjoe, yes, EF, sorry... some chopper footage i saw showed some houses completely leveled. [06:38] Coderjoe: I usually ./youtube-dl most youtube videos I watch [06:38] THen I have both the video and what it's ID is [06:43] I do that out of necessity, as I don't have flash installed [06:44] most youtube videos work with html5 now [06:45] I prefer mplayer anyway [06:45] chronomex: have you tried gnash? [06:45] mplayer does rock [06:45] arrith: no, I don't care, I like my way. [06:45] I have a shellscript that I can pass a list of urls and it'll play them in order [06:46] even pauses music I have playing [06:46] extra step of downloading then opening to watch is mroe than just clicking on a link and having it play [06:46] sure, I don't care though. [06:49] alright [06:50] i really don't like flash but there's so much that uses it [06:50] so gnash getting really good would be good for me [06:50] if I really want to, I have flash in chrome. [06:51] mmm [06:51] so much fun [06:51] pulling data off a 2TB drive at an average speed of 1166 kiB/s [06:51] shrug [06:52] (I am pretty sure the drive is not in the best of health. reallocated sector count is already high enough to trip the FAILING status) [06:52] heh [06:54] the owner of the drive pulled it out of a WD NAS box that supposedly failed, and supposedly only had one drive in it. [06:54] supposedly? [06:55] (I strongly suspect there were two, since this drive has four partitions that are all one of two devices in a RAID1 mirror set) [06:55] ah [06:55] are you able to read anything useful from the drive like that? [06:56] yes [06:56] since it was mirroring, in theory, each half has a full copy of the data [06:56] but I am taking an image of the whole drive (hence the long 15-day read time) before I poke too much more deeply [06:57] oh, right [06:57] you did say mirror [06:57] two of the partitions have ext3 filesystems with system stuff on them, one is a swap space, and the last (and by far largest) is an xfs filesystem [06:57] and that xfs filesystem has a journal to replay. which is why I want to take an image before poking it [06:58] well, that and the drive taking forever to read [07:27] http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4989933629762859961 [07:28] 30:21 [07:28] Computer Networks - The Heralds of Resource Sharing [07:28] 70s vid about early networking of computers [14:11] Yeah. [14:12] Mentioned here a lot, made by my film teacher [14:31] I hate coming in and seeing the last few lines of an obviously long conversation goodnight. [18:22] SketchCow: hmm, I have the TAL ep somewhere [18:24] http://kitenet.net/~joey/tmp/220__#454__Mr._Daisey_and_the_Apple_Factory.mp3 [18:24] actually, http://kitenet.net/~joey/tmp/Mr._Daisey_and_the_Apple_Factory.mp3 [18:34] damn beat me to it [18:34] did they actually take the mp3 down? seems excessive [18:35] put a 1 minute retraction at the top of it [18:35] (git annex get is fast ... [18:35] ;) [18:37] https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:0129IR74vb0J:www.thisamericanlife.org/radio-archives/episode/454/mr-daisey-and-the-apple-factory+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&client=firefox-a [18:39] explanation https://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/03/16/148761812/this-american-life-retracts-mike-daiseys-apple-factory-story [18:40] lolâ¦ "My show is a theatrical piece " â¦ "He adds that what he does is "not journalism"" â¦ seriouslyâ¦ [21:13] http://tech.li/2012/03/why-users-dont-and-shouldnt-trust-startups/ [21:51] man... if you're going to try and protest something and have some activism thing to open eyes, you should not fabricate details, even if similar events to what you described had happened. Such as claiming you spoke to workers involved in some event when you never have. Changing names and stuff like that is ok. but this just undermines the credibility of your message. even if you're doing something theatrical that is s [21:51] till attempting to raise some awareness. [21:53] Even if he's generally right, nobody will take his message seriously now [21:54] "He asked Lee about Daisey met underage workers, she said no." [21:55] It kinda bugs me when a published piece of professional journalism has incorrect spelling or bad grammar. [21:56] Coderjoe: Was that in native English, or piped through a translator? [21:56] I was quoting a non-quotation from the article [21:56] Gotcha [21:57] so it was written entirely by the author of the article [21:57] I thought it was machine translated when I saw it, but yeah, it's just bad writing [22:05] * shaqfu ponders asking his old boss if he grabbed the network logs used in today's trial... [22:07] Although it would literall be 70+ years before anyone could touch them