[00:10] heh, but so much harder to find (unless one wants to spend much more) [00:10] my poor eSATA port feels lonely [00:11] And it's so silly that it can't give power. [00:13] Sigh, http://www.us.archive.org/log_show.php?task_id=98826597&full=1 is at its 4th failure already. [00:17] Definition of insanity for $200, alex [00:21] This word, also known as a common curse word, is generally used a lot in IT. [00:32] hah. "VD is for Everybody" is again featured as "Curator's Choice" on the ia front page [01:38] arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/03/isp-storing-25-petabytes-of-megaupload-data-costs-us-9000-a-day.ars somewhat interesting article about MU [01:57] yes I posted that 6 hours ago [02:01] WOO HOO [02:01] Great, I can't drop my Raylight AVI files into Vegas 11, yet. [02:35] There is a chance I never will! [02:35] That is VERY DEPRESSING [02:35] I am literally looking at a reduced lifetime of my video shot for GET LAMP [02:35] Because I had to go with this crazy fuckstick thing [02:35] Now, luckily, I have the RAW footage fine. [02:36] But I means I have to set a machine aside in another room, doing nothing but rendering [02:37] does Vegas support rendering on GPU? [02:38] what is Raylight? I thought I was pretty clued in on video codecs and such, but I've never heard of that one before [02:46] no hits on multimediawiki or ffmpeg.org, damn that is some crazy fuckstick shit there [02:49] my wild guess would be some intermediate codec like cineform [02:52] A long time ago, Panasonic and Sony wouldn't agree on making a codec for Sony Vegas. [02:53] Panasonic wanted money, Sony wanted to rape a kitten and deposit the body in Panasonic's mouth [02:53] But here I was, shooting MXF files, and I wanted to edit them in Vegas [02:53] So I got a program called Raylight, which makes MXF files work in Vegas. [02:54] As an option, you can render out self-contained AVIs, which is what I have. 3,000 of them. [02:54] Or 4,000, something big [02:54] yay for third parties [02:54] Anyway, as Sony would update Vegas, Raylight would stop working [02:54] So they'd make a new raylight [02:54] And so on [02:54] Apparently, though, 32 bit vegas doesn't work. [02:54] I mean 64 [02:57] can you put up a sample? (or at least the fourCC of the file) [02:57] you can install a 32-bit os in virtualbox, there'll be some speed hit but for asspounder9k it shouldn't be too bad [02:58] And I'd imagine it limits the RAM you can use. [02:58] true [02:59] even better- Windows 7 Pro and up come up with an XP Pro virtual machine- you can probably just use that- if you don't want to reinstall [02:59] or am I thinking of a different feature? [03:00] yeah that might work too [03:01] you could use MS's VHD tool to convert your physical machine into a virtual one, or VMware has a nice converter you can use- not sure if Virtualbox has its own yet [03:03] Oh god no [03:03] Dude, I only have one face to shoot [03:04] I'm going to install a second 32-bit of sony vegas, see if it works [03:05] is there a live install to vm converter for ubuntu as well, that sounds really useful [03:05] http://dvfilm.com/raylight/ [03:05] whee [03:07] huh [03:07] Supports the newest Sony Vegas Pro 11! [03:13] you may be in luck: Raylight Avi's are currently not supported in 64-bit software. They can be used with 32-bit software on a 64-bit OS [03:13] from Raylight's site [03:14] i kinda would like to get ahold of a small sample to add to the samples archive and potentially have REd [03:16] 32 bit vegas won't be able to access >4gb ram though, will it? [03:17] Coderjoe: look here- http://dvfilm.com/raylight/ultra/index.htm [03:17] if just converting the footage from one format to another, would it need that much ram? [03:17] According to su, no [03:17] http://superuser.com/questions/69480/application-cannot-access-more-than-4-gb-on-64-bit-processor [03:17] there's a click here to download a sample, but it's not their AVI export- just the original [03:42] Yep [03:42] 32 Bit Version works [03:42] I installed it, it works [03:42] Thanks for being insane [03:49] SketchCow: It's much more fun to convert the current system to a virtualized one running on esxi and stuff though [03:49] hahahaha [04:02] underscor: why would you want to do that on a desktop system? [04:02] Coderjoe: Someone suggested it earlier [04:02] I was being facetious [04:02] :) [04:20] http://thewikireader.com/features/ [04:21] Because less is always more. ALWAYS. [04:22] on sale for $30 on amazon [04:22] http://www.amazon.com/Pandigital-Handheld-Electronic-Encyclopedia-WikiReader/dp/B0039NLVB2 [04:23] that would be so useful in third world countries [04:23] kennethre: Damn [04:23] That's cool [04:23] those have been around for a while [04:23] A stable, growing economy would be more useful to a third world country :P [04:24] aggro1: that costs more than $29 :P [05:28] good day [05:28] greetings [05:30] we got to keep pushing the speed of http://memac.heroku.com [05:31] good idea [05:36] other question: do you guys know of a solution to create tables better than in mediawiki? [05:38] like a collaborative/wiki version of excel or a databasemanagment software? [05:38] I guess google docs? [05:40] jonas_: mysql [05:46] saved forever http://www.archive.org/download/cdrom-nf-archive-three-v1.0/nf_archive_three_v1.0.iso/PARTIES%2F1997%2FSILICON.97%2FPHOTOS%2FDRUNKEN_HONK.JPG [05:48] jonas_ editgrid [05:48] Oh, damn [05:48] editgrid is amazing [05:48] It handled the 14,000 row CSV I threw at it like a beast [05:48] better than googledocs did [05:50] ....yeah, but is there anything which comes close to a "wiki-dbms" for it, allowing 10 people at the same time to work on tables as well as database structure? [05:51] jonas_ editgrid [05:51] Oh, damn [05:51] editgrid is amazing [05:51] It handled the 14,000 row CSV I threw at it like a beast [05:51] better than googledocs did [05:51] it's collaborative too [05:51] but it's just a spreadsheet [05:52] not a database [05:52] wow, I was just about to do that, underscor. that would have been awkward. :) [05:52] :) [05:53] great! let me try that one:) [05:54] Tables: excel --> spreadsheets.google --> mediawiki [05:54] Databases: access --> php-my-admin --> ??? [05:54] --> = more collaborative but more limited [05:54] but what we are looking for ultimately of course is something as collaborative as mediawiki and as powerful as e.g. access [05:55] :) [05:55] I dunno, sorry :) [05:55] It sounds neat though! [10:05] lol [10:05] [Feb 10 12 03:49] too bad amazon doesn't just front an s3 bill for IA [18:18] mobileme-hero-9999z [18:18] > Date: February 18, 2012 10:57:10 AM EST [18:18] > From: Ken Gagne [18:18] > Subject: Computerworld Shark Bait [18:18] > To: archiveteam@archiveteam.org [18:18] > [18:19] > This user forum, which was set to a read-only state a year ago, will be deleted in the coming month: [18:19] > [18:19] > http://sharkbait.computerworld.com/ [18:55] Running Heritrix on the sharkbait forum. [19:00] I'm exploding machines left and right [19:02] With these mobileme uploads. [19:02] But I'm assured it's not a big deal. [19:03] Storm is currently over for fos, at least for now. [19:18] hmm, i need to spin a few of those up [19:28] You need to be shoving them direcly into archive.org. [19:29] i haven't run any in like a month [19:29] Yeah. [19:29] But you should, and definitely shove them right into archive.org, which alard can help with [19:36] I get some sort of weird bliss after doing a bunch of operations on the computer without touching the mouse [19:37] off-topic blather for today [20:07] my wget-warc can't make the .gz files [20:07] Could not open WARC file. [20:07] Error opening GZIP stream to WARC file. [20:07] Error writing warcinfo record to WARC file. [20:08] godane: Disk full? [20:08] no [20:08] i have 90gb of space [20:10] It's probably something like that. Permissions, wrong path etc. [20:10] Have you tried wget --warc-file=test http://www.archive.org/ [20:12] some error [20:12] *same errror [20:14] nevermind [20:14] i was using a older version [20:14] 2567-dirtly [20:15] kennethre: The memac s3 scripts haven't changed since last time. [20:16] (That is to say: the boot script hasn't changed. The script itself now produces 5GB files.) [22:18] alard: so does the tamer cause the s3 instances to hold for awhile before being given an OK with an IA item id? [22:19] (in order to tame the push into IA) [22:31] Coderjoe: Yes, it can limit the number of downloaders and the number of uploaders. The instances waits until they get an upload slot. [22:31] *wait [22:32] But the upload limit is set to 50, so at the moment there's no pause.