[00:45] So, big data purge by Facebook today [00:45] what're they deleting? [00:45] Any account with "cosplay" in the name seems to have been hosed [00:45] weird. [00:45] facebook hates fun, as usual [00:47] They were pissed that people were using multiple accounts [00:47] Guess they're serious about "you are your Facebook" [00:49] Cosplayers tend to have big accounts, byte-wise; wonder what the loss was [00:49] wonder how they feel about all the high school teachers who have two accounts [00:50] Dunno; that's harder to track [01:15] if you are on Windows, don't forget that tab completion is available [02:19] How goes Cinch? [02:36] S[h]O[r]T was trying to beat me >:( [02:36] luckily I nipped that in the bud [02:47] I'm not surprised by the FB data purge. I saw a number of comments all over the place about FB's proclaimed user count being much higher than reality [02:47] (And I know a few people that had multiple accounts. not sure how they fared) [03:06] Coderjoe: The suck part is that every account, was a human being [03:06] It's not like a bot purge [03:06] yeah :( [03:07] And I doubt FB was oblivious to that [03:07] too much trying to limit people to one online presence per meatbag [03:07] THIS COSPLAY BOTNET IS A REAL MENACE [03:35] Nintendo Power is to stop being published... :( [03:49] damit wtf [03:49] more items? [03:49] i should ahve kept all my threads running lol [03:51] well not running warrior so would have had to update my stuff [03:51] dam u underscor! [03:52] hmm i ran a git pull and now getting errors :( [03:54] TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 3 arguments (4 given) [03:58] oops missed the line about pip update [03:58] all fixed [04:03] well now im getting tracebacks ERROR:root:Error in periodic callback [04:03] AttributeError: 'AsyncPopen' object has no attribute 'pipe' [04:04] cant uploadit seems, doh [04:12] maybe i was running too many but it worked before. i might have taken a good amount of ids and not uploaded anything alard. sorry :( [06:33] #cinch #winning [06:36] * BlueMax hates underscor [06:36] and his big pipe. [06:37] :D [06:37] https://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/559140_481985518478508_1351707243_n.jpg [06:37] dammit [06:37] oh, that was for -bs [06:47] woop woop woop off-topic siren [06:47] gtfo [07:12] Warning, Nintendo Power mag maybe shutting down [07:13] they are [09:17] Since we have the -bs policy to prevent "spam" in here, maybe it's about time we permanently ban the bots that keep joining and parting all the time? [09:18] ban all you want [09:18] I've got joins & parts ignored in here [09:18] Oh right, I'm op [09:19] Still, thought I'd ask first [09:33] banning bots is pretty much pointless. They only use the same IP once or twice. [09:34] most of the join/part traffic is actual people's clients [09:35] /ban *!*@*.net [09:35] mission accomplished [09:57] Coderjoe: These are bots that I don\t know the purpose of, which have been using the same, fake vhosts forever [09:58] tidalwave [tidalwave@170-201.82-139.bia.tkbb.net.pl] for example [09:59] Diagnose: vhost doesn't look up, ctcp version returns bitchs [09:59] *x [10:13] nitro2k01: bitchx is a client though. Why do you assume that's a bot? [10:25] ersi: 1) A number of clients join and part repeatedly 2) never say anything 3) never respond to PMs 4) all have fake vhosts (that don't look up to a real IP address) 5) all return exactly the same CTCP version [10:26] How could this not be bots? [10:26] vhosts on irc are nothing one can care about [10:26] I dunno, but there's plenty of lurkers here. Also, LOL at taking any kind of information as valid, like vhosts [10:27] I take facts into consideration and draw conclusions [10:27] Yeah, but what's the freggin' problem. Are they spamming? Are they doing anything? [10:27] And, again, they spam #archiveteam and other channels with join and part notices [10:28] * ersi rolls eyes and goes for lunch [10:39] * SmileyG ignores joins and parts. [10:39] :) [17:20] nitro2k01: if you think it is a problem, fix it - you have @ for a reason [17:20] I like to extend wikipedia's "be bold" principle to irc. [17:40] * unwhan is not a bot, sockpuppet nor human bug [17:41] however thinks that a ban on unreasonable idling would be ok [17:45] Unreasonable idling, haha. :) "ArchiveTeam - stationnement gênant", don't lurk, we'll ban you if you don't talk. [17:45] :)) [17:47] In other news: we should start wayback.archiveteam.org. [17:47] Make mobileme, picplz, tabblo etc. available. [17:50] wayback.archiveteam.org would be nice. [19:07] uh [19:07] no, not a ban on idling [19:07] I _hate_ bans on idling [19:07] ^ [19:08] lurk moar [19:08] there was one channel I wanted to participate in that I lasted less than a week in simply because they had the stupid policy of "you're only in the channel when you're actually at your computer" [19:09] (iirc, it was also on efnet. and it was related to funny music) [19:09] i suspect they didn't know how to manage ops properly [20:34] addchans SketchCow #archiveteam [20:37] alard: that would be pretty cool [20:38] although I don't know how well the wayback machine plays with remote warcs out-of-the-box [20:38] (the production code is different than what's been released) [20:38] I don't think it's too hard to get it running. [20:39] A little modification to the code to get it to recognize warc-in-tar. [20:39] But then it's just a range request, right? [20:54] underscor: I just browsed a bit through the wayback machine code at https://github.com/internetarchive/wayback/ . All the remote warc stuff seems to be there (and I'll just assume that it isn't broken). [20:54] ah, okay [20:56] So that looks promising. We should probably turn to SketchCow for hosting. [20:56] of course, warc-in-tar via range request would only really work with a non-compressed tar fil [20:57] He probably wouldn't want that on an archive.org server, otherwise I'd offer one of my boxen [20:57] Yes. But then you shouldn't compress tars-with-warcs (or, perhaps even worse, put the warcs in a zip file). [20:58] (cc: SketchCow) [20:58] Most of the stuff isn't compressed, by the way. [20:58] alard: warc-in-zip is easier to extract from the middle of, since it's not a solid archive [21:00] Ah, probably. But uncompressed is even better. [21:01] yes [21:04] Even more so since the wayback thing would be interested in a single warc record from a larger warc file. [21:38] anyone have good ties to oracle? especially to web/ftp admins? [21:44] OKAY SO THAT WAS A LOT OF ME WHATEVER OKAYFLKSDHFJKLDHFDf [21:50] hey SketchCow [21:51] i'm uploading the computer programme [21:57] I see that. [21:57] I'll be making your collections soon [22:00] gamesmaster is very big [22:37] wasn't the plan to put all this stuff in the real wayback machine [22:37] SketchCow, what's it like having a slave :P [22:37] correct [22:52] 2 [22:52] THIS IS MY SLAVE THERE ARE MANY OTHERS LIKE HIM BUT THIS ONE IS MINE