#archiveteam 2013-03-13,Wed

↑back Search

Time Nickname Message
00:25 πŸ”— SketchCow alard: Around?
00:27 πŸ”— godane SketchCow: i uploaded the g4 forums
00:28 πŸ”— SketchCow Thanks
00:28 πŸ”— godane i still have to get images and everything
00:29 πŸ”— godane there is also the hided forums that i'm grabing
00:37 πŸ”— SketchCow Someone help me.
00:37 πŸ”— SketchCow Why did we decide to go after xanga again?
00:40 πŸ”— ersi Haha
00:40 πŸ”— ersi Good question. Lots of data/small files?
00:40 πŸ”— SketchCow I'm just wondering. We got 3 terabytes in on it.
00:40 πŸ”— SketchCow I'm now uploading those.
00:40 πŸ”— SketchCow I mean, they're perfectly fine grabs.
00:40 πŸ”— SketchCow But I know we paused. Maybe because we didn't need it or something else?
00:41 πŸ”— SketchCow Regardless, 3tb on FOS undermines our ability to be reactive to other horseshit
00:41 πŸ”— SketchCow So I'm emptying FOS of everything I can
00:41 πŸ”— ersi Hmm, wasn't it a proof of concept? I can't remember unfortunally.
00:41 πŸ”— SketchCow We got 3tb into a proof of concept?
00:41 πŸ”— SketchCow We're crazy
00:42 πŸ”— ersi We're crazy.
00:42 πŸ”— ersi Because fuck you, that's why
00:42 πŸ”— ersi :-)
00:42 πŸ”— SketchCow http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/318/627/9b0.jpg
00:43 πŸ”— ersi bwahaha
00:43 πŸ”— ersi Xanga doesn't seem dead, so.. That's great I guess.
00:45 πŸ”— SketchCow Yeah, no idea what was up.
00:51 πŸ”— godane my cat did that when he was younger
00:52 πŸ”— godane he got mad at the paper towel roll on the table
00:52 πŸ”— godane then we find it every where on the floor the next morring
00:54 πŸ”— godane ADD Moment: one of the g4 forum members died
00:54 πŸ”— godane a user named Loki
02:01 πŸ”— omf_ We have more than one ongoing project. http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Current_Projects
02:05 πŸ”— plux_ omf_ well, planning to set up a permament warrior as soon I get my new serverparts. :)
02:07 πŸ”— omf_ plux_, that is good to hear. We also have long term projects like urlteam as well
02:08 πŸ”— omf_ ArchiveTeam has a simple goal but many avenues to it
03:28 πŸ”— arkhive plux_: seems like a good idea to work on posterous http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Posterous#Goal
03:33 πŸ”— chronomex anyone here have some experience with https://github.com/internetarchive/warc ?
03:34 πŸ”— plux_ arkhive: well, yes. That why I have a warrior working on that.
05:02 πŸ”— chronomex this is complicated.
05:04 πŸ”— omf_ chronomex, what are trying to do to a warc?
05:04 πŸ”— chronomex write a warc from a collection of python HTTPResponse objects
05:05 πŸ”— chronomex I'm having trouble composing the appropriate things in warc.py
05:19 πŸ”— * chronomex shrugs
05:19 πŸ”— chronomex going to work on this later, no more today
05:43 πŸ”— arkhive Odd question: For the Posterous archive project, why not download the spam accounts? It's all a part of the community. Shouldn't we save that too? Might sound stupid, but i think it's a question worth raising. Thoughts?
05:44 πŸ”— arkhive And I guess that goes to all websites we save. Too me it's different then a spam/junk email. I don't know...
05:45 πŸ”— Cameron_D at they moment they are being downloaded
05:45 πŸ”— arkhive And also not only the spam accounts, but the banned ones as well. (If they are accessible)
05:45 πŸ”— Cameron_D banned ones aren't accessible (they are jsut blank pages)
05:46 πŸ”— Cameron_D the problem is that there are so many spam accounts and we're spending time downloading them, priority should be given to users with actual posts
05:46 πŸ”— arkhive Oh. Will the spam ones be deleted before setting up a mirror or place to put them?
05:47 πŸ”— Cameron_D probably not, too hard to sort/filter them
05:55 πŸ”— arkhive Oh
05:56 πŸ”— chronomex we'd like to download non-spam first
05:56 πŸ”— chronomex obviously
05:56 πŸ”— chronomex it's hard to sort them by spamminess given that we only have a list of namse
06:02 πŸ”— omf_ chronomex, are you writing a python spider with warc support?
06:02 πŸ”— chronomex I'm writing a http proxy that dribbles everything to warc
06:02 πŸ”— chronomex for personal use
06:02 πŸ”— chronomex intend to publish
06:05 πŸ”— omf_ chronomex, wouldn't it be faster to just write a plugin for squid to dump the cache at intervals to warc? All the heavy lifting is already done
06:05 πŸ”— chronomex heavy lifting in this case means what, exactly?
06:06 πŸ”— chronomex also warc kind of requires virgin request/responses, and I suspect that "cached" has been munged
06:11 πŸ”— omf_ well lets see. There is handling requests from multiple users, cache checking, purging and locking. Smart url redirection management etc.. How are you going to do cache locking when a page is out of date but current being requested by users
06:11 πŸ”— chronomex users in this case == myself
06:11 πŸ”— chronomex no caching, just a straight passthrough
06:12 πŸ”— chronomex let the browser do caching if he cares
06:14 πŸ”— omf_ Oh. I thought you were writing a standalone proxy that could handle many users.
06:15 πŸ”— chronomex noper
06:15 πŸ”— chronomex @chronomex | for personal use
06:16 πŸ”— chronomex reading is a valuable skill, motherfucker
06:19 πŸ”— arkhive Is that okay if I run Warrior Posterous
06:19 πŸ”— chronomex sure
06:19 πŸ”— chronomex poke "go"
06:19 πŸ”— arkhive What?
06:19 πŸ”— arkhive oh
06:19 πŸ”— chronomex yup
06:19 πŸ”— arkhive was that a joke?
06:19 πŸ”— arkhive or do i need to poke something
06:19 πŸ”— arkhive (confused)
06:19 πŸ”— chronomex no, just tell it to start
06:19 πŸ”— chronomex or however you do that
06:20 πŸ”— chronomex poke a button, or whatever
06:20 πŸ”— arkhive ah
06:20 πŸ”— arkhive my warrior has been acting weird. About a month ago i started doing 2 instances of URL Team
06:21 πŸ”— arkhive But only for like an hour.. because i couldn't get it working. Anyway, When I started it up the warrior was still running it ...so I shut it down and started 6 instances of posterous
06:22 πŸ”— arkhive but in the current projects nothing has changed. So i am not sure if it is working.
06:26 πŸ”— arkhive nevermind. I think I got it. Anyway it's 12:25 here in Colorado and I have to be up at 5:30 in the morning. Goodnight.
06:28 πŸ”— chronomex k
06:28 πŸ”— chronomex nite
06:34 πŸ”— joepie92 http://4chandata.org/
06:34 πŸ”— joepie92 So if you want to keep any data you should do it now because everything is gonna be destroyed. For any question/proposal, please send me an e-mail at contact@4chandata.org
06:34 πŸ”— joepie92 WARNING: 4chandata will probably have to close in the weeks to come. Indeed, because of 4chan's reputation and because of its non-filtration, no ad network accepted to put ads on this site. As it hosts more than 400 000 images and about 10 millions messages, the hosting fees are getting too important.
06:44 πŸ”— GLaDOS Anyone contacted them yet?
06:50 πŸ”— kanzure joepie92: what happened to joepie91
06:51 πŸ”— omf_ Do we have a form letter to send to sites that are shutting down?
06:51 πŸ”— omf_ I thought SketchCow contacted most of the sites
07:02 πŸ”— ersi omf_: It's mostly other people contacting sites that shut down, rather then SketchCow
07:03 πŸ”— ersi chronomex: Yeah, I have some experiance with https://github.com/internetarchive/warc
07:04 πŸ”— ersi chronomex: You could check out my ugly ass piece of shit code at https://github.com/ersi/warcshotter btw
07:09 πŸ”— SketchCow Yes, it's a terrible idea to have me contact them
07:10 πŸ”— chronomex ersi: cool thx
07:12 πŸ”— S[h]O[r]T chanarchive.org has changed their layout awhile back to be like reddit which kind of sux..but they have been archiving 4chan stuff for awhile too
07:12 πŸ”— S[h]O[r]T i wish he would post the size of the data
07:12 πŸ”— S[h]O[r]T i also wonder what kind of legal bs he gets but assumingly not much
07:18 πŸ”— S[h]O[r]T omf_ u going to contact them?
07:18 πŸ”— omf_ If GLaDOS doesn't want to. He asked first
07:19 πŸ”— GLaDOS omf_: Go ahead, I'm sure they'll just ignore an email from canadianpharmacyonline@glados.me anyway.
07:21 πŸ”— BlueMax you really need a new email address.
07:22 πŸ”— omf_ okay I am emailing 4chandata
07:24 πŸ”— omf_ heres hoping they actually respond
09:28 πŸ”— omf_ 4chandata responded. They are going to make us a backup
09:28 πŸ”— omf_ I emailed asking for size info and method of transfer
09:29 πŸ”— GLaDOS \o/
09:30 πŸ”— omf_ ѕ™(҇€Ò€¸Ò†¼Ò€¢)ѕ—
09:30 πŸ”— chronomex \o/
09:31 πŸ”— omf_ According to the email I got the main issue is copyright crap
09:31 πŸ”— chronomex pffff
09:32 πŸ”— omf_ yeah like I care about that
09:33 πŸ”— omf_ Save all the things
09:33 πŸ”— chronomex please do
09:41 πŸ”— zyphlar ahoy maties
09:42 πŸ”— omf_ argggh
09:42 πŸ”— omf_ zyphlar, cast off you land lubber :)
09:43 πŸ”— zyphlar graaargh, me mead is running low
09:43 πŸ”— omf_ Looking for a new project?
09:44 πŸ”— zyphlar nah, i just got warrior running. much nicer than google video
09:44 πŸ”— chronomex warrrrioar
09:45 πŸ”— zyphlar lol is that what it's named after?
09:45 πŸ”— chronomex nah
09:45 πŸ”— chronomex tonight we dine in THE CLOUD
09:45 πŸ”— * chronomex roars
09:45 πŸ”— omf_ THE BUTT
09:46 πŸ”— zyphlar freeglucosemetersfordiabclick... i will archive you.
09:46 πŸ”— zyphlar even though dicks don't need glucose meters.
09:47 πŸ”— GLaDOS I think that says click..
09:48 πŸ”— omf_ bad font kerning :)
09:48 πŸ”— GLaDOS Indeed.
09:54 πŸ”— ersi Please go to #preposterus for Posterous talk
10:32 πŸ”— omf_ the 4chandata is 104gb
10:32 πŸ”— omf_ The guy is wondering if archive.org will take it because of legal concerns
10:33 πŸ”— omf_ dude is retarded
10:33 πŸ”— chronomex internet archive takes anything
10:33 πŸ”— SketchCow I will take it.
10:33 πŸ”— chronomex om nom nom
10:33 πŸ”— SketchCow Send him my way if he wants.
10:33 πŸ”— SketchCow jscott@archive.org if he needs some legit
10:40 πŸ”— omf_ At least this guy is very prompt about responding to email
10:46 πŸ”— omf_ and there is a constructive dialogue going on. I couldn't really ask for more than that
11:28 πŸ”— C-Keen hi
12:01 πŸ”— ersi CiaranR: heya
12:01 πŸ”— ersi C-Keen* heya
12:01 πŸ”— C-Keen ersi: hey!
12:04 πŸ”— marc I was about to run warrior to help save posterous content, but it says to ask in here first. So this is me asking in here
12:05 πŸ”— ersi marc: There's a possibility that you might get banned from Posterous by running the warrior with that project. If you're fine with that, proceed.
12:05 πŸ”— marc what do they ban by, IP address ?
12:05 πŸ”— ersi marc: It's however very unlikely you'll get banned these days, since we've taken measures to rate limit and so on
12:05 πŸ”— ersi Yeah, IP. And it's for a few hours to some days.
12:05 πŸ”— marc that's fine
12:05 πŸ”— marc thanks
12:06 πŸ”— marc off it goes
12:06 πŸ”— ersi Feel free to read the FAQ at http://archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Posterous - it got a few bits on this and other stuff :)
12:06 πŸ”— marc will do
12:06 πŸ”— ersi And join up #preposterus, on the same network - for the project specific channel (that's where all the posterous talk and updates go) :)
12:06 πŸ”— ersi Thanks for joining & welcome around
13:12 πŸ”— Nile Hi, I just spun up an archive team VM to help with the Posterous download. The link in the admin panel says 'Posterous will ban you' and to ask here before starting...what do I need to do?
13:13 πŸ”— C-Keen read the FAQ and probably nothing else.... http://archivingyoursh.it/Posterous
13:13 πŸ”— Nile Thanks.
13:14 πŸ”— C-Keen yw!
13:40 πŸ”— bjrn Hi! I just set up the Archive Team Warrior and saw the Posterous project said to check in here before starting it. Is there anything I should know?
13:48 πŸ”— grawity Check #preposterus
13:50 πŸ”— bjrn Will do
15:47 πŸ”— pinwale hey all. :)
16:00 πŸ”— pavel hi
16:00 πŸ”— DrDeke hullo
18:46 πŸ”— joepie92 <omf_>and there is a constructive dialogue going on. I couldn't really ask for more than that
18:46 πŸ”— joepie92 this makes it a smoother experience than 99% of the archiveteam projects so far
18:46 πŸ”— joepie92 :P
18:47 πŸ”— joepie92 <kanzure>joepie92: what happened to joepie91
18:47 πŸ”— joepie92 he died :(
18:47 πŸ”— joepie91 oh look he's back
20:05 πŸ”— SketchCow https://twitter.com/jarxg/status/311930704495788032
20:05 πŸ”— SketchCow \o/
20:05 πŸ”— SketchCow Makin' friends
20:05 πŸ”— alard SketchCow: Hi.
20:08 πŸ”— Samuel_Mi I like the reply, SketchCow })i({
20:17 πŸ”— SketchCow Ubu dude and I are going to work together in mail.
20:17 πŸ”— SketchCow Now I have to remember why I annoyed alard
20:17 πŸ”— SketchCow Some of the stuff in your directory was already uploaded.
20:17 πŸ”— SketchCow Luckily I caught it
20:17 πŸ”— alard Perhaps it was because you discovered the Xanga directory.
20:17 πŸ”— SketchCow Well, that might be it.
20:17 πŸ”— SketchCow Damn, dude, 3tb
20:17 πŸ”— alard We can make more if you want.
20:19 πŸ”— Gnat Hey guys; are you familiar with http://my.opera.com ?
20:19 πŸ”— Gnat It's a fair-sized social network run by the people at Opera Software
20:19 πŸ”— Gnat does photo-sharing, blogging, forums...
20:20 πŸ”— Gnat and word has it, it's going to close down in a few months.
20:22 πŸ”— grawity really? even the support forums?
20:23 πŸ”— Gnat I'm not entirely sure how they'll be handled, but I know some form of support forums will exist in future.
20:23 πŸ”— adamcaudi Gnat: I heard that same rumor elsewhere recently
20:23 πŸ”— Gnat Not sure whether the same software, databases, etc. will remain
20:23 πŸ”— Gnat or whether they'll just re-open a new forum
20:25 πŸ”— Gnat There's no restrictions on archive.org indexing the site, so that's good.
20:25 πŸ”— Gnat But I'm not sure how comprehensive that covers the content on the site.
20:26 πŸ”— Gnat I'm not so confident in Opera Software's capacity for giving users options to export their data
20:32 πŸ”— hdevalenc how does archive.org deal with copyright on non-web materials?
20:34 πŸ”— chronomex look up who uses the phrase "no copyright intended"
20:36 πŸ”— SketchCow Oh, alard - that was the question. Why did we start on Xanga? Why did we stop?
20:40 πŸ”— hdevalenc chronomex: No, I mean, for material that isn't found on the web.
20:42 πŸ”— hdevalenc for example, something like this radio show: http://archive.org/details/afropop_worldwide
20:42 πŸ”— hdevalenc presumably at least some of that music is copyright-encumbered
20:47 πŸ”— alard SketchCow: We started because you said "Someone look at Xanga", we stopped because you said "COntinue like download it? Not download it. We weren't specifically graing Xanga yet. We just took an assessment. Xanga hasn't shown an explicit death or decay yet."
20:48 πŸ”— alard SketchCow: I have to admit that I kept the warriors on it for a little bit longer after that. :)
20:49 πŸ”— alard But yes, we started when someone suggested that Xanga might be aging, to make an assessment of the size.
20:54 πŸ”— SketchCow Ha ha
20:54 πŸ”— SketchCow 3tb of "WOAH NELLY"
20:54 πŸ”— SketchCow (skiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiid)
20:54 πŸ”— SketchCow Anyway, impressive.
20:54 πŸ”— balrog_ why not archive the whole thing when we don't have other stuff to do? :P
20:55 πŸ”— balrog_ (right now we DO have other stuff to do)
20:55 πŸ”— SketchCow But totally clogging the drive.
20:55 πŸ”— balrog_ or would that upset IA?
20:56 πŸ”— alard SketchCow: As far as I'm concerned, feel free to start uploading. The 50GB-directory-making-script should work for Xanga. (And you can run it again later, should you want to, and it will continue filling the current/ directory.)
20:57 πŸ”— alard At some point I wrote that "the current Xanga estimate is 35TB."
20:58 πŸ”— SketchCow Already doing it.
20:58 πŸ”— SketchCow http://archive.org/details/archiveteam_xanga
20:58 πŸ”— SketchCow HAVE to.
20:58 πŸ”— SketchCow I need to clear FOS
21:00 πŸ”— SketchCow if FOS is clogged, we can't react to ANYTHING
21:00 πŸ”— SketchCow So I'm clearing it out except active projects.
21:09 πŸ”— SketchCow We're at 7tb of disk space free, so we're in good shape
21:21 πŸ”— godane so that explans the g4tv not being grabed by you
21:21 πŸ”— godane FOS is full :P
21:51 πŸ”— habi Ciao
21:52 πŸ”— habi I'd like to run a ArchiveTeam Warrior to help with the posterous closing.
21:52 πŸ”— habi The VM tells me that I should ask here first.
21:52 πŸ”— habi Do I do something wrong if I just let it run?
21:52 πŸ”— alard habi: Welcome. More info in #preposterus
21:53 πŸ”— alard No, the main reason for that warning is that you might get blocked by Posterous. The chance is pretty small, but it could happen.
21:56 πŸ”— habi OK. I'm getting a bunch of 502 errors intermittent with "Downloaded XX URLs".
21:57 πŸ”— DrDeke Am I correct in thinking that the message "Tracker rate limiting is in effect. Retrying after 30 seconds..." refers to an overload of the archiveteam server(s), as opposed to an overload of the servers of posterous or any of the other projects?
21:58 πŸ”— alard No, the tracker is fine, but we limit the number of items it gives out each minute. We don't want to overload Posterous.
21:58 πŸ”— DrDeke ahh, ok
21:58 πŸ”— DrDeke What about if it gives that message on other projects? Same idea?
22:03 πŸ”— alard Yes. If the tracker isn't responding you get a different message.
23:23 πŸ”— akkuhn hi kids.
23:23 πŸ”— akkuhn http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/13/4101144/google-shuts-down-reader-rss-aggregation-service
23:23 πŸ”— akkuhn we can has public feed downloads?
23:24 πŸ”— ersi what the FUCK
23:24 πŸ”— akkuhn example: http://www.google.com/reader/view/#directory-search/clowns//0
23:25 πŸ”— ersi I guess that makes it oh so much easier to migrate off of Google now. Let me just get my mail and I'm out
23:26 πŸ”— akkuhn http://www.google.com/reader/view/#directory-page/0 - the "bundles" specifically (which i admit i never even knew were in there..."
23:26 πŸ”— akkuhn that first link i sent not sure if it's collected aggregations of rss feeds users have put in (Seems to be), or if there's some index of user-shared feed "bundles"
23:29 πŸ”— akkuhn so yeah, there is this concept of user-created feed bundles. here, made one: http://www.google.com/reader/bundle/user/03937704522554951353/bundle/Finance%20Test
23:30 πŸ”— akkuhn which they give embed code for. so there's going to be a lot of broken empty whitespace/errors in websites when they stop rendering that thing.
23:33 πŸ”— akkuhn here's the full sunsetting list: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2013/03/a-second-spring-of-cleaning.html
23:37 πŸ”— balrog_ Fuck Google
23:37 πŸ”— balrog_ the week I start using Reader, they announce its going away.
23:39 πŸ”— balrog_ first half of 2013 is a very unfortunate time for the Web...
23:40 πŸ”— arkhive Google is becoming Yahoo!
23:40 πŸ”— arkhive I LOVED Google Wave
23:40 πŸ”— arkhive and they've shut down so many services/websites/communities
23:41 πŸ”— arkhive and they got rid of google labs. I feel like the 'Google Spirit' is gone. Now a more traditional corporation.
23:42 πŸ”— akkuhn at some point someone's going to look at the services and ask "is this making money?", and in the event of a corporation if the answer is no, benevolence on the web unfortunately has a finite shelf life at the whims of profits
23:42 πŸ”— arkhive Seriously. Google Labs was awesome. That was one way they were so unique.
23:44 πŸ”— arkhive Ya. I get that. My Dad is a CFO of a global manufacturing corporation and he kind of explained that to me.
23:44 πŸ”— akkuhn 90+ day notice and a well done data export tool is a lot more than the norm we've been seeing. not apologizing for them.
23:44 πŸ”— arkhive Ya
23:44 πŸ”— GLaDOS We should've totally done Archive@Home
23:44 πŸ”— arkhive But it still sucks at the same time
23:44 πŸ”— balrog_ yeah but MANY people use this.
23:44 πŸ”— balrog_ a lot more than used Posterous or Yahoo Messages
23:45 πŸ”— arkhive Yeah. I hear you. It just sucks. :P
23:45 πŸ”— omf_ balrog_, I doubt your claim reader is bigger than Yahoo Messages. If you could provide some facts to back that statement up
23:45 πŸ”— balrog_ I wouldn't be surprised if there are more Google Reader users than there were Geocities users
23:45 πŸ”— balrog_ many people use it with Reeder and other apps
23:45 πŸ”— chronomex bigger by what metric
23:45 πŸ”— balrog_ most people use it to view, not to post.
23:46 πŸ”— balrog_ I didn't claim. I said "wouldn't be surprised"
23:46 πŸ”— wp494 a F@H-style archiving program would be quite cool glados
23:47 πŸ”— wp494 but isn't there one already?
23:47 πŸ”— wp494 let me check
23:47 πŸ”— GLaDOS Have accounts, leaderboards, etc.
23:47 πŸ”— chronomex warrior doesn't count?
23:47 πŸ”— Sellyme There's Majestic-12, which isn't quite the same, it's a distributed search engine.
23:47 πŸ”— Sellyme But similar concept.
23:47 πŸ”— GLaDOS Warrior is, well, different.
23:47 πŸ”— Sellyme Distributed bandwidth kind of thing.
23:47 πŸ”— GLaDOS kind of anyway
23:48 πŸ”— * GLaDOS renames Warrior to Archive@Home
23:48 πŸ”— Sellyme Example: http://i.imgur.com/GEjauht.png
23:48 πŸ”— Sellyme Aaaand the homepage: http://www.majestic12.co.uk/
23:48 πŸ”— Sellyme Although I do vaguely remember something more similar to what's being suggested from '02 or so
23:48 πŸ”— balrog_ warrior requires a heavy VM
23:49 πŸ”— balrog_ F@H is fairly lightweight
23:49 πŸ”— Sellyme Heh, not if you're running the GPU client :P
23:49 πŸ”— balrog_ btw an antivirus shouldn't affect what goes into the WARC, does it?
23:49 πŸ”— Sellyme Warrior legitimately uses less RAM than the Folding@Home GPU core does for some work units.
23:49 πŸ”— GLaDOS Sadly, BOINC only supports AMD and Nvidia GPUs
23:49 πŸ”— akkuhn Warrior doesn't "require" a heavy VM, it's just the chosen implementation. there's nothing stopping someone from doing a similar functionality in a lightweight win* client
23:49 πŸ”— * GLaDOS has yet to buy a GPU, uses an embedded Ivy Bridge
23:50 πŸ”— chronomex the vm is because it's easier to provide a consistent environment
23:50 πŸ”— * wp494 already has a 660 ti
23:50 πŸ”— balrog_ I know, but why can't that portion be rolled into a lightweight handler process? that might require a ton of work though
23:51 πŸ”— chronomex did I hear you just volunteer? ;)
23:52 πŸ”— balrog_ no time :(
23:52 πŸ”— balrog_ at least not right now
23:54 πŸ”— akkuhn is there any way run a VM entirely in a browser at this point? A lightweight hypervisor (java? html5?) that can pull down an OVF and run it right there? click this link, boom, you're running warrior?
23:54 πŸ”— GLaDOS I'm going to get a Titan when I can afford it, which should be soon.
23:54 πŸ”— GLaDOS Graphics Card Power (W): 250
23:54 πŸ”— GLaDOS That's less than the 690..
23:56 πŸ”— akkuhn http://bellard.org/jslinux/
23:56 πŸ”— akkuhn presto?
23:58 πŸ”— akkuhn that's a PC emu in and of itself i know, but can someone make the underlying warrior tasks push down in the base disk image and run?
23:59 πŸ”— akkuhn looks like it doesnt emulate any network stack at the moment
irclogger-viewer