| Time |
Nickname |
Message |
|
01:08
🔗
|
DFJustin |
so on a distasteful note, http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/07/17/luka_magnotta_gore_site_owner_charged_for_posting_dismemberment_video.html |
|
01:08
🔗
|
DFJustin |
looks like bestgore.com may be needing a backup |
|
01:46
🔗
|
godane |
i'm not touching it |
|
01:47
🔗
|
godane |
i was stupid enough to go there for 2 seconds to see what it was |
|
01:48
🔗
|
godane |
me thought when heard about this it was like Al Gore site admin posted something |
|
01:48
🔗
|
ivan` |
DFJustin: I have a big but partial HTTrack already and have started a WARC |
|
01:48
🔗
|
ivan` |
I really wish wget could resume :/ |
|
01:49
🔗
|
ivan` |
maybe I should run it in a VM always |
|
01:49
🔗
|
DFJustin |
not a bad idea |
|
01:50
🔗
|
ivan` |
a VM that runs an operating system that never needs security updates ;) |
|
01:54
🔗
|
ivan` |
http://criu.org/Main_Page http://criu.org/Installation says something about Linux 3.9 supporting some process checkpoint/restore |
|
01:54
🔗
|
godane |
looks like i was not the only one |
|
01:55
🔗
|
godane |
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3985789&cid=44312771 |
|
02:00
🔗
|
ivan` |
it looks like slashdot has been completely taken over by trolls |
|
02:01
🔗
|
ivan` |
re: whole thread |
|
11:57
🔗
|
SketchCow |
Slashdot... it is not an awesome place. |
|
12:04
🔗
|
Smiley |
Nope, not sure why we are discussing it. |
|
12:11
🔗
|
SketchCow |
People who are younger come along and are confused at how bad it is now. |
|
12:11
🔗
|
SketchCow |
It used to be a different kind of bad but you sucked it up because attention was important. |
|
12:13
🔗
|
Smiley |
:D |
|
12:49
🔗
|
BlueMax |
I thought Slashdotting still existed in this day and age |
|
12:58
🔗
|
Smiley |
it does. |
|
13:22
🔗
|
alih-duck |
i dunno that the five users left on slashdot would be serious bandwidth anymore tho |
|
13:26
🔗
|
balrog |
slashdot... can be hilariously bad. |
|
13:26
🔗
|
balrog |
it's not ALL bad |
|
13:26
🔗
|
balrog |
but often I wonder how many articles make it to the front page |
|
13:26
🔗
|
balrog |
that didn't happen almost at all before |
|
13:27
🔗
|
balrog |
the comments are always a cesspit though |
|
13:27
🔗
|
Smiley |
oh it did, but not far as often. |
|
13:27
🔗
|
ersi |
Slashdot barely bring any noticable bandwidth these days. |
|
13:27
🔗
|
ersi |
Slashdot is pretty shitty, yes |
|
13:29
🔗
|
ersi |
http://open.commonly.cc/unlocked (argh, why the fuck are they using Javascript for the download-button) |
|
13:31
🔗
|
alih-duck |
i still enjoy reading the -1 comments |
|
13:36
🔗
|
alih-duck |
always feed the trolls, goddamnit |
|
17:05
🔗
|
SketchCow |
So, I'm speaking at a conference and getting an award for archive team. |
|
17:05
🔗
|
SketchCow |
The keynote is the head of bit.ly |
|
17:05
🔗
|
SketchCow |
How is bit.ly in the url exporter thing |
|
17:08
🔗
|
winr4r |
haha awesome |
|
17:12
🔗
|
omf_ |
They have only done one release to 301works http://archive.org/details/301bly . We have discovered more and more shorteners that are just aliases to bit.ly |
|
17:13
🔗
|
omf_ |
or 301works doesn't release anything but their 301works.org just redirects to the IA page |
|
17:13
🔗
|
soultcer |
Oh, I never knew bit.ly uploaded a single dump. Guess my statement of "bit.ly never uploaded a single URL" is wrong |
|
17:16
🔗
|
soultcer |
I mean, they uploaded a backup and it's a whopping 140 MB. They must have some awesome data compression compared to the 39 GB bit.ly data in the upcoming urlteam release ;-) |
|
17:17
🔗
|
omf_ |
As soultcer has pointed out before, bit.ly only did it for the PR and have shown to commitment or progress to helping 301works |