[01:08] <DFJustin> so on a distasteful note, http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/07/17/luka_magnotta_gore_site_owner_charged_for_posting_dismemberment_video.html
[01:08] <DFJustin> looks like bestgore.com may be needing a backup
[01:46] <godane> i'm not touching it
[01:47] <godane> i was stupid enough to go there for 2 seconds to see what it was
[01:48] <godane> me thought when heard about this it was like Al Gore site admin posted something
[01:48] <ivan`> DFJustin: I have a big but partial HTTrack already and have started a WARC
[01:48] <ivan`> I really wish wget could resume :/
[01:49] <ivan`> maybe I should run it in a VM always
[01:49] <DFJustin> not a bad idea
[01:50] <ivan`> a VM that runs an operating system that never needs security updates ;)
[01:54] <ivan`> http://criu.org/Main_Page http://criu.org/Installation says something about Linux 3.9 supporting some process checkpoint/restore
[01:54] <godane> looks like i was not the only one
[01:55] <godane> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3985789&cid=44312771
[02:00] <ivan`> it looks like slashdot has been completely taken over by trolls
[02:01] <ivan`> re: whole thread
[11:57] <SketchCow> Slashdot... it is not an awesome place.
[12:04] <Smiley> Nope, not sure why we are discussing it.
[12:11] <SketchCow> People who are younger come along and are confused at how bad it is now.
[12:11] <SketchCow> It used to be a different kind of bad but you sucked it up because attention was important.
[12:13] <Smiley> :D
[12:49] <BlueMax> I thought Slashdotting still existed in this day and age
[12:58] <Smiley> it does.
[13:22] <alih-duck> i dunno that the five users left on slashdot would be serious bandwidth anymore tho
[13:26] <balrog> slashdot... can be hilariously bad.
[13:26] <balrog> it's not ALL bad
[13:26] <balrog> but often I wonder how many articles make it to the front page
[13:26] <balrog> that didn't happen almost at all before
[13:27] <balrog> the comments are always a cesspit though
[13:27] <Smiley> oh it did, but not far as often.
[13:27] <ersi> Slashdot barely bring any noticable bandwidth these days.
[13:27] <ersi> Slashdot is pretty shitty, yes
[13:29] <ersi> http://open.commonly.cc/unlocked (argh, why the fuck are they using Javascript for the download-button)
[13:31] <alih-duck> i still enjoy reading the -1 comments
[13:36] <alih-duck> always feed the trolls, goddamnit
[17:05] <SketchCow> So, I'm speaking at a conference and getting an award for archive team.
[17:05] <SketchCow> The keynote is the head of bit.ly
[17:05] <SketchCow> How is bit.ly in the url exporter thing
[17:08] <winr4r> haha awesome
[17:12] <omf_> They have only done one release to 301works http://archive.org/details/301bly . We have discovered more and more shorteners that are just aliases to bit.ly
[17:13] <omf_> or 301works doesn't release anything but their 301works.org just redirects to the IA page
[17:13] <soultcer> Oh, I never knew bit.ly uploaded a single dump. Guess my statement of "bit.ly never uploaded a single URL" is wrong
[17:16] <soultcer> I mean, they uploaded a backup and it's a whopping 140 MB. They must have some awesome data compression compared to the 39 GB bit.ly data in the upcoming urlteam release ;-)
[17:17] <omf_> As soultcer has pointed out before, bit.ly only did it for the PR and have shown to commitment or progress to helping 301works