Time |
Nickname |
Message |
01:43
🔗
|
|
gig3x- is now known as gig3x |
04:27
🔗
|
|
qw3rty114 has joined #internetarchive |
04:34
🔗
|
|
qw3rty113 has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) |
04:48
🔗
|
|
odemg has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 615 seconds) |
04:55
🔗
|
|
odemg has joined #internetarchive |
07:23
🔗
|
|
atomotic has joined #internetarchive |
07:25
🔗
|
|
atomotic has quit IRC (Client Quit) |
07:52
🔗
|
|
fredgido has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
09:07
🔗
|
|
iPlonk has quit IRC (WeeChat 2.2) |
10:08
🔗
|
|
VADemon has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
10:08
🔗
|
|
VADemon has joined #internetarchive |
13:03
🔗
|
|
Phoen1x has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) |
13:05
🔗
|
|
Phoen1x has joined #internetarchive |
14:27
🔗
|
|
atomotic has joined #internetarchive |
16:04
🔗
|
|
atomotic has quit IRC (Quit: Textual IRC Client: www.textualapp.com) |
16:46
🔗
|
JAA |
Does anyone here have experience with parallel uploads to the same item via S3, or more specifically 'ia upload'? I found one comment by Jake on GitHub <https://github.com/jjjake/internetarchive/issues/159#issuecomment-252038433> saying "it does not really pay to upload to a single item concurrently. It is recommended to upload to different items in parallel" without providing any explanation. Does |
16:47
🔗
|
JAA |
anyone know what he means there? |
18:43
🔗
|
VoynichCr |
because bottleneck happens in the machine assigned to that item? so paralel upload gets better results if you upload to multiple items (machines). I dunno |
19:34
🔗
|
|
arbin has quit IRC (Quit: .) |
19:35
🔗
|
|
arbin has joined #internetarchive |
21:17
🔗
|
|
Jasjar has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) |
21:23
🔗
|
|
fredgido has joined #internetarchive |