Time |
Nickname |
Message |
03:09
🔗
|
db48x |
I just realized that I am starving |
03:10
🔗
|
db48x |
:( |
03:10
🔗
|
db48x |
I thnk I ate breakfast before starting on this thing... |
03:10
🔗
|
db48x |
14 hours ago :( |
03:14
🔗
|
db48x |
the empty cheese packet on the counter tells me that I might have nibbled at some point |
03:14
🔗
|
db48x |
back later |
03:15
🔗
|
db48x |
doesn't seem like the tracker will blow up again |
10:35
🔗
|
deathy |
what concurrency setting makes sense for this? taking into account rate limiting and things |
11:11
🔗
|
db48x |
just 1 |
11:12
🔗
|
db48x |
the tracker won't issue a second job to you (as categorized by ipaddress) unless we add a second shortener |
11:12
🔗
|
deathy |
yeah, had a short run with higher concurrency and got an error from the tracker |
11:15
🔗
|
db48x |
the idea is that one instance should be able to work as fast as possible without getting banned |
11:15
🔗
|
db48x |
although I don't think we're achieving that; it's not particularly fast |
11:20
🔗
|
deathy |
from what I remember some time ago, mostly it was waiting because of rate limiting and so on. that's why I had it set up on my rpi then, no big cpu usage, low power, mostly just waiting |
11:21
🔗
|
db48x |
yes, I've got it set to 20 requests per second for this one |
11:21
🔗
|
Smiley |
hmmm |
11:21
🔗
|
Smiley |
so we need more ip's? |
11:21
🔗
|
db48x |
but mine don't manage more than 15 or 16 per second |
11:21
🔗
|
Smiley |
and more shorteners |
11:21
🔗
|
db48x |
Smiley: yes :) |
11:23
🔗
|
Smiley |
well i'd say get it in teh warrior asap |
11:23
🔗
|
Smiley |
that'll give us some ips at least |
11:23
🔗
|
Smiley |
as for more shortners hmmm |
11:31
🔗
|
db48x |
it is in the warrior :) |
11:32
🔗
|
Smiley |
k cool |
11:44
🔗
|
deathy |
"WARNING: ServiceException(HTTP exception: '') on code 378dg" |
12:01
🔗
|
db48x |
hmm |
12:02
🔗
|
db48x |
I get an ordinary 404 on that one |
12:03
🔗
|
db48x |
perhaps a transient error? |
12:05
🔗
|
deathy |
yeah, only saw it once for that code |
12:42
🔗
|
deathy |
any idea on "WARNING: Server refused data for task c9f14cb6-04ac-11e4-8df6-040104b9e501" ? |
12:42
🔗
|
deathy |
Getting it from time to time, but only on 1 out of 3 servers I'm running the script on |
15:36
🔗
|
db48x |
hmm |
15:37
🔗
|
db48x |
deathy: it doesn't record a lot of data about that sort of thing, but c9f14cb6-04ac-11e4-8df6-040104b9e501 is marked as finished, and was completed by 'bhtooefr' |
20:10
🔗
|
deathy |
no idea when it marked as finished? |
20:10
🔗
|
deathy |
could either have been an error in my upload presumably.. |
20:11
🔗
|
deathy |
or else it was assigned both to bhtooefr and myself..which is strange (maybe not in case the other one was assigned earlier but timed out or something and re-assigned to me..) |
23:58
🔗
|
deathy |
db48x: here's a recent one: http://pastebin.com/CvVzYDd1 |