[00:05] *** Muad-Dib has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [00:18] *** Muad-Dib has joined #urlteam [03:36] *** odemg has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 268 seconds) [03:36] *** warmwaffl has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [03:48] *** odemg has joined #urlteam [04:33] *** Somebody2 has joined #urlteam [04:33] *** svchfoo1 sets mode: +o Somebody2 [04:34] We should probably spin up some more projects, if we can... [04:34] (I finally got around to turning my Warrior back on, and noticed it wasn't getting work) [04:35] boosting bitly_6 queue to 70 rather than 60 [04:36] are we going to rescrape bitly_5 or did we literally get them all? [04:37] and 80 [04:37] Flashfire: good question! I don't know! [04:37] Please research it, and I'll gladly act on what you find out. [04:39] Flashfire: got any suggestions of shorterners that are ready for us to bang on? [04:39] bdu.me [04:40] It is a scam domain but an interesting one to grab [04:40] bookw.it from bookwitty [04:40] The site went down not sure if the short url is still viable to grab [04:41] Flashfire: Please add both of those to the wiki page! [04:41] and gather the info listed at https://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=URLTeam#Researching_URL_Shorteners [04:41] and I'll be delighted to add them [04:43] doing a quick re-check of burl-se [04:48] The text you wanted to save was blocked by the spam filter. [04:48] This is probably caused by a link to a blacklisted external site. [04:48] The following text is what triggered our spam filter: sexchat [04:48] just add a dash in the middle of the blocked word [04:49] Or something like "sex-DAMMIT SPAM FILTER-chat" if you prefer [04:49] ok, burl-se recheck done [04:51] trying turning on xco a bit more [04:53] xco requires https [04:53] fixed that now [04:53] Alright my internet didnt like when I tried to edit the wiki [04:54] either that or completely unrelated my internet went down for 2 minutes [04:54] weird [04:55] xco also uses 302 redirects, now; apparently 4 years ago it used 301s [04:55] but bdu.me redirects to some dirty tinder thing. it isnt just limited to a 5 symbol alphanumeric sequence as bdu.me/1 worked [04:56] as did http://bdu.me/Vika19 which was the original one that was how I learned about it [04:56] thx -- what's the http code? [04:58] http as far as I know [04:58] no, I mean 301, 302, etc [04:58] https isnt loading [04:58] oh I dont know how to check that. I am new to a lot of this [04:58] but as it happens, it looks like that isn't actually a shortener, just a constant redirect to the same sex site. [04:59] so not really in our scope [04:59] ok then my bad [04:59] no worries -- better to investigate it than not [05:00] if/when you can edit the wiki, feel free to mention it as an example of something that looks like a shortner but isn't [05:03] xco seems to be going well [05:05] boosted it's queue to 120 [05:05] we'll see if it complains [05:06] how many bitly_5 did we end up grabbing? [05:07] IDK -- you'll need to find it in the archive [05:08] yoolink-to -- let's see if it'll give us anything [05:10] youlink-to does not seem to be returning any results yet [05:11] I'm going to give up on it for now [05:11] I cant find anything about Bitly_5 [05:12] and the logs are down at the moment [05:12] no mention of it on the wiki page? [05:12] or in the urlteam collection on archive.org? [05:12] we may not have grabbed it, for all I know [05:15] I mean what do we usually start from when we grab a short url? [05:15] do we start with single digits or go straight to 6? [05:16] considering what we have documented of yahoo.it or whatever it is having grabbed _5 _6 and _8 im not sure we did grab it [05:17] depends on the shortener. Do you have evidence that bit.ly *HAS* 5-character links? [05:18] yep, it does [05:18] bit.ly/12345 [05:18] Unless its just inproperly documented [05:19] I'm not sure it isn't included in the bitly_6 job [05:19] you'll need to check the archive [05:19] I cant find anything so far [05:19] ok, we can certainly do a bitly_5 job! [05:20] I mean the worst that could happen is 2 copies of it and I doubt thats a huge problem with a guess that the data we would have it inconplete [05:20] bitly_6 is using custom code, so a bitly_5 job will probably want to use that, too. [05:20] How familiar are you with Python? [05:21] I am familiar with the snake and I can copy and paste commands into terminal [05:21] Thats about it sadly [05:21] heh [05:21] well, we may have to wait till someone with enough python knowledge and time is willing to set it up [05:21] alright then [05:22] I have the knowledge, but only the time to intermittently poke at the admin interface, not hack up the (pretty small) changes needed [05:22] ok [05:22] But if you've got the time and interest, please do look into *learning* python and checking out the code [05:22] no worries if not [05:23] http://2jump.info has only 3 successful grabs of 298,949 scanned [05:23] ..... [05:23] and with that, I'm going to bow out for the night. [05:23] ok then seeya [05:23] Yep -- that one got banned [05:23] ah well would it work if someone did it manually? [08:19] *** zhongfu has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [11:37] *** zhongfu has joined #urlteam [14:13] *** SilSte has joined #urlteam [14:15] *** Silvan has quit IRC (Read error: Operation timed out) [16:17] Flashfire: IDK -- worth trying! [16:19] *** kiskaBak has quit IRC (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) [16:19] *** Flashfire has quit IRC (Quit: Ping timeout (120 seconds)) [16:21] *** Flashfire has joined #urlteam [16:21] *** kiskaBak has joined #urlteam [16:36] *** zhongfu has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) [17:14] *** zhongfu has joined #urlteam [21:20] *** SN4T14 has quit IRC (Remote host closed the connection) [21:21] *** SN4T14 has joined #urlteam [23:02] Is anyone aware if we did a bitly_5 job?